|
V.4 Origins and Growth of Christianity
Until the Protestant Reformation in the 16th Century,
This is Mostly about the Roman Catholic Version
of Christianity
Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
George Santayana (1863-1952) He who begins by loving Christianity better than Truth, will proceed by loving his own sect or Church better than Christianity, and end in loving himself better than all. S. T. Coleridge (1772-1834) in Aids to Reflection. Jesus of Nazareth was executed as a political enemy of the oppressive Roman Empire. But Paul--a Roman citizen and self-appointed Apostle of Jesus--stood Jesus's teaching on its head when he preached slavish obedience and threatened: "they that resisteth shall receive to themselves damnation" (Romans 13:1-2). And Paulinism* under the name of Christianity was eventually accepted as a friend and supporter of the Roman Empire and became its and other tyrannical "powers that be" from the top imposed state religion. *14 of the 27 parts of the New Testament are credited to Paul. This writer Introduction A. Early Christianity and the "Historical" Jesus 1. Key Events and Intro to the Gospels 2. The Life Events of Jesus 3. The Ethical Teachings of Jesus 4. The Wicked Teachings of Jesus 5. The Theology of Jesus B. Reformed Christianity and the Deified Jesus 6. Paulinization Makes Faith Palatable to Gentiles and the Powerful 7. Hellenization Reforms the Faith and Deifies Jesus 8. Key Events prior to the Christian 4th Century C. Institutionalized Christianity and the Monopolized Jesus 9. The Institutionalization and Imposition of Christianity 10. Political Victory Paves the Way for the Practices of Brahmanism 11. The Emerging Papacy and Its Claim to Own Jesus' Church 12. The Papacy's High Point under Boniface the "Freethinker" D. Actualized Christianity--Pernicious Pursuits in the Name of Jesus 13. The Growth and Corruption of the Papacy (6th-17th cent.) 14. The Persecution and Massacres of Jews 15. The Crusades Against Moslems, Pagans, and Other Christians 16. The Inquisition 17. The Witchcraft Trials (1330-1700) 18. The Reformation and Counter-Reformation 19. The Peasant's Revolt, Luther's Betrayal and Slave Morality E. Enslaving, Colonizing, Proselytizing in the Name of Christianity 20. Theological and Biblical "Justification" for Slavery 21. Slavery from 107 CE to 1888 CE 22. The Colonization of Latin America 23. The First 20th Century Genocide in German South-West Africa 24. Proselytizing by God's Chinese Son Causes 20 Million Death Introduction For better and worse, Christianity has been most influential since the 4th century in shaping Western culture and world events. Moreover, there is evidence that in future this influence will increase rather than diminish. And since this will effect all earthlings, it is well-justified to spent more time and take a closer look at this particular world religion and its dominant advocate and world power, the Roman Catholic* Church. And the Catholic Encyclopedia substantiates the preceding statement when it asserts: · No one who is interested in human history, past and present, can ignore the Catholic Church, either as an institution which has been the central figure in the civilized world for nearly two thousand years, decisively affecting its destinies, religious, literary, scientific, social and political, or as an existing power whose influence and activity extend to every part of the globe. · In the past century the Church as grown both extensively and intensively among English-speaking peoples. · Their living interests demand that they should have the means of informing themselves about this vast institution, which, whether they are Catholics or not, affects their fortunes and their destiny (my emphases and bullets). This chapter contains critical information for people everywhere about this “vast institution” since it “affects their fortunes and their destiny.” There is a need for this text because much of the info disseminated by the Roman Church seems to be self-servingly “mistaken” and is often outright false and contradictory. All this had pernicious consequences in the past as demonstrated by historical facts. Moreover, there is strong evidence that some of these calamities are still with us. Hence, an objective, and for the most part verifiable, account of this religious and political world power is urgently needed. *the term catholic originated from the Greek katholikos, “universal” and from katholou, “in general.” The technical use of the word seems to have been established by the beginning of the 3rd century. What the term catholic is claimed to entail was expressed by the French theologian Vincent of Lérins as follows: “That which has been believed everywhere, always, and by all. This is what is truly and properly catholic.” By taking over the Hebrew scriptures as their own legitimate heritage, Christians (and Muslims later) were able to show to their own satisfaction that their faith could be traced back to the very beginning of Creation itself. Also, they appropriated the God of this work, Abraham's God, as their very own. Moreover, they labeled the Hebrew scriptures as the "Old Testament" because with the coming of Christ the Messiah, as predicted in these scriptures, a new contract, the New Testament, made the Hebrew contract or testament with God obsolete. Note that The New Testament writings are not considered in the classical sense “historical.” To really understand a tradition such as Christianity and its most dominant institution, is to know their history--their origins and development over time. Among the 6,000 million Earthlings now living, 1/3 or 2,000 million are at least nominally Christians. And over 1/2 of these Christians are Catholics while the other half belongs to the Eastern Orthodox Church and some 33,000 distinct and separate Protestant churches. So, Roman Catholicism is by far the largest group. But more importantly, it is historically and presently by far the most influential religion, and its past indicates that it is capable of doing great evil while appearing innocently doing the work of God. To avoid in future the horrendous atrocities, wars, and rotten compromises between church and state debited to mostly Catholic Christianity, one must link these events to their justification by the Church hierarchy that was often based on the writings of the Bible and that of its leading theologians. While much of this writing below applies to all of Christianity, a substantial part is an analysis and critique of the Roman Church and its fundamental mission to convert the whole of humanity, if necessary by force, not to Christianity but to Catholicism. This writing is not a criticism of Christians who are like most believers of other religions perhaps misguided but substantially innocent. In any case, almost all are morally better than their religion because they practice what makes living in communities possible. These are The Common Moral Decencies, which are rules of behavior that have naturally developed everywhere and long before organized religion appeared. However, Christians and other believers should consult their conscience, for through their allegiance, they at least indirectly support the goals and actions of their religion. To help organized Christianity in general and Roman Catholicism in particular, so that they can learn from mistakes of the past and reform accordingly, is the main intend of this text besides informing the reader. For a critique of concepts see: Egregious Errors in Religions Abuse of Children in Religions Hatred of Women in Religions Probing Supernatural Claims Intellectual Giants Critical of Religion A. Early Christianity and the "Historical" Jesus 1. Key Events and Intro to the Gospels 2. The Life Events of Jesus 3. The Ethical Teachings of Jesus 4. The Wicked Teachings of Jesus 5. The Theology of Jesus 1. Key Events and Intro to the Gospels Around 30 CE Christianity had its beginnings when the ca. 30 year old Jesus of Nazareth emerged. He was probably a Galilean Jew, but little else is known about him prior to that appearance. He was a charismatic, wandering preacher who lived between 6-3 BCE to 30 or 33 CE. Also, Jesus had the reputation of a healer, wonderworker, and exorcist. Judging from the Passovers mentioned in the Gospels, his missionary work lasted only 1-3 years. The "historical" Jesus was a practicing Jew, who taught that the social laws of the Hebrew Scriptures must be followed. He insists: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill" (Matthew 5:17) These laws implicitly condemned all exploitation, oppression and enslavement at least among the Hebrew people (see Judaism in The Most Influential Religions). The term "historical" above is in quotation marks because Jesus was a legendary not a historical figure, for we have no eyewitness reports of him. But most importantly, Jesus and his followers thought that he was the Messiah promised in the Hebrew Scriptures who would solve the perennial problems of the Hebrews and establish God's kingdom on earth. Jesus promised: Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the son of man coming in his kingdom (Mathew 16:28). Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled (Mathew 24:34). This "Before the end of the present generation . . . is also stated in the other two Synoptic Gospels (Luke 9:27; Mark 9:1). For wanting to establish a new kingdom he was crucified (ca. 33 CE) by the Roman Empire and after being found guilty of the political crime of sedition, the stirring up of discontent and rebellion, against the Roman Empire. He was not executed for a religious crime such as heresy by the Jews for which stoning would have been the appropriate measure at that time. But in addition to the tenets of Judaism, he also proclaimed ideas from a minor offspring of Judaism known as the Essenes. These concepts probably found their way into this sect from Buddhism and Zoroastrianism. It allowed Jesus to offer something new in Judaism, namely, a new ethics and the teaching in parables from Buddhism, and a new theology of last things (the last judgment, end of the world, etc.) and salvation leading to everlasting life from Zoroastrianism. But he also spoke of the end of the world and the coming of the eternal kingdom in such urgent manner that his followers clearly expected it to happen in their own lifetime. While Christianity is a historical fact, Jesus of Nazareth is not because there is no eyewitness account of him. However, there is good secondary evidence that he actually existed. His followers saw no need to write things down, for they believed his prophesy that the end was imminent. Moreover, most if not all members of his inner circle, the twelve apostles were illiterate who on the prediction of immanent doom had deserted their families to save their souls. From the mid 30s to 137 there was, initially as part of Judaism, a Judaic-Christian community in Jerusalem. It was the center of what would be later separated out as a new religion. But the center shifted to Rome under the influence of some leading apostles such as Paul for sure and perhaps Peter. And by 137, Judaic Christianity had completely disappeared or was absorbed by an intermediate Pauline Christianity that in turn was absorbed by the 4th century by an institutionalized Christianity. From the 50s to the 60th, Paul, initially a persecutor and killer of Christians, apparently concluded that if you cannot fight them, join them. He appointed himself as an apostle of Jesus of Nazareth and claimed that the dead Jesus commissioned him to interpret and spread his teachings. In the process he did not spiritually convert to Judaic Christianity but converted, "Paulinized," the faith. This action made the religion palatable to non-Jews and the authorities of the Roman Empire as well as emperors elsewhere. It was the groundwork on which in the 4th century Imperial Christianity would be build. Between the late 60s and early 100s, as the imminent end did not come, and as firsthand witnesses to Jesus' activities were dying, there arose the need to produce works that would testify to his life and teachings. It was during this time and this writing activity that the "historical" Jesus of Nazareth, a wandering religious teacher, became the mythological Jesus Christ or Jesus the Messiah. Many accounts or Gospels were written in, but only the four "authorized" Gospels "according to" Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John were retained in the Christian scriptures known as the New Testament. The authors of the Gospels apparently learned from the communities that were instructed by Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John. But these evangelists did not know Jesus personally. However, it is claimed that the information was somehow revealed to them by Jesus Christ. Intro to the Gospels Jesus' life events, ethics, teachings, and theology are found in the Synoptic gospels. However, neither Jesus nor his original disciples left any writings behind. Also, it is not known who wrote these gospels. The names now appearing as authors were attached late in the second century. The first three of the gospels of the New Testament, Mark, Matthew, and Luke are known as the Synoptic--meaning "at one look"--Gospels because they give a general view of the teaching and life of Jesus. "The religion of Jesus Christ is neither new nor strange," wrote Eusebius of Caesarea (ca. 283-371 CE) the early historian of the Christian Church (in Church History, Book IV). And this conclusion by Eusebius seems to be correct, for indeed Jesus' life and teachings are for the most part parallel and almost identical to that of older mythologies and religions. Recorded at least five hundred years earlier, Jesus' life events and ethics are that of the Buddha, and his theology is that of Zoroastrianism. These teachings had found their way into the Essenes (ca. 100 BCE-50 CE), a Jewish sect of ascetics and mystics of whom Jesus was apparently a learned member before he struck out to form his own sect. New are Jesus' apparently wicked teachings which are not found in those older religions though they have parallels in the Hebrew Scriptures. Also, new is the emphasis on a second coming to usher in the kingdom of God "Before the end of the present generation . . . which is stated in all three of the Synoptic Gospels (Mathew 16:28, 24:34; Luke 9:27; Mark 9:1) and also in Peter I, 4:7. However, this harshness and the failed prediction are not mentioned, glossed over, or explained away in the Gospel of John, the fourth gospel, thus, saving the faith by moving it in the direction of a mysterious plausibility. Note: All biblical quotes are from the King James Version and were checked against the German translation of the Bible by Martin Luther. 2. The Life Events of Jesus These events, and his ethics below, are found in the three synoptic gospels. Mark's is the oldest one (ca. 60 CE) and was probably the primary source for Mathew (ca. 70 CE) and Luke (ca. 80 CE). Mathew and Luke added material to Mark's account from a source known as "Q," from the German for Quelle (source) which does no longer exists. All three tell basically the same story, but the special interests these authors pursue reflect important differences. Mark's gospel starts with Jesus' adult life--there is no virgin birth. However, it was easy to add later all sorts of claims to make the faith competitive because it was initially an oral tradition. Hence, it was flexible when compared with the rigidity of the later written accounts. The life of Jesus parallels that of older mythologies and religions. Hence it is not surprising that For instance, the synoptic Gospels reveal:
Concerning the biographical accounts of the two religious teachers Harden-Hickey (in Remsberg's work) notes: "One account must necessarily be a copy of the other, and since the Buddhist biographer, living long before the birth of Christ, could not have borrowed from the Christian one. . . ." The following are some of the parallels presented by this writer:
Artist
Carl Heinrich Bloch (1834-1890)
(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
The
Sermon on the Mount (Matthew, chapters 5–7) contains the ethical gist
of the New Testament but not necessarily that of organized Christian
religions of which there are about 33,000 distinct and separate ones. It is a
collection of religious teachings and the most important ethical sayings
of Jesus of Nazareth. It is probably the best part of the whole Bible and
is worth reading by believers and unbelievers alike. The sermon was addressed to disciples and a large
crowd of listeners to guide them in a life of righteousness based on a new
law of forgiveness and love even extended to enemies, and as opposed to
the Mosaic ("Old" Testament) law of retribution.
The sermon begins with the Beatitudes (blessed sayings) and also contains
the Lord's Prayer, the Golden Rule, the commandments to turn the other
cheek; to love your enemies; to judge not, that ye be not judged; and to ask
and it shall be given to you.
Moreover, Jesus warns:
Beware of false
prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly
they are ravening wolves (Mathew 7:15).
counsels:
Ye shall know them
by their fruits (Mathew 7:16).
and said:
I am the
light that is above them all. I am the all; the all came forth from me,
and the all attained to me. Cleave a (piece of) wood; I am there. Raise up
a stone, and you will find me there
(Saying 77 in the Gospel of Thomas but not
included in the New Testament).
Interpretation: It means that God is everywhere and you don't need to "connect" with Him through a priest or in a church. Wherever we seek, there we shall find. Christians believe that Jesus is the mediator of the "New" Covenant: "But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises" (Hebrews 8:6). His famous Sermon on the Mount representing Mount Zion is considered by many Christian theologians to be the antithesis of the proclamation of the "Old" Covenant by Moses from Mount Sinai. Others claim that Jesus affirms Moses proclamations but goes beyond it. Moreover, the ethical teachings of Jesus led in 1968 to "The Liberation Theology Movement," see below for text and Gospel quotations. The ethics of Jesus are almost verbatim the ethics of Buddhism. Many scholars regard Jesus' "Sermon on the Mount" as comparable in its tone of moral elevation and historical importance to Buddha's Sermon in the Deer Park near Benares (now Varanasi). Still another scholar, Martin A. Larson, in his The Story of Christianity (Village Press, 1977), points out: The ethical system of Buddhism is its most important feature; and especially to us, since it reappears substantially unaltered in the Gospel of Jesus. Larson then cites the following quotes from the scriptures of Buddhism:
Note: Christ ignored the Decalogue (10) of Moses and, like Buddha, presented a pentad which, with the exception of one commandment, is the same as that of Buddha. 4. The Wicked Teachings of Jesus As the gospel quotes below confirm, Jesus tells us that he has not come to save humanity but to deceive them with parables and proverbs, so that they may not understand and therefore not be saved. At this time, he will only tell his inner circle "the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven." He even cries out to God and thanks Him for keeping the truth away from the people! Furthermore, he informs us that "damnation of hell" awaits those who do not believe in him. Likewise, those who do not accept his rule over them, will be slain before him. Also, he has not come to bring peace, but war. Moreover, he demands that others should be converted by force, "compel them to come in, that my house may be filled." Finally, he promises that he will break up families by raising disagreement between all members of the family, including the mother in law, so that they will fight each other as enemies. Finally, he declares that those children who do not love him more than they love their parents, and parents who do not love him more than they love their children, are not worthy of him. These powerful demands by Jesus, together with his prophecy of an imminent end, explain why his apostles were willing to desert their wives and children to follow him and save their souls.
Three religious explanations, with one by the current pope Benedict XVI: 1.) In Matthew 13:10-17, Jesus explains the purpose of parables. It is not to expand the meaning, but to hide the meaning from the people whom He did not want to understand. Only with the Spirit of God can we really understand the parables, but He has to give us the understanding. Certain keys unlock parables, and if we do not have the keys, we will miss the meaning, and the interpretation will be wrong, off track (anonymous author). 2.) Christ did not speak in parables to make the meaning clear to just any reader! From the very beginning, God has supervised the writing of the Bible so that it cannot be understood without outside help. Even prophets and righteous men of old did not understand, nor did the multitudes who heard the parables of Christ. They are relegated to unbelief until a later time (i.e. the Millennium or Great White Throne Judgment), lest they rebel and must be destroyed (anonymous author). 3.) Pope Benedict XVI appears to confirm the above expressed explanations in his soon (July 2007) to be released Das Jesus-Buch des Papstes. He claims that since the New Testament texts are inspired by God, one cannot read and expect to understand without first having made the decision to believe. With other words, one must first believe in order to understand that the text is believable. Here, the Pope offers in different words the advice of Church Father Augustine (354-430 CE) who offered a perfect methodology for accepting that for which there is no evidence. He claimed: Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe.With reference to Mark 4:12 above, the Pope claims that these lines hint at the secret of the Cross and the mystery of God. In this connection, he points out that the parables convey the deepest of meaning that defies immediate understanding. Although immediate understanding is normally the purpose of a parable, the pope suggests that God was not able to do so. Do these writers have it right or are they just explaining the strange with the more strange? Or are they just obscuring the obvious by "muddying the water, to make it seem deep"? 5. The Theology of Jesus Jesus' theology in the three Synoptic Gospels derives its most important concepts from the theology of Zoroastrianism. The founder of this religion, Zoroaster, was a Persian prophet who at the age of about 30 had visions that took him spiritually up to heaven more than once. There, things were revealed to him by God, Ahura Mazda, the originator of all that is good, and who alone is praiseworthy. These divine revelations together with others from subsequent visits to heaven are collected in the main sacred text known as the "Avesta." This is a highly ethical religion from which the other world religions could learn, and in particular from its treatment of women. Jesus' soteriology, or doctrine of salvation, and his eschatology, or doctrine of last things were taught by Zoroaster hundreds of years before Jesus' appearance. Zoroaster taught that humans are responsible for their salvation because they are free to choose between right and wrong, and light and dark. Hence, they can be held accountable for their actions, utterances, and thoughts. In particular the following influenced Jesus' teachings:
Triumph of the Cross
over the now reduced to rubble pagan cultures and
religions.
Not only the Greek and Roman but also the cultures of Europe, the
Americas, and other colonized countries where destroyed.
Fresco Sala di Costantino,
Vatican Palace
By Tommaso Laureti
(1585).
(Photo source:
Wikimedia Commons)
9.
The Institutionalization and Imposition of
Christianity
Key Events 4th Century to the End of the Western
Roman Empire
Prior to
313 CE, Emperor Constantine I
(reign 306-337), now also
known as Saint Constantine or Constantine the Great, forms a favorable
view of Christianity possibly under the influence of his mother who was a
Christian convert.
313--In the edict of Milan,
Constantine puts an end to institutionalized discrimination, persecution,
and sometimes execution of Christians in the Roman Empire. However, as
noted above, the Roman Empire was very tolerant of all religions when
compared with the intolerance of of the Roman Catholic Church in the later
Holy Roman Empire. For instance, in the year
1349, in more than
350 towns in Germany all Jews were murdered, that is, mostly burned alive.
In this one year more Jews were killed than Christians in 200 years of
ancient Roman persecution of Christians (K. Deschner, p.42, in
Opus Diaboli, Reinbek, 1987).
ca.
314--In search for an empire-unifying state religion,
because their was strive between various religions and even between the
sects of Christianity, the emperor started to favor the Bishop of Rome and
his version of Christianity. Over the next few years, Constantine made the
firm decision that it would be necessary for the empire to have just one
religion, namely, Christianity as mainly selected, altered, and expounded
by the Bishop of Rome. Thus, the Bishop of Rome gained incalculably in
wealth and power. He literally moved from rags to riches. That is, he
emerged from the catacombs to settle in a palace, and he traded his rags
for the fancy garments of pagan priests. Moreover, at this point, church
offices, including the highest one, became of interest to leading Roman
families.
Soon after the Bishop of Rome becomes the emperor's conscience. He tells Constantine that all his sins would
be forgiven if he would convert to Christianity. Constantine, however, decides to do
his sinning first, like having his wife and son murdered, and is baptized only
on his death bed many years later on May 22, 337.
ca. 320--Buddhism's monastic system
is gradually implemented.
325
The Council
of Nicaea (in today's Turkey).
We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten of the Father [the only-begotten; that is, of the essence of the Father, God of God], Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father; by whom all things were made [both in heaven and on earth]; who for us men, and for our salvation, came down and was incarnate and was made man; he suffered, and the third day he rose again, ascended into heaven; from thence he shall come to judge the quick [alive] and the dead. And in the Holy Ghost. [But those who say: 'There was a time when he was not;' and 'He was not before he was made;' and 'He was made out of nothing,' or 'He is of another substance' or 'essence,' or 'The Son of God is created,' or 'changeable,' or 'alterable' — they are condemned by the holy catholic and apostolic Church.] 374--Justification for the Church's Autonomy by Ambrose (339-397) the bishop of Milan. Because Milan was the administrative capital of the Western empire, Ambrose was in the right place at the right time to influence the empire's politics. Before the Imperial Court he "showed a directness that combined the republican ideal of the prerogatives of a Roman senator with a sinister vein of demagoguery. Ambrose was able to initiate a model of church-state relations that would last to the end of the Middle Ages (to ca. 1,500). When in 384 the pagan members of the Roman Senate appealed for tolerance, he secured a rejection of their petition. Although he was neither a Christian nor did he have any theological training when offered the office of Bishop of Milan, he nevertheless accepted the position. Thereafter, and within a week, he was baptized, ordained, and duly installed as Milan's bishop. 380--Roman Catholic Christianity is now the state religion, and an edict (civil law) by Emperor Theodosius I. (reign 379-395) orders the persecution of heretics and threatens them with death. He is known for his vigorous suppression of paganism and competing versions of Christianity such as Arianism. Also, Theodosius established the creed of the Council of Nicaea (325) as the universal norm for the Christian faith. 381--The Council of Constantinople. Emperor Theodosius I (reign 379-395) summons the bishops of the Christian Church to repair the differences between the Eastern and Western Church on the basis of the Nicaean creed. From the beginning of his reign, and probably under the influence of Ambrose, Theodosius' religious policy reflected the conviction that the unity of the Empire unconditionally presupposed unity of faith. Moreover, to Theodosius it was clear that this faith could be only the by now traditional (orthodox) Nicaean creed. In addition, the council clarified the mysterious third person of the Trinity, the Holy Ghost. It defined this phenomenon as though equal with to the Father, 'proceeded from Him, whereas the Son was 'begotten' of Him. 384--Unification of the creed by Jerome (ca. 340-ca. 420) is made possible when he translates the Greek Bible into Latin and edits it. This version becomes commonly accepted in the West after ca. 550 when all its separate books are bound into a single volume. Moreover, it almost immediately facilitates wide agreement in the Greek East and the Latin West based on the canon of the twenty-seven books of the New Testament. Also, he held classes for noble Roman widows and virgins like the widow Paula and her virgin daughters. As the researcher Joseph McCabe reports: "He emphatically describes his group of pupils as a small oasis of virtue in a great dessert of vice. Priests and laity, men and women, he describes as sordid, greedy, unchaste, and utterly irreligious. He actually forbids his virtues young ladies ever to remain in a room with a Roman priest." However, his relentless criticism of the Roman clergy, lax monks, and hypocritical virgins resulted in allegations by the Roman clergy that he had improper relations with the widow Paula. In bitter indignation he left in the company of virgins led by Paula for the Holy Land where he lived until his death. 391 to 395--The alliance of throne and altar was complete when Christianity had become the state religion of Rome under the reign of the Emperor Theodosius I (379-395). Prohibited by law were all pagan rituals, including the Olympic Games, sacrifices, and visits to temples. Soon after, the reckoning of dates by Olympiads that had started in 776 BCE came to an end. Once Christianity was legalized, the Church took the same provinces for administration as the imperial government and called them dioceses. With the prestige, power, profit and privileges of a state religion came the obligation to support the state, that is, "interpret" the faith so that there would be no discord with the laws and actions of the state. 395--Justification for Bishop above King by Ambrose (339-397) bishop of Milan (see above). It is known as the concept of a Christian emperor as a dutiful son of the church “serving under orders from Christ,” and so subject to the advice and censures of his bishop. 396 to 430--Rationalization of the creed by Augustine (354-430) the Bishop of Hippo (an ancient city in N. Africa). He gives Christianity a philosophical justification and was probably the most significant Christian thinker after St. Paul. That is, he provided a most influential adaptation of a particular part of philosophy, the ancient Platonic tradition, with Christian ideas. Moreover, he developed doctrines of original sin, divine grace, divine sovereignty, the purgatory, and predestination. Augustine did all his sinning as a young man who then famously prayed "Grant me chastity and continence, but not yet." It was Neo-Platonism that guided Augustine. It is put forth as a philosophical system that originated in the 3rd century CE with Plotinus (ca. 205-ca. 270). It is based chiefly on Plato's (ca. 427-ca. 347 BCE) doctrine of the forms and the transmigration of souls. It is the idea that everything that exist is an imperfect copy of a perfect form that exists in a higher realm. Also, all existence consists of emanations from the One with whom the soul may be reunited. Augustine was perhaps the most important Christian thinker after Paul. It was the beginning of the end of Greek philosophy that Augustine had ushered in with his psychological rationalization. Within a few generations (ca. 550) the last school of philosophy in Athens would be closed, and all writings of the philosophers would be destroyed in Christendom; fortunately, however, they would be preserved in the Islamic world. As W. T. Stance points out in his A Critical History of Greek Philosophy: Plotinus's philosophy "is founded . . . upon the despair of reason." While "philosophy is upon reason. It is the effort to comprehend, to understand, to grasp the reality of things intellectually. Therefore, it cannot admit anything higher than reason. To exalt intuition, ecstasy, or rupture, above thought--this is the death of philosophy. . . . In Neo-Platonism, therefore, ancient philosophy commits suicide. This is the end. The place of philosophy is taken henceforth by religion." By ca. 400--The Papacy had acquired considerable property around Rome. It was called the Inheritance or Patrimony of St. Peter. As of 755, these large estates would be ruled as the temporal and spiritual domain of the Papacy known as the republic of St. Peter or the Papal States. 451--The Council of Chalcedon (modern Kadikoy, Turkey), set forth the Chalcedonian Creed, which describes the "full humanity and full divinity" of Jesus as the second person of the Holy Trinity. Moreover, the ability to accuse a bishop of wrong doing was limited. Also, it was decided that an accuser of a bishop shall be suspect before the bishop. 476--Official end of the Western Roman Empire when the last emperor, Romulus Augustus, is removed by the German warrior Odoacer who would then become the first barbarian king of Italy. ca. 476 to ca. 800--The Rapid and Complete Christianization of Europe.
We judge no man, and we cut off no man from communion for differing from us. None of us regards himself as the bishop of bishops, or seek by tyrannical threats to compel his colleagues to obey him (Big Blue Book No. B-27, Haldeman-Julius Co., n. d.).
ca. 500 to 751--The profitable alliance of altar and throne continues. This time the Church is closely associated with the Merovingian Dynasty which was the Frankish line of kings who reigned in Gaul (ancient France) during this period. The line was founded by King Clovis I (reign 481-511), and it filled the vacuum that was left in Europe with the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The clerics were of tremendous help in expanding the empire when they pacified the conquered and managed large landed estates. By the end of this time span, the monasteries had become powerful forces in terms of wealth and influence. The wealth was made possible from managing, that is, farming donated lands that came with cheap serf labor thus yielding substantial profits. The monks influence over the population of surrounding areas came from their apparently exemplary lives, their religious teachings, their coercive carrot (heaven) and stick (hell) approach, their show of relics and rituals that had a magical appeal and attracted pilgrims in droves from near and afar.The abbots who run these religious enterprises were thus rich and powerful magnates who served the king well by maintaining order, controlling the folks, and keeping them in awe of: God, His representative on earth, the pope, and His divinely ordained king. Moreover, from the beginning, the Merovingian kings had employed the higher clergy cooperatively with counts (earls) as royal agents. ca. 750--The Donation of Constantine, a powerful forgery. This counterfeit document is the best known and most important forgery of the Middle Ages. It was created by a cleric of the Lateran probably with the knowledge of Pope Stephen II (reign 752-757). It appears to record that the Roman emperor Constantine I (reign 312-337) bequeathed large territories as well as enormous spiritual and temporal powers on Pope Sylvester I (reign 314-335) and his successors. First, the document claims, Constantine converts to Christianity because Sylvester I had miraculously cured him of leprosy. The emperor, though preparing to leave town for his new capital of Constantinople, proclaims the importance of Rome to the church because it is the city of the apostles Peter and Paul. This is followed by the emperor granting the pope and his successors:
A portrait of
Charlemagne by Albrecht Dürer (1471-1528) that was painted several
centuries after his death. He wears the crown of the Holy Roman Empire and
unites, holds in his hands, both secular and ecclesiastical power. The
small globe with the cross on top is by itself also a symbol of royal
power. The
three lilies, top right, are the symbol of Frankish Royalty. The eagle,
top left, represents the military standard of the Roman Empire.
(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
Charlemagne unifies and Christianizes Europe:
(Photo source: Wikimedia
Commons)
898--The
Pornocracy or Rule of the Harlots--"In the years that followed
[Stephen VI], the power of electing to the popedom fell into the hands of
the Counts of Tusculum and their relatives, for instance, the intriguing and licentious Theodora, and her equally unprincipled
daughters, Theodora and Marozia. These women [though not prostitutes],
members of a patrician family [the Theophylacti and their relatives], by
their arts and beauty, obtained an unbounded influence over the
aristocratic tyrants of the city."
904--It is
widely believed that Marozia was the concubine of Pope Sergius III
(reign 904-911) and the mother of Pope John XI (reign 931-935) with pope
Sergius III allegedly the father. She was also accused of arranging the
murder of Pope John X (914-928) (who had originally been nominated for
office by one of the Theodora's) in order to secure the elevation of her
current favorite as Pope Leo VI (reign 928-928).]
955-- "One of
the Theodoras advanced a lover, and Marozia a son, to the popedom. The
grandson of the latter, Octavian, succeeding to her power, as well as to
the civil government of the city, elevated himself, on the death of the
then Pope, to the apostolic chair, at the age of eighteen, under
the title of John XII. (A.D. 956.)" [my emphases, see below]
955--A
place of intense fear for pilgrims--under John XII (reign
955-964) ". . . 'The Lateran palace [the pope's residence],' says Mr.
Bowden, 'was disgraced by becoming a receptacle for courtesans: and decent
females were terrified from pilgrimages to the threshold of the Apostles
by the reports which were spread abroad of the lawless impurity and
violence of their representative and successor.' . ."
962--the German king
Otto I and his wife Adelaide are crowned
as Holy Roman emperor and empress by the now 25 years old John XII.
However, John refused when Otto ordered to take an oath of obedience to
him. Subsequently, in 963, Otto ousted John for instigating an armed
conspiracy against him and for dishonorable conduct.
An account of the charges
leveled against John XII from the writings of the Church Fathers (Patrologia
Latina) include:
a. Benedict, cardinal deacon,
with other co-deacons and priests, said they knew that he had been paid
for
ordaining
bishops, specifically that he had
ordained a ten-year-old bishop in the city of
Todi...
b. They testified about his
adultery, which they did not see with
their own eyes, but nonetheless knew with certainty: he had
fornicated with the
widow of Rainier, with Stephana his
father's
concubine, with the widow Anna, and with
his own niece [incest], and he made the
sacred [Lateran] palace into a whorehouse.
c. They said that blinded his
confessor Benedict, and thereafter
Benedict had died; that he had that he had killed John, cardinal
subdeacon, after
castrating him;
d. All, clerics as well as
laymen, declared that he had
toasted to the devil with wine. They
said when playing at dice, he invoked Jupiter, Venus and other
demons. They even said he did not
celebrate
Matins [services between midnight and
dawn] and the
canonical hours nor did he make the sign
of the cross.
In the end, John was
replaced with Pope Leo VIII. But in February 964, after King Otto left, Leo was
deposed by a synod conducted by John. Soon after, the 27 year old died
suddenly. The manner of his death is not known, though it was rumored that
he was killed by a jealous husband whose wife had been found accepting his
sexual affections.
974--Robbing
St. Peter--"Boniface VII. (reign June-July 974), in the space of a few
weeks after his elevation, plundered the treasury and basilica of St.
Peter of all he could conveniently carry off, and fled to Constantinople."
984--The
return of the robber pope--In 984,
Boniface VII 92nd reign 984-985) was called back by the powerful
Crescentii family to replace Pope John XIV. Upon his return, he imprisoned
John and presumably murdered him.
1004--Papal
supremacy for sale--"John XVIII. (reign 1004-1009) expressed his readiness,
for a sum of money from the Emperor Basil, to recognize the right of the
Greek Patriarch to the title of ecumenical or universal bishop, and the
consequent degradation of his own see; and was only prevented by the
general indignation excited by the report of his intention."
1032--The boy
pope--"Benedict IX. [1st reign 1032-1044] was consecrated Pope, according to
some authorities, at the age of ten or twelve years, and became notorious
for adulteries and murders. At length he resolved on marrying his first
cousin; and, when her father would not assent except on the condition of
his resigning the popedom, he sold it for a large sum, and consecrated the
purchaser as his successor [Gregory VI, 1044-1046]."
". . . in the words of St.
Bruno, 'the world lay in wickedness, holiness had disappeared, justice had
perished, and truth had been buried; Simon* Magus lording it over the Church,
whose bishops and priests were given to luxury and fornication'."
*[Simon, according to the New
Testament account in Acts of the Apostles 8:9–24, after becoming a
Christian, offered to purchase from the Apostles Peter and John the
supernatural power of transmitting the Holy Spirit, thus giving rise to the
term
simony meaning the buying or
selling of sacred things or ecclesiastical office.]
1044--Gregory VI was now the reigning pope,
as we have seen above. "He
had lived free from the gross vices by which the clergy were too generally
disgraced. . . . As to his traffic in holy things, . . . . he really does
seem to have committed his act of simony with the very best intentions,
which he did in fact carry out, so far as his bargain was made good to him.
He had been known in the world as John Gratianus; and at the time of his
promotion was arch-priest of Rome. 'He was considered,' says Mr. Bowden, 'in
those bad times more than ordinarily religious; He is described as 'idiota
et miræ simplicitatis [ignorant and of extraordinary simplicity],' and, what
perhaps is included in this account of him, he was unlettered. . . . and
Gregory, however, after a time, seemed to preponderate over his antagonists
[the boy pope had returned to reclaim the Papacy]; he maintained a body of
troops, and with these he suppressed the suburban robbers who molested the
pilgrims. Expelling them from the sacred limits of St. Peter's, he carried
his arms further, till he had cleared the neighboring towns and roads of
these marauders.
1045--With the return
of the boy pope we have now three popes--"He
[Gregory VI] could not be quite said to have come into actual possession of
his purchase; for Benedict, his predecessor, who sold it to him, being
disappointed in his intended bride, returned to Rome after an absence of
three months [in 1045], and resumed his pontifical station, while the party
of his intended father-in-law had had sufficient influence to create a Pope
of their own, John, Bishop of Sabina, who paid a high price for his
elevation, and took the title of Sylvester III. And thus there were three
self-styled Popes at once in the Holy City, Benedict performing his sacred
functions at the Lateran, Gregory at St. Peter's, and Sylvester at Santa
Maria Maggiore."
1046--The boy pope's
3rd reign--Henry III, emperor of Germany, was disgusted with the
multiple-pope situation and invoked the Council of Sutri in December of
1046. However none of the three popes was favored. 1. Sylvester was declared
a false claimant and imprisoned. 2. Benedict was deposed, and 3. Gregory was
charged with simony, deprived of the papacy, and replaced by the Saxon
bishop Suidger of Bamberg as
Clement II. After Clement's death in 1047,
Benedict reappeared in Rome and installed himself once more. He was finally
disposed in 1048 and the last of the popes from the powerful Theophylacti
family.
1073--Pope Gregory VII (reign
1073-85) reforms and re-invents the Church. Like other popes before
and after him, he was persuaded that:
1309 to 1377--The popes took up residence in Avignon, France primarily because of the current political turmoil at that time in Rome. In 1348, Avignon became direct papal property. The Avignon papacy was overwhelmingly French in complexion, that is, all seven of the popes during the period were French, as were 111 of the 134 cardinals created. 1378 to 1417--When there were two, and later three, rival popes during the Great Western Schism. It began with Urban VI (reign 1378-1379) in Rome and Clement VII (reign 1378-1394) in Avignon. Hence, there were: 1. two Sacred College of Cardinals; 2. two expensive Papal courts to maintain; 3. two sets of Papal legates swarming over Europe; 4. two appointees for every vacant church job; and 5. two levies of ecclesiastical taxes with the creation of many new schemes to raise money for the two sets of expenses.1409--A third pope emerged when the Council of Pisa attempted with a formal trial to solve the 30-year Schism. The two rival popes then in office, Roman Pope Gregory XII and Avignon Pope Benedict XIII, were removed from office as "notorious schismatics, notorious heretics, errant from the faith and guilty of perjury and violated oath. A new pope was elected, John XXIII, but both the Roman and the Avignon pope refused to recognize the right of the Council to dethrone them. Thus, instead of healing the split, there were now three popes. The three-pope situation lasted for five years. 1455--Pope Nicholas (reign 1447-55): "Strengthens the faith of the weak by that which it sees." His plans were to embellish the city with new monuments worthy of the capital of the Christian world. But the works on which he especially set his heart were the rebuilding of the Vatican, the Borgo district, and St Peter's Basilica where the reborn glories of the papacy were to be focused. He had ancient monuments such as the Colosseum looted for building materials. Under his drive, Rome became a centre for goldsmiths, silversmiths, tapestry makers, and other artisans and artists such as the great Florentine painter Fra Angelico (1387–1455). He justified these endeavors as follows: To create solid and stable conviction there must be something that appeals to the eye. A faith sustained only by doctrine will never be anything but feeble and vacillating. . . If the authority of the Holy See were visibly displayed in majestic buildings. . . all the world would accept and revere it. Noble edifices combining taste and beauty with imposing proportions would immensely exalt the chair of St. Peter. 1510--Ends the disturbing papal election process when the Colonna and the Orsini families, and their baron peers sign an agreement to live in peace, that is, avoid confrontations in connection with the conclaves. This compromise was viewed as a great sacrifice, a giving up of vital influence by the families involved because:"The ancient Roman nobility's survival had largely depended all along on the wealth and influence derived from close participation in the spiritual and temporal government of the papacy. It was their close family ties with the reigning popes to which they owed their considerable fortunes." After 1510, it was not necessary for the emperors of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation to intervene in the papal election process. ca. 1550--Women banned from church choirs are replaced by castrati. The ban was justified by Paul's letter to the Corinthians and other writings in the Bible: Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church (I Corinthians 14:34-35) So, the churches replaced women with castrated male singers who had a soprano, mezzo-soprano, or alto voice. This practice lasted to the end of 19th century, and with the Church's last castrato, Alessandro Moreschi, dying in 1922. Most were created by castrating boys before they reached puberty. This prevented their vocal cords from lengthening and their voice from deepening. With the lung capacity and muscular strength of an adult male and the vocal range of a prepubescent boy. Pope Sixtus V (reign 1585-1590) issued a papal Bull in 1589 which approved the recruitment of castrati for the choir of St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. Castrati were later widely employed by opera companies. One source estimates that, during the 17th and 18th centuries, three to five thousand boys per year in Italy were castrated. The amputation was performed by butchers and barbers, and the death rate of the boys varied from 10-80% depending on the skills of the "physician." Castration was forbidden much earlier under canon law because too many priests and bishops had performed self-castration and plucked out their right eye to avoid sexual sin or temptation according to the Bible: For their are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it (Mathew 19:12) But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh at a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell (Mathew5:28-29). However, the church created a market for castrati by hiring them for its church choirs. The Sistine Chapel continued to employ castrati until 1903. 1633--Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) Condemned for Asserting that the Earth MovesWe by the grace of God, cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, Inquisitors General, by the Holy Apostolic see specially deputed, against heretical depravity throughout the whole Christian Republic. Whereas you, Galileo, . . . , aged seventy years, were in the year 1615 denounced to this Holy Office for holding as true the false doctrine . . . .following the hypothesis of Copernicus, which are contrary to the true sense and authority of Holy Scripture: . . . . [namely] The proposition that the sun is the centre of the world and does not move from its place is absurd and false philosophically and formally heretical, because it is expressly contrary to the Holy Scripture. The proposition that the earth is not the centre of the world and immovable, but that it moves, and also with a diurnal [daily] motion, is equally absurd and false philosophically, and theologically considered, at least erroneous in faith. . . . And in order that this your grave and pernicious error and transgression may not remain altogether unpunished, and that you may be more cautious for the future, and an example to others, that they may abstain from similar delinquencies—we ordain that the book of the “Dialogues of Galileo Galilei” be prohibited by public edict. We condemn you to the formal prison of this Holy Office during our pleasure, and by way of salutary penance, we enjoin that for three years to come, you repeat once a week the seven penitential Psalms. Reserving to ourselves full liberty to moderate, commute, or take off, in whole or in part, the aforesaid penalties and penance. And so we say, pronounce, sentence, declare, ordain, condemn and reserve, in this and any other better way and form which we can and may lawfully employ. Galileo was required to recant his heliocentric ideas, and the idea that the Sun is stationary was condemned as "formally heretical." He would spent the rest of his life under house arrest. 1645--By the end of the Catholic Counter Reformation, extreme nepotism such as the appointment of popes by families was no longer possible. The popes had to be content with granting their friends and relatives:
Their breath stinks for the gold and silver of the heathen; since no people under the sun always have been, still are, and always will remain more avaricious than they, as can be noticed in their cursed usury. Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement and enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew...Do not their Talmud and rabbis write that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob - as they do with their money lending - from a heathen, is a divine service... "Now what are we going to do with these rejected, condemned Jewish people?" ...to set fire to their synagogues or schools and to bury and cover with dirt whatever will not burn... I advise that their houses be razed and destroyed... I advise that all their prayer books... in which such idolatry, lies, cursing, and blasphemy are taught, be taken from them... that their rabbis be forbidden to teach henceforth on pain of loss of life and limb... that safe-conduct on the highways be abolished completely for the Jews... that all their treasure of silver and gold be taken from them... But if the authorities are reluctant to use force and restrain the Jews' devilish wantonness, the latter should, as we said, be expelled from their country and be told to return to ... Jerusalem where they may lie, curse, blaspheme, defame, murder, steal, rob, practice usury, mock, and indulge in all those infamous abominations which they practice among us, and leave ... our Lord the Messiah, our faith, and our church undefiled and uncontaminated with their devilish tyranny and malice (my emphases). 1558--Pope Pius V orders the expulsion of the Jews from the Papal States, though for commercial reasons they were allowed to remain under degrading conditions in Rome and Ancona, a seaport on the Adriatic Sea. (more about Pius below). 1648--Chmielnitzki massacres: In Poland about 200,000 Jews were slain. 1938 to 1945--The Holocaust started on Nov. 9, 1938 with the Kristallnacht pogrom and led to the the systematic state-sponsored killing of six million Jewish men, women and children in Nazi extermination camps. In a speech Hitler asserted that he was doings God's work when ridding the world of Jews. Moreover, prisoners of war, political dissidents, trade unionists, Social Democrats, Gypsies (who were pure Arians), and millions of others "undesirables" were exterminated by Nazi Germany and its collaborators during World War II. Hans Küng, a leading Catholic theologian, stated that "Nazi anti-Judaism was the work of godless, anti-Christian criminals. But it would not have been possible without the almost two thousand years' pre-history of 'Christian' anti-Judaism." However, Küng does not explain the pope's silence, his sin of omission, for not speaking out against these atrocities of which he was aware. Moreover, the pope brought the Nazis to power and actively supported them to the end and even after the end with the Vatican Nazi-war-criminal escape line. How is he any better than the godless, anti-Christian criminals Küng is blaming? 1942 to 1943--Catholic extermination camps in Croatia. There existed numerous such facilities that were operated by the Catholic Ustasha under their dictator Ante Paveliç. He was a practicing Catholic and regular visitor to the then pope. There were even concentration camps exclusively for children! In these camps, the most notorious was Jasenovac, headed by a Franciscan friar - orthodox-Christian Serbians and a substantial number of Jews, Serbs, and Gypsies were murdered. Unlike the Nazis, the Catholic Ustasha burned their victims alive in kilns, while the Nazis were at least "decent" enough to have their victims gassed first. But most of the victims, estimated between 300,000 and 600,000, were simply stabbed, slain or shot to death. Many of the killers were Franciscan friars. The atrocities were appalling enough to induce bystanders of the Nazi "Sicherheitsdient der SS", watching, to complain about them to Hitler who did nothing. Also, the pope knew about these events and did nothing to prevent them. Pope Pius had cordial relations with the fascist Croat regime of Ante Pavelic, an ally of Hitler and Mussolini, despite his knowledge that it had massacred Orthodox Serbs, Gypsies, and Jews by the hundreds of thousands. His informed complicity was documented by Carlo Falconi, an Italian journalist and former priest who had had access to the Vatican archives.15. The Holy Wars Against Moslems, Pagans, and Other Christians a. Holy Wars Against Moslems and Jews 1095 to 1250--The First thru Seventh "Holy Land" Crusades 1212--The Children's Crusade 11th to end of 15th century--The Re-conquest of Spain b. Holy Wars Against Pagans 1211 to 1283--The Baltic or Northern Crusades c. Holy Wars Against Other Christians 1209 to 1229--The Albigensian Crusade 1419 to 1436--The Hussite Crusade 1572--The Massacre of Saint Bartholomew's Day Introduction The holy wars or crusades were against groups seen as enemies to the Roman Catholic version of Christendom. This included almost everyone outside the Church who was determined to impose its faith on the rest of the world. They were authorized by the pope either by sanctioning them explicitly or implicitly by his passive consent to the actions, or by quiet submission to a crusading ruler, for instance, Charlemagne's (reign 768-814). Crusaders, in the case of kings, were promised the crown of the Holy Roman Empire. All others were told to "undertake this journey for the remission of your sins, with the assurance of the imperishable glory of the kingdom of heaven" (Pope Urban II in 1095). This speech initiated a cruel and deadly chain of events that would last for several hundred years. The remission of sins encouraged massacres, rape, plunder, desecration of places sacred to others, mindless destruction of property, and other wicked action without guilt. Moreover, there was the material gain of conquered lands and booty. Also, two monastic, military orders were formed in the 12th century, the Knights Templar and the Knights Hospitaller. They were militarily trained to protect and help pilgrims to the Holy Land, but they also took vows of chastity and poverty. However, both orders, and in particular the Templars did monetarily very well. Later on, the Templars took on greater military duties and became a model and inspiration for other military orders. Their growing influence and wealth created envy from rival orders. Eventually, a king of France would forcefully dissolve them in the 14th century. a. Holy Wars Against Moslems and Jews 1095 to 1250--The First thru Seventh "Holy Land" Crusades: 1095 to 1099--The mass slaughters by the First Crusade 1. On their way to the Holy Land about 12,000 Jews were slaughtered mainly in Germany. but also in Metz/France, Prag/Czech). [EJ] 2. In 1098, the Crusaders take Edessa and then Antioch. Ibn al Athir comments, "For three days they put people o the sword, killing more than a hundred thousand people and taking many prisoners." And Radulph of Caen relates, "In Maarra our troops boiled pagan adults in cooking pots; they impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled." 3. In 1099, Jerusalem falls and the whole population is put to the sword. The crusaders spent a week to massacre Muslims and Jews. About seventy thousand Muslims were killed in the Al-Aqsa Mosque, Jews gathered in their synagogue were burned alive, and monuments of saints, other mosques, and the tomb of Abraham was destroyed. The cleric Raymond of Aguilers, who was an eyewitness and chronicler, wrote: "In the temple of Solomon, one rode in blood up to the knees and even to the horses' bridles, by the just and marvelous judgment of God." 1198 to 1204--The sacking of Constantinople by the Fourth Crusade 1. In 1202, some 30,000 Crusaders arrived in Venice to be shipped across the Mediterranean Sea. However, they did not have the funds to pay the Venetians as promised for the transport. The leader of Venice, then, offered a way out. If the Crusaders would capture the rival Christian port city Zadaron on the Adriatic Sea (now in Croatia), he would suspend the debt until it could be paid in captured booty. In November of 1202, the Crusaders seized the city for the Venetians. 2. While in Zadar, Alexius, the Byzantine prince asked the Crusaders to sail to Constantinople, topple the emperor of the Greek Orthodox Christian Eastern empire, and install him as the new emperor. For this deed they were offered an enormous amount of money, the promise that the Eastern church would be in submission to the pope, and that a large army would join them on their way to the Holy Land. They captured Constantinople in the second halve of 1203 and installed Alexius as emperor. 3. Alexius, however, was unable to pay, and was himself toppled late in January 1204. Deprived of their reward, the enraged Crusaders declared war on the city, which fell on April 12, 1204 and was promptly ravaged by the army of the Fourth Crusade. As one report notes: What followed was one of the most profitable and disgraceful sacks of a city in history. Despite their oaths and the threat of excommunication, the Crusaders ruthlessly and systematically violated the city's holy sanctuaries, destroying, defiling, or stealing all they could lay hands on. Many also broke their vows to respect the women of Constantinople and assaulted them (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2008) The conquests of the Fourth Crusade would bring the merchants of Venice wealth thru new domains and maritime rights that assured its domination of the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Constantinople, however, would never be the same for the remainder of its Christian history. It would stay poverty-stricken, dilapidated, and largely uninhabited. The 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th, and 7th Crusades. Although many thousands were killed on both sides, all of these Crusades were failures as far a their stated objectives are concerned. 1212--The Children's Crusade The failure to re-conquer Jerusalem by the professional crusaders frustrated Europe's Christians who had strong feelings of piety and righteousness for this action. The religious fervor to do something ran high among the people and resulted sometimes in bizarre actions among which the Children's Crusade is probably the most grotesque. During the summer of 1212 two large groups formed with the objective to conquer the Holy Land by love rather than by violence. The movement started when a young French shepherd named Stephen had a vision in which Jesus ordered him to raise an army to help the Holy Land. It is estimated that he attracted about 30,000 followers willing to journey to the Holy Land. It was reported that they reached Marseille, "where they fell victim to disreputable merchants who shipped them to the slave markets in North Africa. A second group of about 20,000 children formed in the Rhineland under the leadership of a 10-year-old boy named Nicholas from Cologne. Those who reached Genoa were denied passage across the Mediterranean Sea. Some traveled to Rome where the Pope Innocent III released them from their crusade vows. It was reported that many of these children, like the first group, were sold in the East as slaves. Other reports note that both groups simply disappeared without a trace. Being sold into slavery in distant countries would make the disappearance and the earlier accounts plausible. 11th century to 1492--The Reconquest of Spain and Portugal The Muslims (Moors), had occupied most of the Iberian Peninsula in the early 8th century. It was for the most part an Islamic Emirate or Caliphate where for the next 300 years Muslims, Christians, and Jews lived harmoniously together. However, in the 11th century, Moorish unity broke down and the Christian kingdoms of northern Spain developed an aggressive, anti-Muslim, crusading spirit. The Christian rulers proclaimed that they were re-conquering Christian territory lost to Muslim invaders. This ensured that Christian reinforcements would continue to arrive from other Christian realms, especially because the Papacy in Rome continued to support such efforts. A series of battles followed, and by the mid-13th century most of the peninsula had been subjected to Christian rule. Within a few years, and open, multi-ethnic and tolerant society was turned into a brutal, intolerant, anti-Semitic and anti-Islamic society. Subsequent Spanish emphasis on religious uniformity enforced with the help of the Inquisition led to forced conversions and finally the expulsion of people of Moorish and Jewish descent. b. Holy Wars Against Pagans 1211 to 1283--The Baltic and Northern Crusades The Baltic or Northern Crusades were crusades carried out by the Catholic kings of Denmark and Sweden, the German Teutonic military order, and other supporters against the pagans of Northern Europe around the southern and eastern shores of the Baltic Sea. The objective was Christianizing, and the incentive were prospective territory and booty. For instance, and particularly successful were the Teutonic Knights (Deutscher Orden). This was a German monastic, military order modeled on the order of the Knights Hospitaller towards the end of the 12th century. 1211 to 1225 the Teutonic Knights battle the pagans of Transylvania. They subdued the population and enduringly Christianized them. Their territorial gains were short lived, for they were soon expelled by the king of Hungary. 1233 to 1283 the conquest of Prussia by the Teutonic Knights. Having learned from their failure to hold on to conquered territory, the grand master of the order, Hermann von Salza, set out to take new lands that would, however, be secure afterwards. Before going to war, he received the following assurances:
1. The word of God shall be preached and made known in the kingdom of Bohemia freely and in an orderly manner by the priests of the Lord. 2. The sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist shall be freely administered in the two kinds, that is bread and wine, to all the faithful in Christ who are not precluded by mortal sin - according to the word and disposition of Our Saviour. 3. The secular power over riches and worldly goods which the clergy possesses in contradiction to Christ’s precept, to the prejudice of its office and to the detriment of the secular arm, shall be taken and withdrawn from it, and the clergy itself shall be brought back to the evangelical rule and an apostolic life such as that which Christ and his apostles led. 4. All mortal sins, and in particular all public and other disorders, which are contrary to God’s law shall in every rank of life be duly and judiciously prohibited and destroyed by those whose office it is. All this, and in particular resistance to the indulgences angered the King of Bohemia and the Roman church who felt that its authority was challenged. The King called on his brother, the Emperor, for help, and he in turn compelled Antipope John XXIII to invoke a council. The Council of Constance (1414-1418) invited Hus to attend and explain his views. He accepted since King Sigismund had guaranteed him safe conduct to and from the proceedings, and regardless of the council's decision concerning his proposed reform. Soon after his arrival in November of 1414, Hus was arrested and jailed with the Emperor's implicit consent. The majority of the council decided that he was a dangerous heretic and should be treated as such. On July 6, 1415, he was sentenced to death and promptly burned at the stake. This execution greatly incensed the people of Bohemia and many of their knights and nobles who all wanted church reform. From there on, the Hussite movement demanded an immediate and radical change - it had become revolutionary. The First Hussite Crusade--Pope Martin V issued a bull in March 1420 which ordered a crusade "for the destruction of the Wycliffites [out of which the Hussites had emerged], Hussites and all other heretics in Bohemia. As noted above, King Sigismund and German princes led the troops who consisted largely of mercenaries that were attracted by the hope for plunder. In the end, the strongly motivated Hussites soundly defeated their adversaries and shortly thereafter controlled most of Bohemia. The Second Hussite Crusade--A large German contingent of crusaders entered Bohemia in 1421. They attempted to storm the city of Zatec but were repelled. After the news arrived that Hussite troops were on their way, they decided on a strategic retreat, meaning, they fled. At the end of this year, the King Sigismund arrived and captured the town of Kutná Hora. Soon after, however, at the battle of Nemecky Brod on January 6, 1422, he was soundly defeated. The Third Hussite Crusade--After the loss of the first two crusades, one would think that the papacy would take this as a sign from God to stop warring. But the Pope probably knew that "God is always on the side of the strongest battalions" (Napoleon). So, there was another attempt in 1423 that fizzled soon and ended in complete failure. There were many smaller wars until a peace agreement was signed on July 5, 1436 by now Emperor Sigismund, the Hussite delegates, and representatives of the Roman Catholic Church. 1572--The Massacre of Saint Bartholomew's Day In France, on August 24 and 25 of that year, about 70,000 French Protestants, known as Huguenots, were killed by Catholic nobles and other citizens according to the contemporary Huguenot Duke de Sully, who himself barely escaped death. Modern sources put the number at 3,000 in Paris alone. Until the 17th century, 200,000 Huguenots flee to other countries. The hatred that sparked this atrocity was fostered by the Counter-Reformation directed at the time by Pope Pius V (reign 1566-1572). This Dominican had excelled as inquisitor of the Inquisition in discovering, examining, and punishing heretics and was made Grand Inquisitor of the Roman Church (1558). Pius, who had died three month before the massacre, was later elevated to sainthood for his moral perfection and the miracles he had worked during his lifetime. The massacre was celebrated by Pope Gregory XIII (1572-1585) with a Te Deum, a hymn of praise to God. Moreover, he had a medal struck to commemorate the event.Subsequently, the Huguenots abandoned the doctrine of obedience to the royal authority. They adopted the view that rebellion and tyrannicide, the killing of tyrants, were justifiable under certain circumstances. 16. The Inquisition a. Theological and Biblical "Justification" for the Inquisition b. The Inquisition from 380 to 1834 c. The Inquisition's Torture Techniques Introduction Helen Ellerbe had it right when she summarized: Both the inquisition and . . . slavery relied upon the same religious justification. In keeping with the orthodox Christian belief in a singular and fearful God who rules at the pinnacle of hierarchy, power resided solely with authority, not with the individual. Obedience and submission were valued far more than freedom and self-determination. The Inquisition played out the darkest consequences of such a belief system as it imprisoned and killed the spirits of countless people -- and not simply for a brief moment of time. The inquisition spanned centuries and was still active in some places as late as 1834 [my emphases].
Catholic
clerics presiding over the torture of a man suspected to be a heretic
before his subsequent
execution during the
Spanish Inquisition. Circa 1700 AD.
According to
Herrera Puga the authorities: "...placed
no limits on the means; in this way they used the
rack, the
lash,
fire, etc. In some cases...they applied
padlocked irons to the flesh which even led to the
amputation of a
hand..."
(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
a. Biblical and
Theological Justification for the Inquisition
Biblical
justification
The agents of the
Inquisition interpreted these two New Testament passages literally:
If a man abide not in me
[Jesus of Nazareth],
he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and
cast [them] into the fire, and they are burned (John
15:6).
Of whom is Hymenaeus and
Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to
blaspheme (1 Timothy 1:20).
Theological justification
Christianity pleads for
religious tolerance in the first three centuries. During this period,
however, the Church was a powerless small minority who did not have the
backing of the state. The Latin Church Fathers advocated friendly
persuasion rather than force towards those who
erred in matters of
faith. Moreover, they urged for religious
freedom of the individual.
ca. 200--Tertullian (ca. 157-220) was an early, important Christian theologian who wrote:
ca. 300--Lactantius (240-320) was an early Christian apologist and one of the most reprinted Church Fathers. He points out:
And to this day, the Roman Catholic Church insists that she always adhered to the principle that religion could not be forced on others when dealing with the unbaptized. Also, the church claims that "when comparing the Mosaic Law and the Christian religion, they taught that the latter was content with a spiritual punishment of heretics (i.e. with excommunication), while Judaism necessarily proceeded against its dissidents with torture and death." ca. 340--Religious tolerance ends when Christianity becomes the state's religion. After Constantine died in 337, his successors "soon began to see in themselves Divinely appointed 'bishops of the exterior', i.e. masters of the temporal and material conditions of the Church. At the same time they retained the traditional authority of 'Pontifex Maximus' . . . . " (Catholic Encyclopedia), that is, they claimed the authority of head priest of the Roman state religion that was now the Roman Church's version of Christianity. And indeed, until the early modern period, it is the emperors that convene and preside over church councils and enforce its decrees. Moreover, it is the emperors who furnish the military power to convert pagans and go after those the state church perceives as a threat, e.g., Jews, Moslems, and diverging Christian religions, that is, heretics. Charlemagne (above) is a good example.
ca. 380--St. Optatus defends the state's right to kill heretics. He writes against Donatism, a Christian sect that flourished in the 4th cent. and was noted for its rigorous views on morality and sanctity, esp. that of the clergy. In support of civil authority he contends:
"This was the first time that a Catholic bishop championed a decisive cooperation of the State in religious questions, and its right to inflict death on heretics. For the first time, also, the Old Testament was appealed to, though such appeals had been previously rejected by Christian teachers" (Catholic Encyclopedia).
ca. 1250-- Thomas Aquinas demands the death penalty for heretics. He insists that: The acceptance of the faith is voluntary; however, once accepted, it becomes necessary to keep it. (Accipere fidem est voluntaris, sed tenere fidem iam acceptam est necessitatis.) b. The Inquisition from 380 to 1834 Soon after the Western Roman Empire officially ended in 476, the Roman Church formed an alliance with whoever ruler would support her. The early Church Father Ambrose (339-397) already used "Roman" and Christian" almost synonymously. With future Christian emperors to protect and promote the interests of the church, and the church taking on the responsibility to maintain social order thru preaching obedience to the emperors and administrating parts of the empire, most Christians thought of church and empire as one and the same. On account of the close alliance or merger of mutually supporting interests between church and state, heretics were thought of as enemies of society. Their beliefs could endanger the "common good," which was perceived as a natural order where everybody had a divinely ordained place. It just so happened that the nobility's and the upper clergy's place was on the very top. Hence, with the appearance of large scale heresies in the 11th and 12th century, the Inquisition was instituted in which church and state would cooperate, share the work, and exterminate the problem. The working methodology of the Inquisition:
385--Priscillian (ca. 340-385) was the first heretic put to death. He was an early Christian bishop who founded Priscillianism, an unorthodox rigorous ascetic. sect that persisted into the 6th century. He was ordered to defend himself in Trier (now in Germany) where he was found guilty of sorcery and immorality and thus executed. 1231--The Inquisition becomes a permanent and separate tribunal under Pope Gregory IX (reign 1227-1241). Also, the papal order demands that heretics suffer death by fire. 1252--The use of torture is authorized by Pope Innocent IV (1243-1254) to obtain confessions and the names of other heretics. Moreover, he declared "that anyone who attempted to construe a personal view of god which conflicted with church dogma must be burned without pity." 1478--The Spanish Inquisition authorized by Pope Sixtus IV, and who appointed the Dominican Tomás de Torquemada as Inquisitor General. He introduced the auto-da-fé, the public ceremony that was an elaborate celebration at which sentences were announced and mass execution by burning at the stake were carried out. This grand display of cruelty accomplished one primary objective, namely, to plant fear and terror in the minds of the masses. 1490--People "... were deprived of the liberty to hear and talk freely," complains Juan de Mariana, "since in all cities, towns, and villages, there were persons [spies] placed to give information of what went on. this was considered by some the most wretched slavery and equal to death." 1542--The Roman Inquisition to combat Protestantism is established by Pope Paul III (1534-1549) as part of the Catholic Counter-Reformation. Historians report that it avoided the worst excesses of the earlier inquisitions. However, Pope Pius V (reign 1566-1572), a Dominican and former Grand Inquisitor, affirmed that matters of faith took precedence over all other functions and made it clear that his priority would be to see that heresy, false doctrine, and error were suppressed. He actively participated in the affairs of the Inquisition.f1570--The Inquisition reached the Americas soon after Columbus discovered it for the Europeans in 1492. By 1570 there were independent tribunals in Peru and Mexico. Native Americans who would not convert were treated like heretics and burned. 1600--Giordano Bruno (ca. 1548-1600) Dominican monk, near death after almost eight years of incarceration, was burned at the stake, on the Campo dei Fiori (Rome) on 2/17/1600, for his scientific and religious views that were considered heretical. 1834--After 356 years of terror the Spanish Inquisition is finally abolished. 1908--The Inquisition is renamed the Holy Office by Pope Pius X. 1917--Torture is abolished by the Roman Church in the new Code of Canon Law. 1965--Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is presently the name of the former Inquisition. Like the Inquisition, it is charged with maintaining the purity of the faith, however, by modern means such as removing their professors of theology from teaching positions if the findings of their research does not coincide with church doctrine. 1966--Possession and reading of the Bible is no longer banned. The Bible was listed on the Index of Forbidden Books by the Roman Catholic Church. These were publications considered perilous to the faith, morals, and theology. Moreover, they could be dangerous to the power of the Church and its hierarchy. Catholics who violated the ban could be punished with excommunication. The Index of Forbidden Books was finally abolished in 1966 by Pope Paul VI (reign 1963-1978). c. The Inquisition's Torture Techniques Many styles of torture had been invented during the Inquisition so as to inflict the most horrific pain on the victims without killing them. The worst of these techniques were turned upon those accused of witchcraft. With Pope Innocent VIII issuance of a papal bull against witches in 1484, the torture of people accused of being a witch reached fanatical proportions. The worst tortures of the inquisition occurred in Germany and France. Also, there was no limit to the types and cruelty of the tortures. The Inquisition meant anything was allowed:
17. The Witchcraft Trials (1330-1700) Innocent women, men, and children convicted and burned alive for crimes, sex with male and female devils, that were in fact not possible. Although the most acute judges of the witches and even the witches themselves, were convinced of the guilt of witchery, the guilt nevertheless was non-existent. It is thus with all guilt. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) a.) Biblical, theological, and papal justifications for witch hunts b.) The five common witchcraft offences c.) The condemned Johannes Junius explains his confession d.) The trial and execution of nine year old Christine Teipel Introduction The seeking out, trial, and execution of the innocent as witches intensified in the mid 1400s when it became a priority for the Inquisition. Over almost three centuries, it is estimated that about 100,000 to 1 million innocent women, men, and children were tortured and burned at the stake if they survived the torment to extract a confession. Those who confessed and repented were often shown "mercy" and strangled to death before being burned. However, those who would not confess even under torture were accused of being aided by the devil. On the way to the stake or gallows victims were flogged, burned, branded and had their hands and tongues hacked off. During torture a clerk recorded what was said and sometimes what was not said. The torturers were paid out of seized funds belonging to the victim. If the victim had no money then the relatives were made to pay. During this time nobody not even animals were safe. Pigs, bulls, cows, birds, mice, and locusts were properly tried and condemned to hang, to be burned at the stake, or to be banished. A rooster was found guilty for laying an egg and burned at the stake. Some birds were found guilty of disturbing a Holy Mass and therefore banished. The condemned were for the most part from among the poor and defenseless. It was only after some pillars of the community, the prosperous and professionals, were accused that community leaders began to have a personal interest in the validity of witch trials. By the end of the 17th century and the beginning of the Age of Reason, skepticism resulted in legislation and theologies that dismissed the concept of witchcraft in most European countries. Moreover, by the 17th century the Catholic church began to loose power and with it the Inquisition's major support structure collapsed. The last execution was in Switzerland in 1782. Britain prosecuted under the Witchcraft Act until the late 1940s, but it was repealed in 1951.
Execution of alleged witches "in one fire."
Jacob Truchsess
von der Scheer at Waldsee
(?) had 21 witches executed on
June 10, 1587. The next
day, another 8 witches were burned.
(Photo source: Wikimedia
Commons)
a.) Biblical, theological,
and papal justifications for witch hunts
Biblical
Most New Testament
translators use the terms sorcerer and sorcery rather than witch and
witchcraft.
There are several
references in the Christian Bible:
Acts 8:9 and 13:6,
Galatians 5:20,
Revelation 21:8 and 22:15.
However,
the Hebrew Bible ("Old"
Testament) strongly condemns witchcraft:
Exodus 22:18--"Thou
shalt not suffer a witch to live."
Leviticus 20:27--"A
man also or woman that has a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard
[a person who practices magic or sorcery], shall surely put to death: they
shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be
upon them."
Leviticus 19:26--"Ye
shall not eat anything with the blood: neither shall ye use enchantment
[cast a spell over, as by magic; bewitch], nor observe times."
Deuteronomy
18:10-12--"There shall not be found among you any one
that maketh his son or his daughter to
pass through the fire, or that
useth divination, or an observer
of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,
Or a charmer [a person
casting spells or an amulet, that is, a thing having magical powers], or a
consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer
[communication with the spirits of deceased persons]
For all that do these
things are an abomination unto the
Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them
out from before thee."
Theological
ca. 906--Canon law,
in Canon Episcopi, declared that belief in the existence of witchcraft
was heresy. They supported their assertion with the Church father
Augustine of Hippo (354-430) declaration that a heretic is one who either
devises or follows false and new opinions for the sake of some temporal
profit."
In 1486 the
witch-hunt inquisitors received a powerful instrument when the Dominican
monk Heinrich Krämer published Malleus maleficarum ("The Witches'
Hammer"). It was an instruction manual and collection of prejudices against
women that formed the basis for systematically finding and justifying
prosecutable offences.
Krämer accuses women of having insatiable sexual appetites, thus, their
intimacy with male devils, incubi. Moreover, he thinks that they are
deficient in their ability to belief in God. He comes up with grotesque
roots of the word femina
"feminine", namely, fides
"belief" and minus "less."
In support of his arguments
he often cites the Bible,refers to Thomas Aquinas superstition theory,
and emphasizes Pope Innocent's 1484 Witches Bull (see below).
It was one of the most pernicious books of world literature that had
devastating consequences in particular for women. It appeared in
29 editions between
1487 and 1669. This period also marked the peak of the European mass
hysteria.
On 25 August 1538, Martin Luther
had a discussion about witches and sorceresses who steal chicken eggs out
of nests, or steal milk and butter. Doctor Martin said: "One should show
no mercy to these [women]; I would burn them myself, for we read in the
Law that the priests were the ones to begin the stoning of criminals" (WA
Tr 4, 51-52, no. 3979 quoted and translated in Karant-Nunn, 236).
One historian reports that "Protestants
blamed the witch trials on the methods of the Catholic Inquisition and the
theology of Catholic scholasticism, while Catholic scholars indignantly
retorted that Lutheran preachers drew more witchcraft theory from Luther
and the Bible than from medieval Catholic thinkers" (H.C.
Erik Midelfort, Witch Hunting in Southwestern Germany 1562-1684).
Papal
In 1374 pope
Gregory XI declared that all magic was done with the aid of demons and
thus was open to prosecution for heresy.
In 1484 Pope
Innocent VIII published the Witches Bull Summis desiderantes
affectibus ("Desiring with the Greatest
Ardor") in which he condemned witchcraft as Satanism, which is the worst
of all possible heresies.
b.) The five common
witchcraft offences
These acts were connected
or cumulative, that is, one leading to another. The sentence was generally
death as demanded in the Biblical passage "Thou shalt not suffer a witch
to live (Exodus 22:18). Execution was usually by burning at the stake.
A judge accusing
a huddling and trembling
from fear woman:
You
apostate, you witch, you dumb dog! Confess your sin of witchery, reveal
the names of your accomplices! You filthy whore, you devil's wanton, you
sackcloth-maker, you dumb toad! Speak and confess in God's name! Swallow
the holy salt! Drink the holy water! Tell who it was that taught you
witchcraft, and whom you saw and recognized at the
witches' Sabbath. Then you will not be tortured any more but have eternal
life (reported in a 1676 book by Hermann Löher, a former judge who had to
flee Germany after being accused of being a witch).
The
victims are compelled to confess what they could not possibly have done:
1. A pact with the
devil to perform evil acts for the devil in return for rewards such as
money, supernatural and malevolent sorcery abilities from him. At first
the poor accused were told to confess. They were then stripped naked,
shaved, pricked with needles for insensitive spots and then examined for
marks of the devil.
2. Intercourse with
devils.
Women, men, and children
were accused and confessed to having had intercourse with devils. The
Incubus (plural Incubi) from the Latin incubare
for being placed on top (incubating) was a male devil who had sex with
females. The Succubus (plural Succubi) from the Latin
succumbere for being placed below was a
female devil who copulated with males.
Another widespread theory was that the devil was asexual (sexless). He
would first as a Succubus extract sperm from a male, then transform into
an Incubus and use that sperm to impregnate a female. Deformed born
children were considered evidence of such a union and got the mother into
trouble. In all cases, intercourse with the devil was considered a willful
act of submission and dedication to the devil. Hence, it was a deliberate
turning away from God.
3.
Witch's flight and and transformation into animals
Witches on brooms could
fly thru the air to meetings with the devil and other witches. Moreover,
they could transform themselves into a variety of animals, for example,
werewolves. These supernatural abilities were granted by the devil as part
of the pact with him.
4. Participation in the
witches' Sabbath
This occurred usually at
midnight in distant places where the participants arrived by supernatural
means. It was a meeting place for witches and other devil worshippers.
Here they would engage in individual sex with the devil and also
participate in orgies, that is, in feasting, wild celebrations, and sex
with multiple partners in worship of the devil.
5.
Malevolent sorcery
These most harmful
abilities were granted by the devil as part of the contract with him. The
alleged witches were accused of us using black magic to bring about
disasters that effected the many such as floods, droughts, bad harvests,
and pestilences like the black death. Also, they brought about misfortunes
that effected individuals: accidents, loss of property, loss of a loved
one, infertility, and bad health. They used incantations (formulas and
chants), curses, profanity, and blasphemous utterances to invoke the devil
who would bring about the malicious, wished-for circumstances. Moreover,
merely touching or an evil glance from a witch could be disastrous for
things or beings.
c.) The
condemned Johannes Junius explains his confession
He had been incarcerated
in the witch prison of the city of Bamberg, Germany. Under excruciating
torture, he had finally confessed to witchcraft. While awaiting execution,
he wrote the following letter to his daughter:
Many hundred thousand goodnights, dearly beloved daughter Veronica. Innocent I have come to prison, innocent have I been tortured, innocent must I die. For whosoever comes into the witch prison must be a witch or be tortured until he invents something out of his head ... I will tell you how it has gone to me ... the executioner ... put the thumbscrews on me, that blood ran out at the nails and everywhere. So that for four weeks I could not use my hands as you can see from my writing ... Thereafter the stripped me, bound my hands behind me, and drew me up in torture. Then I thought heaven and earth were at an end; eight times did they draw me up and let me fall again, so that I suffered a terrible agony. The executioner said, "Sir, I beg you for God's sake confess something, whether it be true or not, for you cannot endure the torture which you will be put to, and even if you bear it all, yet you will not escape" ... [He then explained the confession he gave] Now my dear child you have all my confession, for which I must die. And they are sheer lies and made up things, so help me God. For all this I was forced to say through fear of torture which was threatened beyond what I had endured. For they never leave off with the torture till one confesses something, be he ever so good, he must be a witch. Nobody escapes ... (Margaret Knight in Honest to man: Christian ethics re-examined, p.92-93) d.) The trial and execution of nine year old Christine Teipel Among the 20,000 or so witch trials is the well-known trial of the nine year old child Christine Teipel (1621-1630) in Oberkirchen which is located in the eastern part of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. On March 7, 1630, Christine was interrogated and named 15 more persons, 8 men, 6 women, and a little girl, who allegedly had participated in nightly devil-dances. The named where then arrested and tortured. In turn, they revealed more followers of the devil. From April to June, 1630 there were as a consequence seven series of witch-trials in which 58 persons were convicted and burned at the stake, among them 22 men and two children. On Mai 4, 1630 as part of the third series of witch trials, Christine Teipel was executed. There are commemorative plaques that remind visitors of the witch hunts and the trial of Christine Teipel in the "Witches Square" in the Lüttmecke at Oberkirchen. 18. The Reformation and Counter-Reformation (1517-1648) The Reformation was sparked by the Augustinian Monk Martin Luther (1483-1546). It was primarily indignation over spiritual or theological corruption in the Roman Catholic Church that compelled him to act. Secular or temporal depravity in the Church was merely the means for him to get the many disgusted with the Church and establish a theologically reformed church. He found support among some of the 225 German princes who saw this as an opportunity to confiscate the Church's wealth in their domain and get rid of papal authority, taxes and other impositions. The Protestant revolution was initiated when Luther in 1517 published his 95 theses that challenged the theology and practice of selling indulgences (forgivenesses for sins). In the subsequent religious wars, the Roman Catholic Church was supported by conservatives who wanted to maintain the traditional order, the emperor, most princes, and the higher-up clergy such as bishops who administrated large estates. The Lutherans were supported by the North German princes, the lower clergy, the trade and business classes, and large segments of the peasantry. By the end of this struggle with Catholic powers in 1648, Protestantism was firmly established and forms now together with Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy the three major branches of Christianity. Luther suffered from the idea that he had to earn God's mercy thru his own efforts such as doing good works. This he perceived as a struggle in which he could probably not succeed. But a passage in the Bible solved his problem, for Romans 3:28 states: "Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law [demanding all sorts of action such as good works]." He found other passages in the Bible that made it clear to him that his Church needed to be reformed. It was only after the Church refused to listen and excommunicated and persecuted him, that he started a new reformed church. Her are Luther's fivefold "alone . . ." doctrines to reform Christianity:
Hence, the princes decided on the religion of their choice which would become the only "choice" for the population under their control. This is the ancient prerogative of powerful despots: "He who rules, determines the religion of the fools." 1618 to 1648--The Horrors of the Thirty Years' Religious War This war involved most of the powerful nations of continental Europe and was mainly fought on German soil. It started about disagreements between Catholics and Protestants about unresolved underlying problems and different interpretations of the 1555 Peace of Augsburg (above). The main adversaries were the Catholic Habsburg Dynasty and their allies against the Protestant princes of German supported by Denmark and Sweden. As the war dragged on, major nations involved used the war to regain or gain more territory. Many of the contending armies were mercenaries, many of whom did not get paid. Thus, they turned to a predatory strategy that embodied much of this conflict.
Finally, there was religious peace within the Holy Roman Empire and it would survive until its dissolution in 1806. The major denominations now lived in relative peace on the continent. The main tenets of the Peace of Westphalia were:
Significance for the concepts of diplomacy among nation-states:
These principles of tolerance allowed Catholic and Protestant factions to cooperate and go to war for reasons of state and not for reasons of religion. And to this day, the Catholic and Protestant churches have dominated Germany’s spiritual and educational life including that of philosophy. As a consequence of this dominance, at most German universities, the chair of philosophy belongs to one or other of the two churches. Thus, most philosophy departments at German universities are the de facto handmaidens of religion. This in part explains why religious philosophers such as Kant and Heidegger are held in high esteem on account of their religious but not philosophical contributions. Kant's widely celebrated Critique of Pure Reason and Heidegger's Being and Time are massive works of mystification and camouflage promoting religion. 19. The Peasant's Revolt, Luther's Betrayal and Slave Morality 1524 to 1525--Peasant uprisings occurred frequently during the Middle Ages. This particular revolt was an economic and religious uprising by peasants, townsfolk and nobles, however, there was no common program. Between 70,000 and100,000 had died by the time the revolt was put down. At this time in medieval Europe, the peasants were mainly serfs who where bound to the land, that is, they could be bought, sold or transferred with the land. They had to work the landholders and their own fields with the landholders parcels having priority. As the peasants were increasingly oppressed and exploited to the point were it was no longer bearable, they demanded democratic reform and basic human rights as stated in the Twelve Articles below. This document was one of the first to demand such reforms and rights, and it appeared first in Memmingen (Germany) on February 1525. However, their grievances were ridiculed and dismissed, and so they revolted. Details of the Peasants' situation and oppression may be inferred from their grievances as summarized in these articles: The Twelve Articles of Demands and Aims by the Peasant Movement
The peasants have taken on themselves the burden of three terrible sins against God and man, by which they have abundantly merited death in body and soul. In the first place, they have sworn to be true and faithful, submissive and obedient, to their rulers, as Christ commands, when he says, ‘Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's,’ and in Romans XIII, ‘Let everyone be subject unto the higher powers.’ Because they are breaking this obedience, and are setting themselves against the higher powers, willfully and with violence, they have forfeited body and soul, as faithless, perjured, lying, disobedient knaves and scoundrels are wont to do. St. Paul passed this judgment on them in Romans XIII when he said, that they who resist the power will bring a judgment upon themselves. This saying will smite the peasants sooner or later, for it is God's will that faith be kept and duty done. In the second place, they are starting a rebellion, and violently robbing and plundering monasteries and castles which are not theirs, by which they have a second time deserved death in body and soul, if only as highwaymen and murderers. Besides, any man against whom it can be proved that he is a maker of sedition is outside the law of God and Empire, so that the first who can slay him is doing right and well [Jesus was crucified for sedition, so according to Luther the Romans did the right thing]. For if a man is an open rebel every man is his judge and executioner, just as when a fire starts, the first to put it out is the best man. For rebellion is not simple murder, but is like a great fire, which attacks and lays waste a whole land. Thus rebellion brings with it a land full of murder and bloodshed, makes widows and orphans, and turns everything upside down, like the greatest disaster. Therefore let everyone who can, smite, slay and stab, secretly or openly, remembering that nothing can be more poisonous, hurtful or devilish than a rebel. It is just as when one must kill a mad dog; if you do not strike him, he will strike you, and a whole land with you. In the third place, they cloak this terrible and horrible sin with the Gospel, call themselves ‘Christian brothers’, receive oaths and homage, and compel people to hold with them to these abominations. Thus they become the greatest of all blasphemers of God and slanderers of his holy Name, serving the devil, under the outward appearance of the Gospel, thus earning death in body and soul ten times over. . . . It does not help the peasants, when they pretend that, according to Genesis I and II, all things were created free and common, and that all of us alike have been baptized. For under the New Testament Moses does not count; for there stands our Master, Christ, and subjects us, with our bodies and our property, to the emperor and the law of this world, when he says, ‘Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's.’ Paul, too, says, in Romans XII, to all baptized Christians, ‘Let every man be subject to the power’, and Peter says, ‘Be subject to every ordinance of man.’ By this doctrine of Christ we are bound to live, as the Father commands from heaven, saying, ‘This is My beloved Son; hear him.’ For baptism does not make men free in body and property, but in soul; and the Gospel does not make goods common, except in the case of those who do of their own free will what the apostles and disciples did in Acts IV. They did not demand, as do our insane peasants in their raging, that the goods of others - of a Pilate and a Herod - should be common, but only their own goods. Our peasants, however, would have other men's goods common, and keep their own goods for themselves. Fine Christians these! I think there is not a devil left in hell; they have all gone into the peasants. Their raving has gone beyond all measure. Since the peasants, then, have brought both God and man down upon them and are already so many times guilty of death in body and soul, since they submit to no court and wait for no verdict, but only rage on, I must instruct the worldly governors how they are to act in the matter with a clear conscience. First. I will not oppose a ruler who, even though be does not tolerate the Gospel, will smite and punish these peasants without offering to submit the case to judgment. For he is within his rights, since the peasants are not contending any longer for the Gospel, but have become faithless, perjured, disobedient, rebellious murderers, robbers and blasphemers, whom even heathen rulers have the right and power to punish; nay, it is their duty to punish them, for it is just for this purpose that they bear the sword, and are ‘the ministers of God upon him that doeth evil’ [my emphases]. Evaluation: Luther is Preaching a Perfect Slave Morality Luther cites: Jesus: "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's" (Mathew 22:21). Paul: "Let every soul be subject unto higher powers. For there is no power but that of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God; and they that resisteth shall receive to them themselves damnation" (Romans 13:1-2). Peter says, "Submit yourself to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme; Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of the evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well" (1 Peter 2:13-14) But Luther is wrong when he states "For under the New Testament Moses does not count;" This disregards that the "historical" Jesus was a practicing Jew, who taught that the social laws of the Hebrew Scriptures must be followed. He emphasizes: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill" (Matthew 5:17) These laws at least implicitly condemned all exploitation, oppression and enslavement. Conclusion, according to Luther: 1. The rulers who do not obey the Gospel, or may even be heathens, may "with a clear conscience" and without a legal "judgment" "smite and punish" the peasants if in the ruler's opinion they disregard the Gospel. 2. The ruled, however, whether Gospel-obeying or not, have no rights whatsoever to defend themselves even if the ruler's oppression and lawlessness violates the Gospel and the common-sense moral decencies. Luther, nevertheless, benefited from his violent and illogical prejudices. The pamphlet convinced the rulers that Luther was determined to uphold the existing social order. Thus, the Lutheranism would neither threaten their power nor their privileges. If however, he had supported the Peasants' revolt, that would have doomed his theological reform from lasting beyond the 1520s. E. Enslaving, Colonizing, Proselytizing in the Name of Christianity 20. Theological and Biblical "Justification" for Slavery 21. Slavery from 107 CE to 1888 CE 22. The Colonization of Latin America 23. The First 20th Century Genocide in German South-West Africa 24. Proselytizing by God's Chinese Son Causes 20 Million Death20. Theological and Biblical "Justification" for Slavery Theological support ca. 390 - Saint John Chrysostom (meaning the golden-mouthed, 347-407) reemphasizes the New Testament when he demands: The slave should be resigned to his lot, in obeying his master he is obeying God ... ca. 400--Saint Augustine (354-430) wrote in his City of God: ... slavery is not penal in character and planned by that law which commands the preservation of the natural order and forbids disturbance. With other words, slavery was God's will, and by teaching this, Christianity did not make slaves free but made good slaves out of bad ones. In the 18th century--the Anglican Bishop of London (reign 1723-1748), Edmund Gibson, expresses the thinking of the upper Christian clergy when he observes that Christianity does not change the master-slave relationship: The freedom which Christianity gives, is a Freedom from the Bondage of Sin and Satan, and from the Domination of Men's Lusts and Passions and inordinate Desires; but as to their outward Condition, whatever that was before, whether bond or free, their being baptized, and becoming Christians, makes no manner of Change in it. Support for slavery in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) Leviticus 25:44-46 [How to buy and sell slaves.] Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, [shall be] of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids. Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that [are] with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit [them for] a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour. Exodus 21:2-6 [How Hebrew slaves should be treated.] If thou buy a Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself: if he were married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master have given him a wife, and she have borne him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he shall go out by himself. And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free: then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the doorpost; and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him for ever. Exodus 21:7-11 [How to deal with female sex slaves.] And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do. If she please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he let her be redeemed: to sell her unto a strange nation he shall have no power, seeing he hath dealt deceitfully with her. And if he have betrothed her unto his son, he shall deal with her after the manner of daughters If he take him another wife, her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish. And if he do not these three unto her, then shall she go out free without money. Exodus 21:20-21 [How to beat a slave to death with a clear conscience] And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished. Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two [to live], he shall not be punished: for he is his money [property]. Support for slavery in the Christian Bible (New Testament) Ephesians 6:5 Servants, be obedient to them that are [your] masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ; 1 Timothy 6:1-2 Let as many servants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honour, that the name of God and [his] doctrine be not blasphemed. And they [Christians] that have believing [Christian] masters, let them not despise [them], because they are brethren; but rather do [them] service, because they are faithful and beloved, partakers of the benefit. These things teach and exhort. Luke 12:47-48 And that servant, which knew his lord's will, and prepared not [himself], neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many [stripes]. But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few [stripes]. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more. Titus 2:9-10 [Exhort] servants to be obedient unto their own masters, [and] to please [them] well in all [things]; not answering again; Not purloining [stealing], but shewing [showing] all good fidelity; that they may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things. 21. Slavery from 107 CE to 1888 CE The Christian church became the biggest slave owner in the Roman Empire. Popes kept slaves until the eighteenth century. Altogether, Christianity supported the notion of slavery for more than eighteen hundred years. Slavery together with torture and murder is probably the worst thing a person can do to another. It may be safely assumed that the practice of slavery dates to prehistoric times but became institutionalized when the products of agriculture allowed larger organized societies to form. Involuntary subjection to another is a matter of degree:
Slaves
in Chains
(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
Slavery in North America, roughly the boundary of present day U.S.,
began in ca. 1640 and lasted until 1865. People of African descent were
legally but inhumanely held captive. Their owners were mostly whites, but
a very small number of American Indians and free blacks also owned them.
By many in the North, and eminent statesman such as George Washington,
Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, slavery was
regarded as evil and inconsistent with the 1776 Declaration of
Independence. Still, the slave population
rose from 893,603 in 1800 to 3,953,760 when the 1860 census was taken.
Approximately one Southern family in four held slaves prior to the Civil
War. According to the 1860 U.S. census, fewer than 385,000 individuals
(i.e. 1.4% of White Americans in the country, or 4.8% of southern whites)
owned one or more slaves. 95% of blacks lived in the South, comprising one
third of the population there as opposed to 1% of the population of the
North.
Am I Not A Man And A
Brother.
From the title page to abolitionist Anthony Benezet's book
Some Historical Account of Guinea, London, 1788
(Photo source: Wikimedia
Commons).
Long after the legal abolition of slavery in the U.S., the former slaves
were discriminated against when denied equal treatment before the law,
job opportunities, education, and housing. They were referred to as sambos,
which is a disparaging and offensive racial slur. As late as the early
20th century, they were associated with apes in exhibitions (see Ota Benga below).
Pigmies and European
Explorer
Some Pygmies were
exhibited in human zoos, such as Ota Benga, below,
displayed by eugenicist
Madison Grant In the Bronx (U.S.) Zoo.
(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons).
Ota Benga
(ca.1883-1916) was a Congolese pigmy who was featured in a 1906
human zoo exhibit at the Bronx
(U.S.) Zoo alongside an orangutan (Photos source:
Wikimedia Commons).
22.
The Colonization of Latin America
For "God, glory, and gold," or "glory, greed, and religious
crusading zeal," as one Spanish conquistador confirmed when he explained
that he and his kind went to the New World to "serve God and His Majesty,
to give light to those who were in darkness, and to grow rich, as all men
desire to do." (quotes from J. J.
Spielvogel's Western Civilization,
Vol. II)
Introduction. Latin America was colonized by Spain
and Portugal. The rulers of these two countries received extensive
authority and "moral justification" from the Roman Catholic Church in
their efforts to conquer these lands, abolish their cultures, and firmly
establish their governments. Roman Catholicism was the only recognized
religion in the colonies. However, Church policy and organization was
delegated to, thus, determined by the monarchs. In exchange for
Christianizing, "educating," and pacifying the Native Americans, the Roman
Church and the various Catholic religious orders were awarded many
privileges and immense areas of territory.
In October
1492--Christopher Columbus (1451-1506), on behalf of Queen Isabella of
Spain, was looking for a westward sea route to Asia. On this expedition,
he discovered the Americas for Catholic European nations when he reached
and explored the Bahamas, the coastline of Cuba, and the northern shores
of Hispaniola, which is today's Haiti and the Dominican Republic. In
subsequent voyages, he reached all the major islands of the Caribbean Sea
and the mainland of Central America.
The following events eventually culminated in one of the bloodiest periods
in human history and in an apex of papal power:
Girl
Smallpox Victim
(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
However,
Spain, Europe, and the Vatican gained tremendously in wealth and power:
Between 1880 and 1914, European nations, all solidly Christian, raced to colonize the entire continent of Africa (see map below). During this scramble for African territory, the English made it clear that they were not interested in the territory of South-West Africa, and so in 1884 it was declared a German protectorate. At that time it was Germany's only overseas territory deemed suitable for white settlement.
Map showing European claimants to the African continent in 1913. Almost all of the continent was colonized by European nations (Photo source: Wikimedia Commons). 1904 to 1907--The Herero and Nama Genocide On January 12, 1904, the Herero people under Samuel Maharero rose in rebellion against the German colonial rule in German South-West Africa or what is now modern-day Namibia. They killed about 120 Germans, including women and children, and destroyed their farms. In response, the German Government dispatched 14,000 soldiers to resolve the crisis. Their leader, Lothar von Trotha issued an ultimatum to the Hereros: I, the great general of the German troops, send this letter to the Herero people... All Hereros must leave this land... Any Herero found within the German borders with or without a gun, with or without cattle, will be shot. I shall no longer receive any women or children; I will drive them back to their people. I will shoot them. This is my decision for the Herero people. In August of the same year, the Herero were defeated in the Battle of Waterberg. They and their families were driven into the desert of Omaheke, where most of them died of thirst. In October, the Nama also took up arms against the Germans, and were dealt with in a similar fashion. In total, some 65,000 Herero (80 percent of the total Herero population), and 10,000 Nama (50 percent of the total Nama population) perished. Characteristic of the genocide was death by starvation and the poisoning of wells for the Herero and Nama population that was trapped in the Namib Desert.Although General Trotha's orders to kill every male Herero and drive the women and children into the desert were lifted in 1904 by the German Emperor, it was too late to prevent the massacre. By the end of 1904, survivors, mostly women and children, were herded into concentration camps. and given as slave labour to German businesses, where many died of overwork and malnutrition. German enterprises were able to rent Herero people for manpower, and death of workers was permitted, and reported to the German authorities. Forced labor, disease, and malnutrition killed an estimated 50 to 80 percent of the entire Herero population by 1908, when the camps were closed (citation required). This extermination thus qualifies as genocide.
Surviving Herero
reduced to skeletons
(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons).
In 1985, the United Nations' Whitaker Report recognized Germany's attempt to exterminate the Herero and Nama peoples of South-West Africa as one of the earlier attempts at genocide in the 20th century. The German government has also apologized for the atrocities in 2004. 24. Proselytizing by God's Chinese Son Causes 20 Million Death It was an attempt, between 1850 and 1864, by Hong Xiuquan (1814-64) to make China a new Christian kingdom. He became a Christian convert after reading a Chinese translation of the Bible. It made him realize that in an earlier dream-vision he had seen God the Father and His son, Jesus. Moreover, in this dream, he was anointed as Jesus' younger brother, that is, God's Chinese son. He thus felt empowered and would form what was probably the most effective messianic Christian revolutionary movement of all times. Western scholars usually name it the Taiping, meaning "Great Peace," rebellion. Background that made the movement possible. In the 18th and 19th centuries there was a great demand in the West for Chinese luxury goods such as porcelain, silk, and tea. China, however, was a self-sufficient country with little need for western goods. Hence, western traders, initially Portuguese but later mostly British, exported opium from India and sold it to China. Levels of opium addiction grew fast and had a negative effect on large segments of society including the imperial troops and the official classes. Hence, the Chinese Government tried to outlaw the opium trade. The western powers, however, did not want to lose the most lucrative opium trade and successfully defended it in two wars. By the time of the first opium war (1839-42), import to China had grown from 200 chests a year in 1729 to 40,000 chests (a chest weighing 140 pounds). This war was won by Great Britain and it halted Chinese efforts to stop the trade. As the opium addiction worsened, the Chinese tried to stop it once more. By the time of the second opium war (1856-60), imports had grown to around 60,000 chests a year. After France and Britain won this war, a series of agreements, supplementing existing ones, were imposed on the Chinese:
|