V.            Intellectual Giants Critique Religion
             Freethinkers* Like Galileo, Voltaire, Darwin, Marx, Freud, Einstein, et al. 
                        

A believer is a bird in a cage, a freethinker* is an eagle parting the clouds with tireless wings.

Robert G. Ingersoll (1833-1899)

 

 
        Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.
                                                                              Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
 
                                We freethinkers* shall forgive them,
for they don't know what they believe.
                                               Anonymous
*For a definition of freethinker see Intellectual Standards.
 

A. Freethinkers and Free Thought on Religion
1. Freethinking with Regard to Religion
2. Moral Religion vs. Religious Illusion by I. Kant
3. Authentic Religion Without a Belief in God by F. C. Forberg
4. The Nature of Religion by K. Marx
5. My Own Mind is my Own Church by T. Pain
6. Church and Religion by Robert G. Ingersoll
7. A Naturalist's Vow by Robert G. Ingersoll
8. Religious Freedom by Thomas Jefferson
9. Concerning Religious Tolerance by Algernon Black
10. The Heretical Sayings of Pope Boniface VIII
B. Freethinkers on the Existence of God
11. The Origins of the God Idea by A. Einstein
12. A Critique of the Religious Teaching of Ethics by A. Einstein
13. A Psychoanalysis of Religion and the God Idea by S. Freud
14. The Bible, the Word of a God or a Damon? by T. Paine
15. The Study of Theology is Futile by T. Pain
16. Comments on God and Religion by T. Jefferson
17. The Trinity Explained by Robert G. Ingersoll
18. Believe vs. Inquiry by H. Heine and Anonymous
C. Darwin on His "Religious Belief"
19. On the Old Testament
20. On the New Testament
21. On Everlasting Punishment
22. On the Argument from Design
23. On Suffering in This World
24. On the Argument from Subjective Certitude
25. On Life Without a Personal God
D. Thoughts and Quotes from Antiquity to Modernity
 
 
A.              Freethinkers and Free Thought on Religion
1. Freethinking with Regard to Religion
Intellectual honesty demands that we consider opposing points of view, for the strengths and weaknesses of both sides, religious belief and unbelief, may then become more apparent.
Believers often fear to understand things that threaten their life-coping, hence, cherished beliefs. Moreover, their thinking about what to accept as true is restricted by the creed or doctrines of their faith. They are at least in part heteronomous, that is, governed by others.
Unbelievers, on the other hand, are not shackled by religious belief or church dogma. They may think freely and heretically, that is, state a set of opinions opposed to official or established views. Hence, these individuals can be autonomous, that is, governed by themselves.
Freethinkers and heretics reject authority and dogma, especially in religion. They belong to an ancient and honorable vocation that has made, and is still making, important contributions to religion thru their constructive criticism. In particular, they point out pernicious falsehoods, hypocrisies, and theological excesses. As their writings and comments in this section reflect, they are exceptionally virtues--they are the salt of the earth. They would be the saints of what could be a universal religion--a set of moral rules--beneficial for all of humanity and their environment.
The unfinished Enlightenment project against the imprisonment of independent thought by religious and other authorities still advances thanks largely to free-thinking individuals. And the same goes for the "culture war" against remnants, and a resurgence, of the Dark Middle Ages.
 
2. Moral Religion vs. Religious Illusion by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
"Whatever, over and above good life-conduct, man fancies that he can become well-pleasing to God is mere religious illusion and pseudo-service of God."*
 
This maxim, found in Kant's Religion Within the Bounds of Mere Reason (1793), strongly implies that whoever practices "good life-conduct" practices moral religion; thus, this is the religion of all good, descent men whether they aware of it or not. In the same work Kant asserts:
  • Whatever is claimed to be true in a religion must be derivable from moral, practical reason. To think of the uttering of religious formulas or the performance of formal services to God as having a value of their own is to fall into the grossest superstition.
  • Pseudo service, service counterproductive to moral religion, includes offerings to God that range from [man's] "lip-offerings, which cost him the least, to the donation of earthly goods, which might better be used for the advantage of mankind, yea, even to the sacrifice of his own person, becoming lost to the world (as a hermit, fakir, or monk) . . . ." Moreover, for Kant this kind of organized "fetishism" includes: prayers, dogmas, revelations, confessions, the belief in miracles, pilgrimages, rituals for public worship such as, the Eucharist, baptism, weddings, funerals, etc.
  • There is a significant negative side in the concrete, historical character of the human formation of religion, for it is subject to the same self-serving corruption that is the mark of radical evil in humans. Among them are organized religion's external ritual, superstition, and a hierarchical church order. These are all efforts to make oneself pleasing to God in ways other than conscientious adherence to the principle of moral rightness in the choice of one's actions.
  • Organized religion evolved from individual cultures. The attempt to turn anyone one of them into a world religion, which is valid for all men, is religious delusion.
  • The only true religion is the one that has practical rules, whose absolute necessity we are aware of, and the individual can derive from moral, practical reason.
     In an earlier work, Critique of Pure Reason (1781), Kant rejects the possibility of theoretical proofs for the existence of God. He concludes: Knowledge of the supersensible, such as God as well as freedom of the will and immortality is impossible. However in a later work, Critique of Practical Reason (1788), he claims that "Practical reason demands that we belief in God, freedom [of the will], and immortality." Moreover, Kant believed that belief was necessary for the folks and admits a lack of intellectual honesty when he writes in the preface of his 1781 work  "I had therefore to remove knowledge, in order to make room for belief."
*In German: „alles, was, außer dem guten Lebenswandel, der Mensch noch tun zu können vermeint, um Gott wohlgefällig zu werden, ist bloßer Religionswahn und Afterdienst [unechter, falscher Dienst] Gottes.“
 
3. Genuine Religion Without a Belief in God by F. C. Forberg (1770-1848)
 
In the last analysis, arguing about the existence or nonexistence of God, or the "truth" of popular religions, leads us nowhere. For as the philosopher Forberg argues:
  • Genuine religion is "purely and solely the fruit of a morally good heart . . ;
  • "It originates entirely from the wish of the good heart that the good in the world should triumph over evil."
  • To have "genuine religion" is not necessarily to have a belief in God;
  • It is to be a partisan of the good, to act as if the kingdom of God, which for Forberg means a just and moral world, were attainable.
  • So, practical belief and theoretical unbelief may well go together. Hence, a person who does not believe in a personified god or gods can be religious.
 
Perhaps all religions are "true" to the extend that they meet the preceding criteria. At least, Forberg’s definition is broad, rational, and very humane so that it may unite rather than divide humanity. One reason, however, philosophy still deals with the riddle of the existence of God or the truth of religion is that these concepts have often been abused in order to control, deceive, and exploit the many for power, profit, prestige, and privilege.
 
 
 
 
 
4. The Nature of Religion by Karl Marx (1818-1883) founder of scientific socialism.
    Summarized by Ian Robertson in Society, (NY: Worth Publishers, Inc., 1989) pp.265-266. 
 
Marx claimed, the dominant religion in any society is always the religion of its economically and politically dominant class, and it always provides a justification for existing inequalities and injustices. The dominant religion legitimates the interest of the ruling class and, like a narcotic, lulls the oppressed into the acceptance of their lot. Marx proclaimed passionately:

The foundation of irreligious criticism is: Man makes religion, religion does not make man. . . . Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people [my emphasis, opium was used in Marx’s time almost exclusively for relieving pain, and it is used by Marx in this sense.].

     The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.

             Introduction, Critique of the Hegelian Philosophy of Right.
 
 
 
Marx conceded that in very simple, pre-industrial societies that have no class division, religion is simply a matter of superstition. In all other societies, he insisted, the dominant religion supports the status quo and diverts the attention of the oppressed from their real problems.
     There is no shortage of historical evidence to support Marx's view that the dominant religion in any society legitimates the interests of the ruling class. In fact, it is difficult to find a contrary example. The most striking instances occurred in those ancient societies in which the rulers were believed to be divine, or at least descended from the gods. . . . [in European societies] the feudal system drew legitimacy from the "divine right" of kings to rule as God's representatives on earth.
 
5. My Own Mind is my Own Church by Thomas Pain  (1737-1809)
                                                  American Revolutionary writer and pamphleteer.

His work the Age of Reason (published in three parts in 1794, 1795, and 1807) was a bestseller in America. At the beginning of Part I, Paine lays out his personal creed:

  • I believe in one God, and no more; and I hope for happiness beyond this life.

  • I believe in the equality of man; and I believe that religious duties consist in doing justice, loving mercy, and endeavoring to make our fellow-creatures happy.

  • But, lest it should be supposed that I believe many other things in addition to these, I shall, in the progress of this work, declare the things I do not believe, and my reasons for not believing them.

  • I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church, by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church.

  • All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.

  • I do not mean by this declaration to condemn those who believe otherwise; they have the same right to their belief as I have to mine. But it is necessary to the happiness of man that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe.

    Paine's creed encapsulates many of the major themes of the rest of his text: a firm belief in a creator-God who ended his involvement in earthly matter after the act of creation (deism); a skepticism regarding most supernatural claims, here, in the afterlife, and later in the text, miracles); a conviction that virtues should be derived from a consideration for others rather than oneself; an animus against corrupt religious institutions; and an emphasis on the individual's right of conscience.

 
6. Church and Religion by Robert G. Ingersoll (1833-1899)
                                        American lawyer, orator, statesman.
  • Every church that has a standard higher than human welfare is dangerous.
  • True religion is not a theory--it is a practice. It is not a creed--it is a life. True religion is subordination of the passions to the perceptions of the intellect.
  • Religion has not civilized man--man has civilized religion.
  • Religion does not consist in worshipping gods, but in aiding the well-being, the happiness of man. No human being knows whether any gods exist or not. All that has been said and written about "our god" or the gods of other people has no known fact or foundation. Words without thoughts, clouds without rain. Let us put theology out of religion.
  • Religion and morality have nothing in common, and yet there is no religion except the practice of morality. What you call religion is simply superstition.
  • Real religion means the doing of justice. Real religion means the giving to others every right you claim for yourself. Real religion consists in duties of man to man, in feeding the hungry, in clothing the naked, in defending the innocent, and in saying what you believe to be true.
  • A religion that does not command the respect of the greatest minds will, in a little while, excite the mockery of all.

7. A Naturalist's Vow by Robert G. Ingersoll (1833 - 1899)

[Note: With respect to religion, a naturalist holds that it does not depend on supernatural experience, divine revelation, etc., and that all religious truth may be derived from the natural world.]

A Naturalist's Vow

  • When I became convinced that the universe is natural - that all the ghosts and gods are myths, there entered into my brain, into my soul, into every drop of my blood, the sense, the feeling, the joy of freedom.

  • The walls of my prison crumbled and fell, the dungeon was flooded with light and all the bolts, and bars, and manacles became dust. I was no longer a servant, a serf or a slave. There was for me no master in all the world - not even in infinite space.

  • I was free - free to think, to express my thoughts - free to live to my own ideal - free to live for myself and those I loved - free to use all my faculties, all my senses, free to spread imagination's wings

  •  - free to investigate, to guess and dream and hope - free to judge and determine for myself - free to reject all ignorant and cruel creeds, all the "inspired" books that savages have produced, and all the barbarous legends of the past

  •  - free from popes and priests - free from all the "called" and "set apart" - free from sanctified mistakes and "holy" lies - free from the fear of eternal pain - free from the winged monsters of the night - free from devils, ghosts and gods.

  • For the first time I was free. There were no prohibited places in all the realms of thought - no air, no space, where fancy could not spread her painted wings - no chains for my limbs - no lashes for my back - no fires for my flesh - no master's frown or threat - no following another's steps - no need to bow, or cringe, or crawl, or utter lying words. I was free. I stood erect and fearlessly, joyously faced all worlds.

  • And then my heart was filled with gratitude, with thankfulness, and went out in love to all the heroes, the thinkers, who gave their lives for the liberty of hand and brain - for the freedom of labor and thought - to those who fell on the fierce fields of war, to those who died in dungeons bound with chains - to those who proudly mounted scaffold's stairs - to those by fire consumed - to all the wise, the good, the brave of every land, whose thoughts and deed have given freedom to the sons of men. And then I vowed to grasp the torch that they have held and hold it high that light may conquer darkness still.

8. Religious Freedom (Separation of Church and State)

    by Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) 3rd President of the United States

An Act for Establishing Religious Freedom [1779]

Passed in the Assembly of Virginia in the beginning of the year 1786.

Well aware that Almighty God hath created the mind free; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments or burdens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the Holy Author of our religion, who being Lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time; that to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical; that even the forcing him to support this or that.... [missing text]
Be it therefore enacted by the General Assembly, That no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions of belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in nowise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities.

And though we well know this Assembly, elected by the people for the ordinary purposes of legislation only, have no power to restrain the acts of succeeding assemblies, constituted with the powers equal to our own, and that therefore to declare this act irrevocable, would be of no effect in law, yet we are free to declare, and do declare, that the rights hereby asserted are of the natural rights of mankind, and that if any act shall be hereafter passed to repeal the present or to narrow its operation such act will be an infringement of natural right. 
                                             
9. Concerning Religious Tolerance by Algernon Black (1900-93)
Why not let people differ about their answers to the great mysteries of the Universe? Let each seek one's own way to the highest, to one's own sense of supreme loyalty in life, one's ideal of life. Let each philosophy, each world-view bring forth its truth and beauty to a larger perspective, that people may grow in vision, stature and dedication.

The religions of humanity should be a unifying force, for all the great religions reveal a basic unity in ethics. Whether it be Judaism, Catholicism, Protestantism, Buddhism or Confucianism, all grow out of a sense of the sacredness of human life. This moral sensitivity to the sacredness of human personality -- the Commandments not to kill, not to hurt, not to put a stumbling block in the path of the blind, not to neglect the widow or the fatherless, not to exploit the servant or the worker -- all this can be found in the Bibles of humanity, in all the sacred books. All teach in substance: "Do unto others as you would that others should do unto you." There is, then, a basic unity among the great religions in the matter of ethics. True, there are religious philosophies which turn people away from the world, from the here and now, concentrating life-purposes on salvation for one's self or a mystic union with some supernatural reality. But most of the great religions agree on mercy, justice, love -- here on earth. And they agree that the great task is to move people from apathy, from an acceptance of the evils in life, to face the possibilities of the world, to make life sweet for one another instead of bitter. This is the unifying ethical task of all the religions -- yes, of all the philosophies of humankind. There is no need to force our own theological points of view upon one another or to insist that the moral life grows out of final, absolute authority.
 
10. The Heretical Sayings of Pope Boniface VIII, reigned from 1294-1303
For these remarks he was posthumously tried from 1303-1311. The trial ended without
a decision. However, either he or his accusers were freethinkers for claiming:
  • The Christian religion is a human invention like the faith of the Jews and the Arabs;
  • The dead will rise just as little as my horse which died yesterday;
  • Mary, when she bore Christ, was just as little a virgin as my own mother when she gave birth to me;
  • Sex and the satisfaction of natural drives is as little a sin as hand washing;
  • Paradise and hell only exist on earth; the healthy, rich and happy people live in the earthly paradise, the poor and the sick are in the earthly hell;
  • The world will exist forever, only we do not;
  • Any religion and especially Christianity does not only contain some truth, but also many errors. The long list of Christian untruth includes trinity, the virgin birth, the godly nature of Jesus, the eucharistic transformation of bread and wine into the body of Christ and the resurrection of the dead.
 
B.                    Freethinkers on the Existence of God
 
11. The Origins of the God Idea by A. Einstein (1879-1955)
 
During the youthful period of mankind’s spiritual evolution human fantasy created gods in man’s own image, who, by the operation of their will were supposed to determine, or at any rate to influence, the phenomenal world. Man thought to alter the disposition of the gods in his own favor by means of magic and prayer. The idea of God in the religions taught at present is a sublimation of that old concept of the gods. Its anthropomorphic character is shown, for instance, by the fact that men appeal to the Divine Being in prayers and plead for the fulfillment of their wishes.
            Ideas and Opinions, New York: Bonanza Books, 1954, p.46.
 
 

I cannot conceive of a personal God who would directly influence the actions of individuals, or would directly sit in judgment on creatures of his own creation. I cannot do this in spite of the fact that mechanistic causality has, to a certain extent, been placed in doubt by modern science.

Written on a letter dated August 5, 1927 in which Einstein is questioned whether or not he believes in a personal God.

It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal god and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious, then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.

Einstein's answer on March 24, 1954 to a letter from "a self-made man."

 
12. A Critique of the Religious Teaching of Ethics by A. Einstein
 
In their struggle for the ethical good, teachers of religion must have the stature to give up the doctrine of a personal God, that is, give up that source of fear and hope which in the past placed such vast power in the hands of priests. In their labors they will have to avail themselves of those forces which are capable of cultivating the Good, the True, and the Beautiful in humanity itself. This is, to be sure, a more difficult but an incomparably more worthy task (my emphasis).
                                                                          Ibid p. 48

The ethical behavior of man is better based on sympathy, education, and social relationships, and requires no support from religion. Man's plight would, indeed, be sad if he had to be kept in order through fear of punishment and hope of rewards after death.

It is, therefore, quite natural that the churches have always fought against science and have persecuted its supporters.

 
"Religion and Science," New York Times Magazine, November 9, 1930
 
13. A Psychoanalysis of Religion and the God Idea
             By Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) Founder of psychoanalysis
 
Ignorance is ignorance; no right to believe anything is derived from it. No reasonable man will behave so frivolously in other matters or rest content with such feeble grounds for his opinions or for the attitude he adopts; it is only in the highest and holiest things that he allows this. In reality these are only attempts to delude oneself or other people into the belief that one still holds fast to religion, when one has long cut loose from it. Where questions of religion are concerned people are guilty of every possible kind of insincerity and intellectual misdemeanor.
 
We say to ourselves: it would indeed be very nice if there were a God, who was both creator of the world and a benevolent providence, if there were a moral world order and a future life, but at the same time it is very odd that this is all just as we would wish it ourselves. And it would be still odder if our poor, ignorant, enslaved ancestors had succeeded in solving all these difficult riddles of the universe.
                                             The Future of an Illusion (my emphases)
 
 
 
Religion is an attempt to get control over the sensory world, in which we are placed, by means of the wish-world which we have developed insight us as a result of biological and psychological necessities. . . . If one attempts to assign to religion its place in man’s evolution, it seems not so much a lasting acquisition, as a parallel to the neurosis which the civilized individual must pass through on his way from childhood to maturity.
 
The God-Creator is openly called Father. Psychoanalysis concludes that he really is the father, clothed in the grandeur in which he once appeared to the small child. The religious man’s picture of the creation of the universe is the same as his picture of his own creation
        New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis (my emphases)
 
 
14. The Bible, the Word of a God or a Damon? by Thomas Paine
Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and tortuous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness, with which more than half the Bible is filled it would be more consistent that we call it the word of a demon than the word of God. It is a history of wickedness that has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind.
 
15. The Study of Theology is Futile by Thomas Pain
 
The study of theology, as it stands in Christian churches, is the study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it rests on no principles; it proceeds by no authorities; it has no data; it can demonstrate nothing; and it admits of no conclusion. Not any thing can be studied as a science, without our being in possession of the principles upon which it is founded; and as this is not the case with Christian theology, it is therefore the study of nothing.

16. Comments on Freedom, God, and Religion

        By Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) 3rd President of the United States

  • We hold these truth to be sacred and undeniable; that all man are created equal and independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent and inalienable, among which are the preservation of life, and liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
              Original draft of the Declaration of Independence
  • It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God.

  • It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself.

  • He is less remote from the truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong.

  • If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.

  • I have recently examined all the known superstitions of the world, and do not find in our particular superstition (Christianity) one redeeming feature. They are all alike, founded upon fables and mythologies. The Christian God is a being of terrifying character -- cruel, vindictive, capricious and unjust. In every country and every age the priest has been hostile to liberty.

  • Is uniformity attainable? Millions of innocent men, women, and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced an inch towards uniformity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half the world fools, and the other half hypocrites. To support roguery and error all over the earth.

 

17. The Trinity Explained by Robert G. Ingersoll (1833-1899)

The Trinity is in Christian theology the dogma of the union of the three divine persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, in one godhead or a three-personed God. To many, this idea is unintelligible, but Ingersoll elucidates its implications and reaches a conclusion.

The Trinity

  • Christ, according to the faith, is the second person in the Trinity, the Father being the first and the Holy Ghost third. Each of these persons is God. Christ is his own father and his own son. The Holy Ghost is neither father nor son, but both.

  • The son was begotten by the father, but existed before he was begotten--just the same before as after. Christ is just as old as his father, and the father is just as young as his son.

  • The Holy Ghost proceeded from the Father and Son, but was equal to the Father and Son before he proceeded, that is to say, before he existed, but he is of the same age as the other two.

  • So it is declared that the Father is God, and the Son and the Holy Ghost God, and these three Gods make one God.

  • According to the celestial multiplication table, once one is three, and three time one is one, and according to heavenly subtraction if we take two from three, three are left. The addition is equally peculiar: if we add two to one we have but one. Each one equal to himself and to the other two. Nothing ever was, nothing ever can be more perfectly idiotic and absurd than the dogma of the Trinity.

18. Believe vs. Inquiry by H. Heine and Anonymous

If you wish to strive for peace of soul and pleasure, then believe;
if you wish to be a devotee of truth, then inquire.
                                                               Heinrich Heine (1797-1856)
 
An anonymous source laments on a like saying:
There lies the rub. Beliefs often time give the appearance of pleasure and peace, because beliefs are almost always personal and subjective and don't push back. People typically believe in those things that make them happy, alleviate their fears, give them hope, and promise to fulfill their wishes and dreams. Life-after-death, living in eternal Paradise with all your loved ones, seventy-two virgins, inheriting a vibrant young 'spiritual' body, all arcane knowledge revealed, seeing wicked people get theirs', escaping eternal punishment — these are just some of the things that motivate people to believe. It's understandable. The promises are tempting, the endings neat and tidy.

     Seeking truth and knowledge, on the other hand, typically produces the opposite effect by eventually uncovering the self-deception and denial underlying most untested belief systems. This can be devastating. It is not a pleasant thing to witness the whole house of cards come tumbling down or watch peace-of-mind slip further out over the horizon. No wonder most people are so adamant about clinging to their beliefs, sometimes even willing to die for them. Who wants to admit denial, deception, and defeat? Who wants to pick themselves up, slap off the dust, and start over from scratch? Who wants to live in doubt, uncertainty, and the knowledge of impending demise? No, believing in the supernatural seems much more pleasant. It's often easier to believe in the magic of the Tooth Fairy than it is to simply extract the tooth.

 

C.                          Darwin on His "Religious Belief"

Extracts from the only complete edition of The Autobiography of Charles Darwin (1809-1882). With original omissions restored. Edited by his grand-daughter, Nora Barlow (1958), (my subheadings below).

 

19. On the Old Testament (p.71)

DURING THESE two years [1836-1839] I was led to think much about religion. Whilst on board the Beagle I was quite orthodox, and I remember being heartily laughed at by several of the officers (though themselves orthodox) for quoting the Bible as an unanswerable authority on some points of morality. I suppose it was the novelty of the argument that amused them. But I had gradually come, by this time, to see that the Old Testament from its manifestly false history of the world, with the Tower of Babel, the rainbow as a sign, etc., etc., and from its attributing to God the feelings of a revengeful tyrant, was no more to be trusted than the sacred books of the Hindoos, or the beliefs of any barbarian. The question then continually rose before my mind and would not be banished,--is it credible that if God were now to make a revelation to the Hindoos, would he permit it to be connected with the belief in Vishnu, Siva, &c., as Christianity is connected with the Old Testament. This appeared to me utterly incredible.

20. On the New Testament (p.71-72)

By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which Christianity is supported,--that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible do miracles become,--that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us,--that the Gospels cannot be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events,--that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eye-witnesses;--by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation. The fact that many false [contradictory] religions have spread over large portions of the earth like wild-fire had some weight with me. Beautiful as is the morality of the New Testament, it can hardly be denied that its perfection depends in part on the interpretation which we now put on metaphors and allegories.

 

21. On Everlasting Punishment (p.72)

But I was very unwilling to give up my belief;--I feel sure of this for I can well remember often and often inventing daydreams  of old letters between distinguished Romans and manuscripts being discovered at Pompeii or elsewhere which confirmed in the most striking manner all that was written in the Gospels. But I found it more and more difficult, with free scope given to my imagination, to invent evidence which would suffice to convince me. Thus disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate, but was at last complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress, and have never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion was correct. In can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the text seems to show that the men who do not believe, and this would include my Father, Brother and almost all my best friends, will be everlastingly punished.

     And this is a damnable doctrine. 

22. On the Argument from Design (p.73)

 

Although I did not think much about the existence of a personal God until a considerably later period of my life, I will here give the vague conclusion to which I have been driven. The old argument of design in nature, as given by Paley, which formerly seemed to me so conclusive, fails, now that the law of natural selection has been discovered. We can no longer argue that, for instance, the beautiful hinge of a bivalve shell must have been made by an intelligent being, like the hinge of a door by a man. There seems to be no more design in the variability of organic beings and in the action of natural selection, than in the course which the wind blows. Everything in nature is the result of fixed laws. But I have discussed this subject at the end of my book on the Variation of Domestic Animals and Plants, and the argument there given has never, as far as I can see, been answered.

23. On Suffering in This World (p.75)
That there is much suffering in the world no one disputes. Some have attempted this in reference to man by imagining that it serves for his moral improvement. But the number of men in the world is as nothing compared with that of all other sentient beings, and these suffer greatly without any moral improvement. A being so powerful and so full of knowledge as a God who could create the universe, is to our finite minds omnipotent and omniscient, and it revolts our understanding to suppose that his benevolence is not unbounded, for what advantage can there be in the sufferings of millions of the lower animals throughout almost endless time? This very old argument fro the existence of suffering against the existence of an intelligent first cause seems to me a strong one; whereas, as just remarked, the presence of much suffering agrees well with the view that all organic beings have been developed through variation and natural selection.

 

24. On the Argument from Subjective Certitude (p.75-78)
At the present day the most usual argument for the existence of an intelligent God is drawn from the deep inward conviction and feeling which are experienced by most persons. But it cannot be doubted that Hindoos, Mahomadans and others might argue in the same manner and with equal force in favor of the existence of one God, or of many Gods, or as with the Buddists of no God. There are also many barbarian tribes who cannot said with any truth to believe in what we call God: they believe indeed in spirits or ghosts, and it can be explained, as Tyler and Herbert Spencer have shown, how such a belief would be likely to arise. . .
     This argument would be a valid one if all men of all races had the same inward conviction of the existence of one God; but we know that this is very far from being the case. Therefore I cannot see that such inward convictions and feelings are of any weight as evidence of what really exists. . ., it can hardly be advanced as an argument for the existence of God, anymore than the powerful though vague and similar feelings excited by music. . . Nor must we overlook the probability of the constant inculcation in a belief in God on the minds of children producing so strong and perhaps an inherited effect on their brains not yet fully developed, that it would be as difficult for them to throw off their belief in God, as for a monkey to throw off its instinctive fear and hatred of a snake.
 
25. On Life Without a Personal God (p.78)
A man who has no assured and ever present believe in the existence of a personal God or of future existence with retribution and reward, can for his rule of life, as far as I can see, only to follow those impulses and instincts which are the strongest or which seem to him the best ones. A dog acts in this manner, but he does so blindly. A man, on the other hand, looks forwards and backwards, and compares his various feelings, desires and recollections. He then finds, in accordance with the verdict of all the wisest men that the highest satisfaction is derived from following certain impulses, namely the social instinct. If he acts for the good of others, he will receive the approbation of his fellow men and gain the love of those with whom he lives; and this latter gain undoubtedly is the highest pleasure on this earth. By degrees it will become intolerable to him to obey his sensuous passions rather than his higher impulses, which when rendered habitual may be almost called instincts. His reason may occasionally tell him to act in opposition to the opinions of others, whose approbation he will then not receive; but he will still have the solid satisfaction of knowing that he has followed his innermost guide or conscience.--As for myself I belief that I have acted rightly in steadily following and devoting my life to science.
 
D.           Thoughts and Quotes from Antiquity to Modernity
                                      (Arranged chronologically)
 
Xenophanes (570?-480? BCE) Greek Ionian Philosopher
  • . . . if oxen and horses or lions had hands, and could paint with their hands, horses would paint the forms of gods like horses, and oxen like oxen.
Confucius (ca. 551-479) China's most famous teacher, philosopher, and political theorist. His ethical teachings were introduced into Chinese religion. They emphasized devotion to parents, family, and friends, cultivation of the mind, self-control, and just social activity rather than sacred duties, ritual, and prayer.
  • If you are not able to serve men, how can you worship the gods?
  • Ignorance is the night of the mind, a night without moon or star.
Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama (563?-483? BCE) Founder of Buddhism
  • Believe nothing, O monks,
    merely because you have been told it ...
    or because it is traditional,
    or because you yourselves have imagined it.
    Do not believe what your teacher tells you
    merely out of respect for the teacher.
    But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis,
    you find to be conducive to the good,
    the benefit, the welfare of all beings
    that doctrine believe and cling to,
    and take it as your guide.
Protagoras (481?-411? BCE) Greek philosopher
  • Homo Mensura: Man is the measure of all things, of things that are that they are, and of things that are not that they are not.
  • Concerning the gods, I am not able to discover whether they exist or do not exist, nor what they are like; for the factors preventing knowledge are many: the obscurity of the subject and the shortness of human life  (in his work On the Gods).
Socrates (470?-399 BCE) Greek philosopher and teacher
  • Whom do I call educated? First, those who manage well the circumstances they encounter day by day. Next, those who are decent and honorable in their intercourse with all men, bearing easily and good naturedly what is offensive in others and being as agreeable and reasonable to their associates as is humanly possible to be... those who hold their pleasures always under control and are not ultimately overcome by their misfortunes... those who are not spoiled by their successes, who do not desert their true selves but hold their ground steadfastly as wise and sober -- minded men.
  • I am a citizen, not of Athens or Greece, but of the world.
  • In the Euthyphro Socrates raises the problem: Is a thing good simply because the gods say it is? Or do the gods say a thing is good because of some other quality it has? If so, what is that quality?
Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) formulated the problem this way:
If you are quite sure there is a difference between right and wrong, you are then in this situation: Is that difference due to God's fiat or is it not? If it is due to God's fiat, then for God Himself there is no difference between right and wrong, and it is no longer a significant statement to say that God is good. If you are going to say, as theologians do, that God is good, you must then say that right and wrong have some meaning which is independent of God's fiat, because God's fiats are good and not good independently of the mere fact that he made them. If you are going to say that, you will then have to say that it is not only through God that right and wrong came into being, but that they are in their essence logically anterior to God.
 
Aristotle (384-322) Greek philosopher and scientist
  • A tyrant must put on the appearance of uncommon devotion to religion. subjects are less apprehensive of illegal treatment from a ruler whom they consider god-fearing and pious. On the other hand, they do less easily move against him, believing that he has the gods on his side.
Cicero (106-43 BCE) Roman statesman and philosopher
  • A happy life consists of tranquility of mind.
  • Superstition is a senseless fear of God.
  • Our minds possess by nature an insatiable desire to know the truth.
  • To think is to live.
  • Freedom is participation in power
  • Only in states in which the power of the people is supreme has liberty an abode.
  • We were born to unite with our fellow men, and to join in community with the human race.
Seneca (4 BCE-65 CE) Roman moralist, Stoic Philosopher
  • Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.
  • The time will come when our posterity will wonder at our ignorance of things so plain.
  • It is proof of a bad cause when it is applauded by the mob.
Tertullian (160?-230? CE) Prominent Church Father, theologian, born in Carthage
  • However, it is a fundamental human right, a privilege of nature, that every man should worship according to his own convictions; one man's religion neither harms nor helps another man.  It is assuredly no part of religion to compel religion - to which freewill and not force should lead us - the sacrificial victims even being required of a willing mind.  You will render no real service to your gods by compelling us to sacrifice.  For they can have no desire of offerings from the unwilling, unless they are animated by a spirit of contention, which is a thing altogether undivine.*
  • So we, who are united in mind and soul, have no hesitation about sharing property. All is common among us--except our wives. Apology, 39.
  • The land is no man's inheritance; none shall possess it as property. Apology, 39.
*Condemned in the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX sixteen centuries later.
 
Pope Leo X (reigned 1513-1521)
  • What profit has not that fable of Christ brought us!
William Shakespeare (1564-1616) English "master" playwright, dramatist, and poet
  • In religion, what damned error but some sober brow will bless it, and approve it with a text, . . .?
  •  
                                                           The Merchant of Venice, Act III, Sc. II
  • Methinks sometimes I have no more wit than a Christian.
                                                                           Twelfth Night, Act I, Sc. III
  • His worst fault is, he's given to prayer; he is something peevish that way.
                                                       The Merry Wives of Windsor, Act I, Sc. IV
  • Modest doubt is call'd the beacon of the wise.
                                                                 Troilus and Cressida, Act II, Sc. II
 
 
 
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) Italian astronomer, mathematician, physicist. Also known as
                    "the Father of Modern Science" for he pioneered the scientific method.
  • I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who endowed us with sense,  reason, and intellect had intended for us to forgo their use.
  • In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.
  • They know that it is human nature to take up causes whereby a man may oppress his neighbor, no matter how unjustly. ... Hence they have had no trouble in finding men who would preach the damnability and heresy of the new doctrine from the very pulpit...
  • I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the Scriptures, but with experiments, and demonstrations.
  • To command the professors of astronomy to confute their own observations is to enjoin an impossibility, for it is to command them not to see what they do see, and not to understand what they do understand, and to find what they do not discover.
  • It vexes me when they would constrain science by the authority of the Scriptures, and yet do not consider themselves bound to answer reason and experiment.
  • It is surely harmful to souls to make it a heresy to believe what is proved.
  • His Holiness [the pope] has certainly an absolute power of admitting or condemning propositions not directly de Fide [of the faith], but it is not in the power of any creature to make them true or false otherwise than of their own nature and de facto they are.
Christopher Marlow (1564-93) English Dramatist and Poet
  • I count religion but a childish toy, and hold there is no sin but ignorance.

Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) French mathematician and devout Christian

  • Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.

 

Baruch Spinoza (1632-72) Dutch Philosopher (in a letter declining a  

                                     professorship at the University of Heidelberg)

  • I do not know how to teach philosophy without becoming a disturber of established religion.

Jean de la Bruyere (1645-96) French essayist and moralist.
  • Life is a tragedy for those who feel, and a comedy for those who think.
Jean Meslier (1664-1729) A Catholic Priest and early freethinker of the Enlightenment.
From his Last Testament, made public after his death because he did not want to be burned, and as summarized by Aram Vartanian:
He regarded government as a cynical alliance between shrewd exploiters and ambitious priests, made at the expense of the common people. While religion disarmed and subdued the latter by means of superstition and ritual, by false hopes and fake threats, the monarchs and nobles could oppress them economically and politically without fear or retaliation or revolt.
     Hence, Meslier insists:
  • Matter and energy moves itself. It has no exterior mover [his Last Testament includes the scientific worldview of his time].
  • Theology is but ignorance of natural causes reduced to a system.
  • Mankind shall not be free until the last king is strangled in the entrails of the last priest.
Voltaire (1694-1778) French philosopher
  • Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
  • It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.
  • When the speaker and he to whom he speaks do not understand, that is metaphysics.
  • The truths of religion are never so well understood as by those who have lost their power of reasoning.
  • If god created us in his image we have certainly returned the compliment.
  • Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool.
Benjamin Franklin (1706-90) statesman, scientist, inventor, and writer
  • You cannot reason a man out of a position he has not reasoned himself into.
  • God helps those who help themselves.
Denis Diderot (1713-1784) French philosopher
  • The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers.
  • Faith, in every country, is only a blind deference to the sentiments of the priests, who are always infallible where they are sufficiently powerful.
  • A religion is dangerous when it confounds our ideas of morality; a religion is false when it destroys the perfections of the Deity; a religion is detestable when it substitutes for its worship a vindictive demon instead of a beneficent God.
  • We attest what we have ourselves seen, or what we believe we have seen. When we attest what others have seen, we prove nothing, except that we are willing to believe them on their words. The whole fabric of Christianity is built on the authority of those who had formerly an interest in establishing it, and who now have an interest in maintaining it.
  • Reason tells us that when we commit crimes, it is men, and not God, that we injure; and common sense tells us that we injure ourselves when we give way to disorderly passions. The Christian religion teaches us to imitate a God that is cruel, insidious [sic], jealous, and implacable in his wrath. Christians! with such a model before you, what will be your morality? Can the God of Moses, of Joshua, and of David, be the God of an honest man?
  • Christians! in obeying your gospels to the letter, you will be neither citizens, husbands, fathers, friends, nor faithful subjects. You will be pilgrims on earth strangers in your own country fierce enemies to yourselves and your brethren, and your groans even will not leave you the hope of ever being happy.
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) German philosopher
  • To begin with, I take the following proposition to be a principle requiring no proof: Whatever, over and above good life-conduct, man fancies that he can do to become well-pleasing to God is mere religious illusion and pseudo-service to God.   
  • Nothing is divine but what is agreeable to reason.
  • We can swear by God without admitting his existence. To swear by God without admitting (affirming) his existence, simply indicates conscientiousness.
Thomas Pain  (1737-1809) American Revolutionary writer and pamphleteer.
 
 
  • Belief in a cruel God makes a cruel man.
  • One good schoolmaster is of more use than a hundred priests.
  • My country is the world, and my religion is to do good.

Edward Gibbon (1737-94) English historian.
  • To a philosophic eye, the vices of the clergy are far less dangerous than their virtues.
 
 
Nicolas Chamfort (1741-94) French writer.
  • I once heard an orthodox person denouncing those who discuss articles of faith: "Gentlemen" he said naively, "a true Christian does not examine what he is ordered to believe. Dogma is like a bitter pill: if you chew it, you will never be able to swallow it."
 
Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) 3rd President of the United States
  • All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.
     
  • It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
  • Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong.

  • If the obstacles of bigotry and priestcraft can be surmounted, we may hope that common sense will suffice to do everything else”

  • It is in our lives and not our words that our religion must be read.
  • The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus by the Supreme Being in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter.
  • Is uniformity [of belief] attainable? Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burned, tortured, fined and imprisoned; yet we have not advanced an inch towards uniformity. What has been the effect of this coercion? To make one half the world fools, and the other half hypocrites. To support roguery and error all over the world.
  • History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.
Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821) Emperor of France
  • Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.
  • Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich.
  • I am surrounded by priests who repeat incessantly that their kingdom is not of this world, and yet they lay their hands on everything they can get.
William Hazlitt (1778-1830)
  • Religion either makes men wise and virtuous, or it makes them set up false pretences to both.
Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) German Philosopher
  • Religion is the masterpiece of the art of animal training, for it trains people as to how they shall think.
  • Martyrdom is the only way a man can become famous without ability.
  • Religions are like glow worms; they require darkness to shine in.
Heinrich Heine (1797-1856) German lyric poet, critic.
  • In dark ages people are best guided by religion, as in a pitch-black night a blind man is the best guide; he knows the roads and path better than a man who can see. When daylight comes, however, it is foolish to use blind, old men as guides.
Victor Hugo (1802-85) French poet, novelist, and playwright
  • Conscience is God present in man.
  • I'm religiously opposed to religion.
  • An intelligent hell would be better than a stupid paradise.
  • Hell is an outrage on humanity. When you tell me that your deity made you in his image, I reply that he must have been very ugly.

Ludwig Feuerbach (1804-72) German philosopher. His most famous conclusion was that  the human being seeks its essence in another being: God. Thus human beings are alienated from themselves. They project perfected or idealized human qualities and wishes onto God whom they glorify as all-good, all-knowing, all-powerful, and immortal. Obviously to them, such a being can grant them like qualities; hence, they want to be on His side. 

  • The existence of religion is justifiable only in that it satisfies a psychological need; a person's existential preoccupation is with the self, and the worship of God is actually worship of an idealized self.
  • But God is not only an objectification of man's intellect, he also is a personification of man's moral conscience.
  • Religion is the dream of the human mind. But even in dreams we do not find ourselves in emptiness or in heaven, but on earth, in the realm of reality; we only see real things in the entrancing splendor of imagination and caprice, instead of in the simple daylight of reality and necessity.
  • To recognize the human origins of the divine predicates and to uphold at the same time the existence of an indefinable divine Being is to become a victim of modern unbelief.
  • The religious object of adoration is nothing but the objectified nature of him who adores.
  • My only wish is…to transform friends of God into friends of man, believers into thinkers, devotees of prayer into devotees of work, candidates for the hereafter into students of the world, Christians who, by their own procession and admission, are "half animal, half angel" into persons, into whole persons.
     And the philosopher Ben Kimpel (1905-90?) notes (my emphasis):
  • When Feuerbach . . . uses the symbol "god" he refers to human experience. For him, the term "god" designates an individual's most respected ideal. Hence, when the symbol "god" is used as Feuerbach uses it, no individual could be designated a "atheist": whatever an individual values most is for him the significance designated by the symbol "god."
 
Charles Darwin (1809-1882) English naturalist who originated the theory of evolution by descent with modification and natural selection.
 
  • I would as soon be descended from a baboon as from a savage who delights to torture his enemies, treats his wives like slaves, and is haunted by the grossest superstitions.
  • We must, however, acknowledge, as it seems to me, that man with all his noble qualities... still bears in his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin.
  • The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.
Karl Marx (1818-1883) German revolutionary, founder of scientific socialism
  • The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point, however, is to change it.            
  • The tradition of all the dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living.
  • Law, morality, religion are to him (the worker) so many bourgeois [exploiter class] prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests.
  • The demand to give up the illusions about its [life's] condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusion.
  • [However,] Criticism has plucked the imaginary flowers [illusions] from the chain not so that man will wear the chain without any fantasy or consolation but so that he will shake off the chain and cull the living flower.
Robert G. Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  • Take from the church the miraculous, the supernatural, the incomprehensible, the unreasonable, the impossible, the unknowable, and the absurd, and nothing but a vacuum remains.
  • Mental slavery is mental death, and every man who has given up his intellectual freedom is the living coffin of his dead soul.
  • In the history of the world, the man who is ahead has always been called a heretic.
  • Theology has always sent the worst to heaven, the best to hell.
  • The hands that help are better than the lips that pray.
Mark Twain (Samuel Longhorn, 1835-1910)
  • Man is the religious animal. He is the only religious animal. He is the only animal that has the True Religion –- several of them. He is the only animal that loves his neighbor as himself and cuts his throat, if his theology isn't straight. He has made a graveyard of the globe in trying his honest best to smooth his brother's path to happiness and heaven.
  • In religion and politics people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the questions at issue but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing [equal to one fourth of a penny].
Lyman Abbott (1835-1922) Congregational (self-governing Protestant church) minister
  • A student once came to me, saying, "I have lost my faith. I do not know whether there is a soul in my body or a God in the heavens."
         I replied: "I shall be glad to talk these questions over with you. But let us understand at the outset that if there is no soul in our body and no God in the heavens we want to know that fact. It would be a terrible truth; but any truth, however terrible, is better than any lie, however pleasant."
Emile Zola (1840-1902) French novelist, critic, and political activist.
  • Civilization will not attain to its perfection until the last stone from the last church falls on the last priest.
  •  ...but I affirm, with intense conviction, the Truth is on the march and nothing will stop it.
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) German philosopher.
  • The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments.
  • A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything.
  • In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.
  • Faith: not wanting to know what is true.
  • In Christianity neither morality nor religion come into contact with reality at any point.
  • One kind of honesty has been unknown to all founders of religions and their likes -- they have never made of their experiences a matter of conscience and knowledge. "What did I really experience? What happened in me and around me then? Was my mind sufficiently alert? Was my will bent against fantasy?" -- none of them has asked such questions, none of our dear religious people asks such questions even now: they feel, rather, a thirst for things which are contrary to reason and do not put too many difficulties in the way of satisfying it -- thus they experience "miracles" and "rebirths" and hear the voices of angels!
  • Who alone has reason to lie himself out of actuality ? He who suffers from it. But to suffer from actuality makes one an abortive actuality . . . the preponderance of feelings of displeasure over feelings of pleasure is the cause of a fictitious morality and religion . . .
  • The Christian resolution to find the world ugly and bad has made the world ugly and bad.
  • He that humbles himself wishes to be exalted.
  • I cannot believe in a God who wants to be praised all the time.
  • There never was more than one Christian, and he died on the Cross.
  • In heaven, all the interesting people are missing.
  • Is man one of God's blunders? Or is God one of man's blunders?
  • The "Kingdom of Heaven" is a condition of the heart - not something that comes "upon the earth" or "after death."
W. K. Clifford (1845-1879) English mathematician and philosopher.
  • It is always a crime against humanity for anyone, under any conditions, to believe anything with insufficient evidence.
  • If men were no better than their religion, the world would be a hell indeed.

  • [Religion] that awful plaque which has destroyed two civilizations.

Hans Vaihinger (1852-1933) German philosopher known for The Philosophy of 'As if'.
  • It is a satisfying Fiction for many to regard the world as if a more perfect Higher Spirit had created or at least regulated it. But this implies the supplementary Fiction of regarding a world of this sort as if the order created by the Higher Divine Spirit had been destroyed by some hostile force.
George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950) Irish dramatist, literary critic, and socialist.
                                 advocator, winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1925.
  • No man ever believes that the Bible means what it says. He is always convinced that it says what he means.
  • The conversion of Paul was no conversion at all: it was Paul who converted the religion that has raised one man above sin and death into a religion that delivered millionth [actually billionth] of men so completely into their dominion that their own common nature became a horror to them, and the religious life became a denial of life.
John Dewey (1859-1952) philosopher and educator, exponent of pragmatism.
  • The very problem of mind and body suggests division; I do not know of anything so disastrously affected by the habit of division as this particular theme. In its discussion are reflected the splitting off from each other of religion, morals and science; the divorce of philosophy from science and of both from the arts of conduct. The evils which we suffer in education, in religion, in the materialism of business and the aloofness of "intellectuals" from life, in the whole separation of knowledge and practice -- all testify to the necessity of seeing mind-body as an integral whole.
George Santayana (1863-1952) U.S. philosopher and writer
  • My atheism, like that of Spinoza, is true piety towards the universe and denies only gods fashioned by men in their own image, to be servants of their human interests.
     

Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) British philosopher, mathematician, and writer

  • The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.

  • The more intense has been the religion of any period and the more profound has been the dogmatic belief, the greater has been the cruelty and the worse has been the state of affairs.
  • Christ is not divine, and Christianity is a particularly cruel and inhuman religion [at least when viewed from the perspective of history].

  • What men want is not knowledge, but certainty.
                                                 

Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
 
  • Science can only determine what is, but not what shall be, and beyond its realm, value judgments remain indispensable. Religion, on the other hand, is concerned only with evaluating human thought and actions; it is not qualified to speak of real facts and the relationships between them.

  • Good science is created "only by those who are thoroughly imbued with the aspiration toward truth and understanding." A critic added, the same must surely apply to "good theology."

  • I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation and is but a reflection of human frailty.

  • I do not believe in immortality of the individual, and I consider ethics to be an exclusively human concern with no superhuman authority behind it.
  • I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil.
  • If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.
  • In order to be an immaculate member of a flock of sheep, one must above all be a sheep oneself.
  • Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
  • It was the experience of mystery - even if mixed with fear - that engendered religion.

 

Will Durant (1885-1981) U.S. author and historian

  • Religions are born and may die, but superstition is immortal.    Only the fortunate can take life without mythology.

Aldous Huxley (1894-1963)

  • At least two thirds of our miseries spring from human stupidity, human malice and those great motivators and justifiers of malice and stupidity, idealism, dogmatism and proselytizing zeal on behalf of religious or political idols.

George Orwell (1903-50) English writer

  • (Humankind) is not likely to salvage civilization unless he can evolve a system of good and evil which is independent of heaven and hell.

  • During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

  • If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.  

  • One cannot really be a Catholic and grown up.

Peter De Vries (1910-93) Editor and novelist

  • The idea of a Supreme Being who creates a world in which one creature is designed to eat another in order to subsist, and then passes a law saying "Thou shalt not kill," is so monstrously, immeasurably, bottomlessly absurd that I am at a loss to understand how mankind has entertained or given it house room all this long.

Hermann Bondi (1919-2005) Austrian-British Cosmologist

  • Religion is inherently divisive and a creator of separatism.

  • . . . many believers (including the leadership of most institutionalized religions) regard their faith, based on revelation, as "The Truth" applicable to all people everywhere and at all times. These persons view everyone who does not share their particular faith as in error. 

  • The monstrous arrogance of this outlook is hard to stomach. The wide variety of such faith and their mutual contradictions must mean that at most one of them can be right and all the others are wrong.

  • It follows logically that the human mind has a tendency to believe, sincerely and often with fervor, something that is false. To think that oneself and one's fellow believers in one's own faith are uniquely exempt from this general weakness is self-centeredness of stupendous magnitude.

Isaac Asimov (1920-92) Science writer

  • Religion cannot object to science on moral grounds. The history of religious intolerance forbids it.

  • Any real comparison between what the Bible says and what the astronomer thinks shows us instantly that the two have virtually nothing in common.

Friedrich Dürrenmatt (1921-90) Swiss author and dramatist

  • What the world needs is not redemption from sin but redemption from hunger and oppression; it has no need to pin its hopes upon Heaven, it has everything to hope for from this earth.

Eugene Wesley "Gene" Roddenberry (1921-1991) Screenwriter Star Trek

  • We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing all-powerful God, who creates faulty humans, and then blames them for his own mistakes.

Paul Kurtz (b.1925) Philosopher of Democratic Secular Humanism
  • Since this life here and now is all we can know, our most reasonable option is to live it fully.
  • We should not accept a belief as true if there is a preponderance of evidence against it, if it is found rationally inconsistent with other well-founded beliefs, or both.
  • Perhaps many, even most, humans need to corrupt reality to get through life, but surely this does not apply to all human beings, some of whom can live autonomously with an existential awareness of the human condition, its finitude and fragility as well as its opportunity and promise.
  • Perhaps the passion for a transcendental life is so deeply ingrained or has such deep biological roots in human culture that men and women will continue to devote time and energy to venerating false gods and sanctifying false hopes of an afterlife.
Edward O. Wilson (b.1929) Scientist, naturalist, philosopher.
  • Scientists should "offer the hand of friendship" to religious leaders and build an alliance with them because "Science and religion are two of the most potent forces on Earth and they should come together to save the creation."
George Hamilton Smith (b.1949) Libertarian and free-thought writer.
  • In exchange for obedience, Christianity promises salvation in an afterlife; but in order to elicit obedience through this promise, Christianity must convince men that they need salvation, that there is something to be saved from. Christianity has nothing to offer a happy man living in a natural, intelligible universe. If Christianity is to gain a motivational foothold, it must declare war on earthly pleasure and happiness, and this, historically, has been its precise course of action. In the eyes of Christianity, man is sinful and helpless in the face of God, and is potential fuel for the flames of hell. Just as Christianity must destroy reason before it can introduce faith, so it must destroy happiness before it can introduce salvation.
 
 
Rudolf Kuhr (b. ?) German philosopher of secular humanism.
  • "Those who doubt the faith, are already lost," we are often told by the religious. And indeed, in most organized religions skeptical or critical thinkers are treated as dangerous deviants. Hence, the flourishing of our humaneness is obstructed and the further development of individuality and communality is made most difficult.

Bill Gates (b.1956) U.S. entrepreneur

  • Just in terms of allocation of time resources, religion is not very efficient. There's a lot more I could be doing on a Sunday morning.

Roberts, Stephen F.

  • I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.

Anonymous
  • Religion to solve life's problem is like offering a glass of water to a drowning man.
  • Religion and transcendental philosophy helps one to endure the sufferings of others by distracting one's attention from them. It makes a virtue of callousness.