V.4                Origins and Growth of Christianity
                        Until the Protestant Reformation in the 16th Century,
                    This is Mostly about the Roman Catholic Version of Christianity
 
Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
                                               George Santayana (1863-1952)
 
He who begins by loving Christianity better than Truth, will proceed by loving his own sect or Church better than Christianity, and end in loving himself better than all.
                  S. T. Coleridge (1772-1834) in Aids to Reflection.
 
Jesus of Nazareth was executed as a political enemy of the oppressive Roman Empire. But Paul--a Roman citizen and self-appointed Apostle of Jesus--stood Jesus's teaching on its head when he preached slavish obedience and threatened: "they that resisteth shall receive to themselves damnation" (Romans 13:1-2). And Paulinism* under the name of Christianity was eventually accepted as a friend and supporter of the Roman Empire and became its and other tyrannical "powers that be" from the top imposed state religion.
*14 of the 27 parts of the New Testament are credited to Paul.
                                                                           This writer
 
Introduction
A. Early Christianity and the "Historical" Jesus
1. Key Events and Intro to the Gospels
2. The Life Events of Jesus
3. The Ethical Teachings of Jesus
4. The Wicked Teachings of Jesus
5. The Theology of Jesus
B. Reformed Christianity and the Deified Jesus
6. Paulinization Makes Faith Palatable to Gentiles and the Powerful
7. Hellenization Reforms the Faith and Deifies Jesus
8. Key Events prior to the Christian 4th Century
C. Institutionalized Christianity and the Monopolized Jesus
9. The Institutionalization and Imposition of Christianity
10. Political Victory Paves the Way for the Practices of Brahmanism
11. The Emerging Papacy and Its Claim to Own Jesus' Church
12. The Papacy's High Point under Boniface the "Freethinker"
D.   Actualized Christianity--Pernicious Pursuits in the Name of Jesus
13. The Growth and Corruption of the Papacy (6th-17th cent.)
14. The Persecution and Massacres of Jews
15. The Crusades Against Moslems, Pagans, and Other Christians
16. The Inquisition
17. The Witchcraft Trials (1330-1700)
18. The Reformation and Counter-Reformation
19. The Peasant's Revolt, Luther's Betrayal and Slave Morality
E.  Enslaving, Colonizing, Proselytizing in the Name of Christianity
20. Theological and Biblical "Justification" for Slavery
21. Slavery from 107 CE to 1888 CE
22. The Colonization of Latin America
23. The First 20th Century Genocide in German South-West Africa
24. Proselytizing by God's Chinese Son Causes 20 Million Death
 
 
Introduction
For better and worse, Christianity has been most influential since the 4th century in shaping Western culture and world events. Moreover, there is evidence that in future this influence will increase rather than diminish. And since this will effect all earthlings, it is well-justified to spent more time and take a closer look at this particular world religion and its dominant advocate and world power, the Roman Catholic* Church. And the Catholic Encyclopedia substantiates the preceding statement when it asserts:
·         No one who is interested in human history, past and present, can ignore the Catholic Church, either as an institution which has been the central figure in the civilized world for nearly two thousand years, decisively affecting its destinies, religious, literary, scientific, social and political, or as an existing power whose influence and activity extend to every part of the globe.
·         In the past century the Church as grown both extensively and intensively among English-speaking peoples.
·         Their living interests demand that they should have the means of informing themselves about this vast institution, which, whether they are Catholics or not, affects their fortunes and their destiny (my emphases and bullets).
 
This chapter contains critical information for people everywhere about this “vast institution” since it “affects their fortunes and their destiny.” There is a need for this text because much of the info disseminated by the Roman Church seems to be self-servingly “mistaken” and is often outright false and contradictory. All this had pernicious consequences in the past as demonstrated by historical facts. Moreover, there is strong evidence that some of these calamities are still with us. Hence, an objective, and for the most part verifiable, account of this religious and political world power is urgently needed.
*the term catholic originated from the Greek katholikos, “universal” and from katholou, “in general.” The technical use of the word seems to have been established by the beginning of the 3rd century. What the term catholic is claimed to entail was expressed by the French theologian Vincent of Lérins as follows: “That which has been believed everywhere, always, and by all. This is what is truly and properly catholic.”
     By taking over the Hebrew scriptures as their own legitimate heritage, Christians (and Muslims later) were able to show to their own satisfaction that their faith could be traced back to the very beginning of Creation itself. Also, they appropriated the God of this work, Abraham's God, as their very own. Moreover, they labeled the Hebrew scriptures as the "Old Testament" because with the coming of Christ the Messiah, as predicted in these scriptures, a new contract, the New Testament, made the Hebrew contract or testament with God obsolete. Note that The New Testament writings are not considered in the classical sense “historical.”
     To really understand a tradition such as Christianity and its most dominant institution, is to know their history--their origins and development over time. Among the 6,000 million Earthlings now living, 1/3 or 2,000 million are at least nominally Christians. And over 1/2 of these Christians are Catholics while the other half belongs to the Eastern Orthodox Church and some 33,000 distinct and separate Protestant churches. So, Roman Catholicism is by far the largest group. But more importantly, it is historically and presently by far the most influential religion, and its past indicates that it is capable of doing great evil while appearing innocently doing the work of God.
     To avoid in future the horrendous atrocities, wars, and rotten compromises between church and state debited to mostly Catholic Christianity, one must link these events to their justification by the Church hierarchy that was often based on the writings of the Bible and that of its leading theologians. While much of this writing below applies to all of Christianity, a substantial part is an analysis and critique of the Roman Church and its fundamental mission to convert the whole of humanity, if necessary by force, not to Christianity but to Catholicism.
     This writing is not a criticism of Christians who are like most believers of other religions perhaps misguided but substantially innocent. In any case, almost all are morally better than their religion because they practice what makes living in communities possible. These are The Common Moral Decencies, which are rules of behavior that have naturally developed everywhere and long before organized religion appeared. However, Christians and other believers should consult their conscience, for through their allegiance, they at least indirectly support the goals and actions of their religion.
   To help organized Christianity in general and Roman Catholicism in particular, so that they can learn from mistakes of the past and reform accordingly, is the main intend of this text besides informing the reader. 
For a critique of concepts see:
Egregious Errors in Religions
Abuse of Children in Religions
Hatred of Women in Religions
Probing Supernatural Claims
Intellectual Giants Critical of Religion
 
A. Early Christianity and the "Historical" Jesus
 
1. Key Events and Intro to the Gospels
2. The Life Events of Jesus
3. The Ethical Teachings of Jesus
4. The Wicked Teachings of Jesus
5. The Theology of Jesus
1.  Key Events and Intro to the Gospels
Around 30 CE Christianity had its beginnings when the ca. 30 year old Jesus of Nazareth emerged. He was probably a Galilean Jew, but little else is known about him prior to that appearance. He was a charismatic, wandering preacher who lived between 6-3 BCE to 30 or 33 CE. Also, Jesus had the reputation of a healer, wonderworker, and exorcist. Judging from the Passovers mentioned in the Gospels, his missionary work lasted only 1-3 years. The "historical" Jesus was a practicing Jew, who taught that the social laws of the Hebrew Scriptures must be followed. He insists: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill" (Matthew 5:17) These laws implicitly condemned all exploitation, oppression and enslavement at least among the Hebrew people (see Judaism in The Most Influential Religions). The term "historical" above is in quotation marks because Jesus was a legendary not a historical figure, for we have no eyewitness reports of him.
     But most importantly, Jesus and his followers thought that he was the Messiah promised in the Hebrew Scriptures who would solve the perennial problems of the Hebrews and establish God's kingdom on earth. Jesus promised:
Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the son of man coming in his kingdom (Mathew 16:28).
Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled (Mathew 24:34).
     This "Before the end of the present generation . . . is also stated in the other two Synoptic Gospels (Luke 9:27; Mark 9:1). For wanting to establish a new kingdom he was crucified (ca. 33 CE) by the Roman Empire and after being found guilty of the political crime of sedition, the stirring up of discontent and rebellion, against the Roman Empire. He was not executed for a religious crime such as heresy by the Jews for which stoning would have been the appropriate measure at that time.
But in addition to the tenets of Judaism, he also proclaimed ideas from a minor offspring of Judaism known as the Essenes. These concepts probably found their way into this sect from Buddhism and Zoroastrianism. It allowed Jesus to offer something new in Judaism, namely, a new ethics and the teaching in parables from Buddhism, and a new theology of last things (the last judgment, end of the world, etc.) and salvation leading to everlasting life from Zoroastrianism. But he also spoke of the end of the world and the coming of the eternal kingdom in such urgent manner that his followers clearly expected it to happen in their own lifetime.
While Christianity is a historical fact, Jesus of Nazareth is not because there is no eyewitness account of him. However, there is good secondary evidence that he actually existed. His followers saw no need to write things down, for they believed his prophesy that the end was imminent. Moreover, most if not all members of his inner circle, the twelve apostles were illiterate who on the prediction of immanent doom had deserted their families to save their souls.
From the mid 30s to 137 there was, initially as part of Judaism, a Judaic-Christian community in Jerusalem. It was the center of what would be later separated out as a new religion. But the center shifted to Rome under the influence of some leading apostles such as Paul for sure and perhaps Peter. And by 137, Judaic Christianity had completely disappeared or was absorbed by an intermediate Pauline Christianity that in turn was absorbed by the 4th century by an institutionalized Christianity.
From the 50s to the 60th, Paul, initially a persecutor and killer of Christians, apparently concluded that if you cannot fight them, join them. He appointed himself as an apostle of Jesus of Nazareth and claimed that the dead Jesus commissioned him to interpret and spread his teachings. In the process he did not spiritually convert to Judaic Christianity but converted, "Paulinized," the faith. This action made the religion palatable to non-Jews and the authorities of the Roman Empire as well as emperors elsewhere. It was the groundwork on which in the 4th century Imperial Christianity would be build.
Between the late 60s and early 100s, as the imminent end did not come, and as firsthand witnesses to Jesus' activities were dying, there arose the need to produce works that would testify to his life and teachings. It was during this time and this writing activity that the "historical" Jesus of Nazareth, a wandering religious teacher, became the mythological Jesus Christ or Jesus the Messiah. Many accounts or Gospels were written in, but only the four "authorized" Gospels "according to" Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John were retained in the Christian scriptures known as the New Testament. The authors of the Gospels apparently learned from the communities that were instructed by Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John. But these evangelists did not know Jesus personally. However, it is claimed that the information was somehow revealed to them by Jesus Christ.
Intro to the Gospels
Jesus' life events, ethics, teachings, and theology are found in the Synoptic gospels. However, neither Jesus nor his original disciples left any writings behind. Also, it is not known who wrote these gospels. The names now appearing as authors were attached late in the second century. The first three of the gospels of the New Testament, Mark, Matthew, and Luke are known as the Synoptic--meaning "at one look"--Gospels because they give a general view of the teaching and life of Jesus.
     "The religion of Jesus Christ is neither new nor strange," wrote Eusebius of Caesarea (ca. 283-371 CE) the early historian of the Christian Church (in Church History, Book IV). And this conclusion by Eusebius seems to be correct, for indeed Jesus' life and teachings are for the most part parallel and almost identical to that of older mythologies and religions. Recorded at least five hundred years earlier, Jesus' life events and ethics are that of the Buddha, and his theology is that of Zoroastrianism. These teachings had found their way into the Essenes (ca. 100 BCE-50 CE), a Jewish sect of ascetics and mystics of whom Jesus was apparently a learned member before he struck out to form his own sect.
     New are Jesus' apparently wicked teachings which are not found in those older religions though they have parallels in the Hebrew Scriptures. Also, new is the emphasis on a second coming to usher in the kingdom of God "Before the end of the present generation . . . which is stated in all three of the Synoptic Gospels (Mathew 16:28, 24:34; Luke 9:27; Mark 9:1) and also in Peter I, 4:7. However, this harshness and the failed prediction are not mentioned, glossed over, or explained away in the Gospel of John, the fourth gospel, thus, saving the faith by moving it in the direction of a mysterious plausibility.
Note: All biblical quotes are from the King James Version and were checked against the German translation of the Bible by Martin Luther.
2.  The Life Events of Jesus
These events, and his ethics below, are found in the three synoptic gospels. Mark's is the oldest one (ca. 60 CE) and was probably the primary source for Mathew (ca. 70 CE) and Luke (ca. 80 CE). Mathew and Luke added material to Mark's account from a source known as "Q," from the German for Quelle (source) which does no longer exists. All three tell basically the same story, but the special interests these authors pursue reflect important differences. Mark's gospel starts with Jesus' adult life--there is no virgin birth. However, it was easy to add later all sorts of claims to make the faith competitive because it was initially an oral tradition. Hence, it was flexible when compared with the rigidity of the later written accounts.
The life of Jesus parallels that of older mythologies and religions.
Hence it is not surprising that  For instance, the synoptic Gospels reveal:
  • Jesus' life events are close to that of the Egyptian gods Horus (ca. 2,700 BCE) and Osiris (ca. 2,400 BCE).
  • Jesus' life parallel in many ways that of the Greco-Roman god Dionysus (long before 500 BCE).
  • Jesus' life story is almost identical to that of the Indian Hindu god Krishna (before 1,500 BCE), who is the most widely revered and most popular of all Indian divinities. Krishna's story is found in the Bhagavad-Gita. 
  • Jesus' biography was apparently copied, as outlined below, from the founder of Buddhism Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha (ca. 563-ca. 483 BCE). The Buddha's life story, in turn, reflects many similarities with the older story of Krishna.
Jesus' life events are almost identical to that of the Buddha

Concerning the biographical accounts of the two religious teachers Harden-Hickey (in Remsberg's work) notes: "One account must necessarily be a copy of the other, and since the Buddhist biographer, living long before the birth of Christ, could not have borrowed from the Christian one. . . ." The following are some of the parallels presented by this writer:

  • Both have genealogies tracing their descent from ancestral kings.
  • Both were born of virgin mothers.
  • The conception of each was announced by a divine messenger.
  • The hymns uttered at the two annunciations resemble each other.
  • Both were visited by wise men who brought them gifts.
  • Both were presented in the temple.
  • The aged Simeon of the one account corresponds to the aged Asita of the other.
  • As "the child (Jesus) grew and waxed strong in spirit," so "the child (Sakay-Muni) waxed and increased in strength."
  • Both in childhood discoursed before teachers.
  • Both fasted in the wilderness.
  • Both were tempted.
  • Angels or devatas ministered to each.
  • Buddha bathed in the Narajana, and Christ was baptized in the Jordan.
  • The mission of each was proclaimed by a voice from Heaven. Both performed miracles. Both sent out disciples to propagate their faiths.
  • In calling their disciples the command of each was, "Follow me."
  • Buddha preached on the Holy Hill, and Christ delivered his sermon on the Mount.
  • The phraseology of the sermons of Buddha and the sermon ascribed to Christ is, in many instances, the same.
  • Both Buddha and Christ compare themselves to husbandmen sowing seed.
  • The story of the prodigal son is found in both Scriptures.
  • The account of the man born blind is common to both.
  • In both the mustard seed is used as a simile for littleness.
  • Christ speaks of "a foolish, man, which built his house upon the sand"; Buddha says, "Perishable is the city built of sand."
  • Both speak of "the rain which falls on the just and on the unjust."
  • The story of the ruler, Nicodemus, who came to Jesus by night, has its parallel in the story of the rich man who came to Buddha by night.
  • A converted courtesan, Magdalena, followed Jesus, and a converted courtesan, Ambapali, followed Buddha. 
  • There is a legend of a traitor connected with each.
  • Both made triumphal entries, Christ into Jerusalem, and Buddha into Rajagriba.
  • Both proclaimed kingdoms not of this world.
  • The eternal life promised by Christ corresponds to the eternal peace, Nirvana, promised by Buddha.
  • Both religions recognize a trinity.
And just like the historical Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, the historical Jesus of Nazareth, the Christ, would after his death be exalted to godhood by some of his followers.
3.  The Ethical Teachings of Jesus
Artist Carl Heinrich Bloch (1834-1890) (Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
The Sermon on the Mount (Matthew, chapters 5–7) contains the ethical gist of the New Testament but not necessarily that of organized Christian religions of which there are about 33,000 distinct and separate ones. It is a collection of religious teachings and the most important ethical sayings of Jesus of Nazareth. It is probably the best part of the whole Bible and is worth reading by believers and unbelievers alike. The sermon was addressed to disciples and a large crowd of listeners to guide them in a life of righteousness based on a new law of forgiveness and love even extended to enemies, and as opposed to the Mosaic ("Old" Testament) law of retribution.
     The sermon begins with the Beatitudes (blessed sayings) and also contains the Lord's Prayer, the Golden Rule, the commandments to turn the other cheek; to love your enemies; to judge not, that ye be not judged; and to ask and it shall be given to you.
Moreover, Jesus warns:
Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves (Mathew 7:15).
counsels:
 Ye shall know them by their fruits (Mathew 7:16).
and said:
I am the light that is above them all. I am the all; the all came forth from me, and the all attained to me. Cleave a (piece of) wood; I am there. Raise up a stone, and you will find me there (Saying 77 in the Gospel of Thomas but not included in the New Testament).

Interpretation: It means that God is everywhere and you don't need to "connect" with Him through a priest or in a church. Wherever we seek, there we shall find.

    Christians believe that Jesus is the mediator of the "New" Covenant: "But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises" (Hebrews 8:6).
     His famous Sermon on the Mount representing Mount Zion is considered by many Christian theologians to be the antithesis of the proclamation of the "Old" Covenant by Moses from Mount Sinai. Others claim that Jesus affirms Moses proclamations but goes beyond it.
     Moreover, the ethical teachings of Jesus led in 1968 to "The Liberation Theology Movement," see below for text and Gospel quotations.
The ethics of Jesus are almost verbatim the ethics of Buddhism.
Many scholars regard Jesus' "Sermon on the Mount" as comparable in its tone of moral elevation and historical importance to Buddha's Sermon in the Deer Park near Benares (now Varanasi). Still another scholar, Martin A. Larson, in his The Story of Christianity (Village Press, 1977), points out:
The ethical system of Buddhism is its most important feature; and especially to us, since it reappears substantially unaltered in the Gospel of Jesus.
Larson then cites the following quotes from the scriptures of Buddhism:
  • We must never be proud, nor harbor anger or resentment against any one.
  • Whosoever exalts himself shall be degraded.
  • Harsh language must never be used to anyone.
  • Let a man overcome anger by love . . .evil by good; the greedy by liberality, the liar by truth!
  • Let us live happily, then, not hating those who hate us . . . among men who are greedy, let us dwell free from greed!
  • We must not scrutinize the mote in another's eye, and fail to see the beam in our own.
  • No matter how unjustly one is attacked or abused, one must never strike back at an aggressor (the Buddhist commandment to turn the other cheek).
  • We are to live happily, calling nothing our own.
  • If we posses two garments, we must give one to a needy Bhikkhu [monk] who is less fortunate (this was the same ideal Jesus expressed when he said that if any one demands our coats, we should surrender our cloaks also).
  • The story of the rich man who goes to hell.
  • There is the man who is enslaved by his many properties while having no time to think of his death. But death comes and carries of that man . . . . as a flood carries of a sleeping village.
  • If the whole world and all treasures were yours, you would still not be satisfied, nor would all this be able to save you (which is also the message of Jesus).
Moreover, as observed by John E. Remsberg in his The Christ (Prometheus Books, 1994):
Buddha taught the following pentad (that is five) of commandments: 1. Not to kill; 2. not to steal; 3. not to commit adultery; 4. not to lie; 5. not to use strong drink.
Jesus instructed (Luke 18.20): "Thou knowest the commandments, [1.] do not commit adultery; [2.] do not kill; [3.] do not steal; [4.]do not bear false witness; [5] honor thy father and thy mother".

Note: Christ ignored the Decalogue (10) of Moses and, like Buddha, presented a pentad which, with the exception of one commandment, is the same as that of Buddha.

4. The Wicked Teachings of Jesus
As the gospel quotes below confirm, Jesus tells us that he has not come to save humanity but to deceive them with parables and proverbs, so that they may not understand and therefore not be saved. At this time, he will only tell his inner circle "the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven." He even cries out to God and thanks Him for keeping the truth away from the people!
     Furthermore, he informs us that "damnation of hell" awaits those who do not believe in him. Likewise, those who do not accept his rule over them, will be slain before him. Also, he has not come to bring peace, but war. Moreover, he demands that others should be converted by force, "compel them to come in, that my house may be filled."  Finally, he promises that he will break up families by raising disagreement between all members of the family, including the mother in law, so that they will fight each other as enemies.
     Finally, he declares that those children who do not love him more than they love their parents, and parents who do not love him more than they love their children, are not worthy of him. These powerful demands by Jesus, together with his prophecy of an imminent end, explain why his apostles were willing to desert their wives and children to follow him and save their souls.
  • "He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten son of God" (John 3:18).
  • "But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sad'-du-cees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers [venomous snakes], who has warned you to flee from the wrath to come? (Matthew 3:7).
  • And a little later he tells the Pharisees "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers , how can ye escape the damnation of hell? (Matthew 23:33). 
  • "But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me" (Luke 19:27).
and worse, Jesus tells us:
  • Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword (Mathew 10:34).
  • Then said he unto them, But now he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip [bag]: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one (Luke 22:36).
  • And the lord said unto the servant, Go out into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in, that my house may be filled (Luke 14:23), [This is interpreted by some as an unrestraint empowerment and demand to convert pagans by force.]
  • For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law (Mathew 10:35).
  • And a man's foes shall be they of his own household (Mathew 10:36).
  • He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me (Mathew 10:37).
  • Now the brother shall betray the brother to death, ad the father the son; and children shall rise up against their parents, and shall call them to be put to death (Mark 13:12).
But most disturbing is the deceptive purpose of Jesus' parables
Parables (allegories, analogies) are intended to convey immediate understanding and clarity of some truth, religious principle, or moral lesson. Jesus uses parables as a teaching tool often. But when asked why, he explains that his intention is to deceive people so that they may not understand and therefore not be saved at this time. And this is not an error by one of the evangelists, for all four writers of the gospels record like assertions.
First, Jesus proclaims his gratitude to God for concealing the truth in Matthew:
11:25 I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and has revealed them unto babes.
A little later he explains it in an exchange with his disciples in Matthew 13:10-17:
13:10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?
13:11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
13:12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.
13:13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.
13:14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:
13:15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
13:16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.
13:17 For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.
and again he explains his obscurantism in Luke 8:10:
 "And he said: Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.
and likewise he tells us in Mark 4:11-12:
4:11: "and he said unto them: Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God; but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables.
4:12: "That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them.
and finally Jesus is quoted in John 16:25:
These things I have spoken unto you in proverbs: but the time cometh, when I shall no more speak unto you in proverbs, but I shall shew you plainly of the Father.

Three religious explanations, with one by the current pope Benedict XVI:

1.) In Matthew 13:10-17, Jesus explains the purpose of parables. It is not to expand the meaning, but to hide the meaning from the people whom He did not want to understand. Only with the Spirit of God can we really understand the parables, but He has to give us the understanding. Certain keys unlock parables, and if we do not have the keys, we will miss the meaning, and the interpretation will be wrong, off track (anonymous author).

2.) Christ did not speak in parables to make the meaning clear to just any reader! From the very beginning, God has supervised the writing of the Bible so that it cannot be understood without outside help. Even prophets and righteous men of old did not understand, nor did the multitudes who heard the parables of Christ.  They are relegated to unbelief until a later time (i.e. the Millennium or Great White Throne Judgment), lest they rebel and must be destroyed (anonymous author).

3.) Pope Benedict XVI appears to confirm the above expressed explanations in his soon (July 2007) to be released Das Jesus-Buch des Papstes. He claims that since the New Testament texts are inspired by God, one cannot read and expect to understand without first having made the decision to believe. With other words, one must first believe in order to understand that the text is believable. Here, the Pope offers in different words the advice of Church Father Augustine (354-430 CE) who offered a perfect methodology for accepting that for which there is no evidence. He claimed:

Faith is to believe what you do not see;
the reward of this faith is to see what you believe.

     With reference to Mark 4:12 above, the Pope claims that these lines hint at the secret of the Cross and the mystery of God. In this connection, he points out that the parables convey the deepest of meaning that defies immediate understanding. Although immediate understanding is normally the purpose of a parable, the pope suggests that God was not able to do so.

Do these writers have it right or are they just explaining the strange with the more strange? Or are they just obscuring the obvious by "muddying the water, to make it seem deep"?  

5. The Theology of Jesus
Jesus' theology in the three Synoptic Gospels derives its most important concepts from the theology of Zoroastrianism. The founder of this religion, Zoroaster, was a Persian prophet who at the age of about 30 had visions that took him spiritually up to heaven more than once. There, things were revealed to him by God, Ahura Mazda, the originator of all that is good, and who alone is praiseworthy. These divine revelations together with others from subsequent visits to heaven are collected in the main sacred text known as the "Avesta." This is a highly ethical religion from which the other world religions could learn, and in particular from its treatment of women. 
     Jesus' soteriology, or doctrine of salvation, and his eschatology, or doctrine of last things were taught by Zoroaster hundreds of years before Jesus' appearance. Zoroaster taught that humans are responsible for their salvation because they are free to choose between right and wrong, and light and dark. Hence, they can be held accountable for their actions, utterances, and thoughts. In particular the following influenced Jesus' teachings:
  • Zoroaster's God, Ahura Mazda, made known that he had an opponent, Aura Mainyu, the spirit and promoter of evil (Satan, the devil, demons).
  • Thus, there was a battle between good and evil in this world.
  • And Zoroaster was instructed to invite all of humanity to choose between good (Ahura Mazda) and evil (Aura Mainyu).
  • Zoroaster envisioned a nation and finally a world united in the worship of Ahura Mazda.
  • There will be a "Messianic Age" when the Messiah will come and bring peace and prosperity to the earth (Jesus' second coming).
  • Humans have a body and a separate soul. The body vanishes, at least temporarily, upon death. The soul, however, is immortal.
  • Also, there will a divine judgments of the soul immediately after death. There will be a heavenly journey for those souls found worthy and all other will descent into hell.
  • And there will be another final judgment of all of humanity after a general resurrection.
B. Reformed Christianity and the Esoteric Jesus
 
6. Paulinization Makes Faith Palatable to Gentiles and the Powerful
7. Hellenization Reforms the Faith and Deifies Jesus
8. Key Events prior to the Christian 4th Century
6. Paulinization Makes Faith Palatable to Gentiles and the Powerful
Introduction--Christianity might have remained a purely Jewish sect had it not been for Paul of Tarsus (ca. 10-67CE). Through his conversion of Christianity to his ideas, he made the faith palatable to non-Jews and the authorities; thus he made it "catholic," meaning, universal. Mainly through Paul, Christianity gave its followers a sense of community because it admitted all members of the community regardless of race, nationality, gender or social status. Men and women, slaves and nobles were attracted because unlike other religions in the Roman Empire, e.g., Judaism, Mithraism, etc., it welcomed all regardless of race or nationality.
     Mithraism at that time, for instance, had spread throughout the empire. It was a mystery religion that like Christianity owed much to Zoroastrianism. It had elaborate and moving rituals that included a form of baptism, a code of moral conduct, and the promise of life after death. However, it admitted only men to its fold.
     Paul's universalizing and intensive evangelizing made him thru Christianity one of the most influential persons in world history. But as we shall see, he was also a most opportunistic and dubious character who strongly believed that might makes right and that the ends justify the means. Paul's ideology was a recipe for success for the nascent religion. More than anybody else, including Jesus, he was responsible for the rapid growth of the faith and the shaping of the final doctrines of the New Testament. Fourteen of the twenty-seven chapters (called books) are claimed to be written by Paul. Hence, today's Christianity should be more appropriately named Paulism.
     According to his own words, Paul started out as Saul, a Jew who came to Jerusalem to be trained in philosophy and Judaism of the Pharisee variety. Jesus, however, had condemned the Pharisees as sons of the devil for their hypocrisy and lying (John 8:44). Initially, he persecuted Christians and the Jerusalem Church as a "hit man" or "serial killer" for the Pharisees, an exclusive Jewish sect of which he was a dedicated member (Acts 26:50). He would seek out Jesus' followers and then provoke the crowds into stoning them to death.
     However, one day on the road to Damascus to do his gruesome work "with authority and commission from the chief priests" (Acts 26:12), he appointed himself as an apostle on the authority of a vision in which Jesus appeared. But not even Paul seems to know what actually happened, for he gives us three different narrations depending on the specific audience (Acts 9:3-7; Acts 22:6-10; and Acts 26:12-20). In the third version, Jesus tells him to convert the Gentiles:
Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom I send thee, To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me (Acts 26:17-18). 
     From this day forward, for the next 30 years (ca.37-67 CE), Paul believed intensely in himself as the supremely commissioned teacher, who had received his command from the divine Jesus Himself. He would sacrifice the rest of his life, seeking no earthly advantage for himself, as Christianity's most zealous missionary. To further his objectives, he was quite willing to adapt his message to various circumstances and audiences. He does this regardless of the fact that Jesus and other prophets before him have condemned lying, deceit, and hypocrisy (see the Jesus quote above). And Peter tells us:
For he that will love life, and see good days, let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that speak no guile (I Peter 3:12, my emphasis)
     But Paul is proud of his opportunism and boasts of his guile (slyness, cunning, deceit, treachery, and trickery). Here is an instance of his expediency:
And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law; To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without the law. To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some (I Corinthians 9:20-22, my emphasis).
In opposition to Peter above he boasts:
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile (II Corinthians 12:16, my emphasis)
And after he was laughed out of Athens by her philosophers on account of his stories about Jesus' resurrection and the imminent end of the world, Paul warned the world about the dangers of philosophy:
 
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ (Colossians 2:8). 
 
Paulinization Makes the Faith Palatable to the Gentiles
Early on Paul realized that Jesus' message or good news, as later stated in the Synoptic Gospels, universally applied to all of humanity. So, he decided to convert all. However, there were two major obstacles. On the one hand, the Jews could not accept much of what Jesus' had taught:
  • The Jews knew nothing of the doctrine of last things such as heaven and hell, rewards and punishment, judgment after death.
  • The doctrine of the Eucharist, the eating of the flesh and drinking the blood of God.
  • The doctrine of God having a son born by a Virgin degraded God into a vulgar and polytheistic concept.
  • The universalism of Jesus would destroy the Judaism of the exclusively chosen people.
  • To the Jews Jesus was a disappointment, for they believed that the promised messiah of the scriptures would perform deeds of great political and military bravery.
  • To the Jews Jesus was a blasphemer because he repudiated the Sabbath, the Temple sacrifices, and other rituals.
On the other hand, the Gentiles, who as part of Christianity would also have to accept parts of Judaism, had problems with the legalistic practices of Judaism, the preferential status of Jews, etc., including:
  • circumcision of foreskin
  • avoidance of certain meats
  • blood sacrifice rituals
  • The doctrine that they would be governed by a kingdom in Palestine.
  • The doctrine that the Jews, being the chosen ones, would get preferential treatment.
  • The Virgin Birth and Jesus' descent from Jewish royalty.
  • The Last Supper as to close to the Jewish Passover. 
and both, the Jews and the Gentiles had problems with certain teachings of Jesus:
  • The rejection of mother and family as well as love between children and parents.
  • The rejection of marriage and private property.
  • The mandate that those who could not practice celibacy without desire should commit self-castration.
  • The ethical teachings that required all persons with property to sell it and give the money to the poor.
  • The condemnation of enjoying any comfort or luxury not equally enjoyed by all, actually making it a cardinal sin.
     Faced with these obstacles, Paul concluded that a compromise with the Jews would at best yield a temporary Jewish sect. Breaking with Judaism, however, would remove the majority of objections the Gentiles had. Furthermore, it would open the door for a universal, permanent religion for all of humanity. Henceforth, and grounded in the doctrine of justification by faith alone, he taught that the Jewish Law and the Gospel of Jesus were not simply contradictory but mutually exclusive.
     The doctrine of justification by faith alone was Paul's insight, and it would become his guiding ideal, motivating force, and major instrument to break with Judaism. And just as it would mean the same to Martin Luther and become his major justification and tool to break
 from the monopoly of Roman Catholicism fifteen centuries later. This doctrine makes salvation possible exclusively through a simple act of faith rather than burdensome good works, moral action, observances, and rituals. Paul, in his letter to the Romans, first leads up to the doctrine when he confesses:
For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to everyone who believeth . . . (Romans 1:16).
And he claims:
For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith (Romans 1:17).
The reasoning behind this doctrine is as follows:
1. God alone is perfectly righteous, and He will only save the perfectly righteous.
2. Humans, on grounds of their natural imperfections, sinfulness, etc., and   regardless of perfect moral action, good works, etc., can never achieve   perfect righteousness--it is a hopeless undertaking.
3. The only perfectly righteous human ever was the incarnate God Jesus who was fully God and fully human at the same time (!).
4. However, God accepts the perfect righteousness of the incarnate Jesus. Also, God offers us his grace or good will, meaning, the unmerited love and favor He has toward humanity. Therefore, by his grace, he will accept as perfectly righteous all those who have faith in the perfectly righteousness of Jesus who is thus the savior of all who believe in him.
                                                                                                            
Conclusion: If the above premises are true, then perfect righteousness before
                God is justified by faith alone.
     Perhaps it was on the strength of an argument like this, together with his conviction of an imminent end, that Paul justified his dubious method of evangelizing. His boastful claim to use guile, that is, slyness, cunning, craftiness, deception, dishonesty, and trickery, was for the to be converted own good. They were deceived, but they were also saved through their intangible expression of faith alone.   
   
Paulinization Makes the Faith Palatable to Those in Power
The key to establishing religious obedience, that is, absolute and unquestioning submissiveness to religious and secular authorities, like the Christian Church and the Roman Empire, is Paul's demand in the New Testament:
Let every soul be subject unto higher powers. For there is no power but that of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God; and they that resisteth shall receive to themselves damnation (Romans 13:1-2).
     This is of course a most unethical demand since it does not distinguish between moral and immoral powers. It was a dream come true for all religious and worldly dictators, despots, tyrants, absolute monarchs, and authoritarians.
     Sadly, it was part of a 180 degree turnaround of the founders teachings as seen from the perspective of the Roman Empire. Executed as a foe, his religion would now be a friend, a strong supporter, a foundation of the empire and soon to be the Holy Roman Empire. From now on the throne and the alter would cooperate in controlling the multitude and allocating who owns what. The human mind would be owned and controlled by the church, and the fruits of labor would be owned and controlled by the king.
7.  Hellenization Reforms the Faith and Deifies Jesus
Hellenization Reforms the Faith  
This reform had started with Paul (see above) but was completed and enshrined in a new gospel, the fourth and last gospel, which was written by an unknown author or authors in stages between ca. 90-120 CE and later assigned the name John.
The Gospel of John became the pragmatic foundation, then and now, for the enduring, Gentile, worldly,  institutionalized, universal Church.
The rapid growth of Christianity exposed it soon to the gentile, non-Jewish, world. But much that was written in the Synoptic Gospels was unacceptable or even repugnant to the new and potential converts. This world was Hellenized, that is, strongly influenced by Greek culture. Also, by the 90s CE, the hope for an imminent second coming of Jesus had vanished. Moreover, a variety of sects had evolved who had heretical interpretations of said gospels. Hence, there was an urgency to correct the faith.
     By the beginning of the 90s CE, however, written accounts of the Synoptic Gospels had already been widely dispersed. It was not possible, or at least impractical, to recall and alter these texts according to need. Therefore, a fourth gospel was needed to nullify, neutralize, counteract or reverse the unacceptable in these writings. The Gospel of John does all this. In addition, it satisfies or accommodate the intellectual desires of the gentile population for the Logos (see "The Nature of Jesus" below).
     Here are the main objections to the Synoptic Gospels by the Greek world:
  • The doctrine that they would be governed by a kingdom in Palestine.
  • The doctrine that the Jews, being the chosen ones, would get preferential treatment.
  • The Virgin Birth and Jesus' descent from Jewish royalty.
  • The rejection of mother and family as well as love between children and parents.
  • The rejection of marriage and private property
  • The preaching of an imminent, apocalyptic end of the world.
  • The Last Supper as to close to the Jewish Passover.
  • The Last Judgment, hell, and torture after death. 
  • The teachings of Paul that Christianity is for the ignorant, not the wise or learned (I Corinthian 1:18-2:16) and that Christians are not interested in the seen, but the unseen (II Corinthian 4:18).
Hellenization Deifies Jesus
The nature or essence of Jesus exalted or deified as God is found in the Gospel of John. It is different from the synoptic account because the essence of Jesus is defined with a new concept or doctrine, namely, that of the Logos as explained below. The Logos as a doctrine is esoteric, meaning, it is beyond the understanding or knowledge of most people on account that it is highly abstract, most complex, and intellectually very demanding. Moreover, it may have been intended for, or understood by, only a chosen few, as an inner group of disciples or initiates. Hence, at its core, Christianity may be an esoteric religion.
     The Greek Logos could have been translated with reason, but the term "Word" was chosen. However, it makes more sense when we substitute the term "reason" for "word" when reading these passages. As noted above, it was originally written to make the faith palatable to a philosophically oriented Hellenized (Greek-culture-oriented) world. John's gospel begins with:
"IN the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
And we are informed a little later "And the word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, . . . ." (John 1:14). This doctrine makes Jesus an incarnate supernatural principle. He is now on an all-embracing cosmic mission to redeem humanity. Moreover, the message is that Jesus, the Messiah of the Hebrew Scriptures, is now a full-blown God Himself. It follows that he is now so powerful as to keep his promise ". . . whosoever believeth in him [Jesus] should not perish, but have everlasting life" (John 3:16).
     Moreover, according to John:
  • Jesus is now: "the only begotten son of God" (3:18)
who proclaims:
  • "I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life." (8:12)
  •  "I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me." (8:42)
  • "Before Abraham, was I am" (8:58)
  • I and my Father are one" (10:30)
The following two paragraphs should give the reader a notion of what the doctrine of the Logos entails or means:
1. The Logos was first introduced to Western philosophy by Heraclitus (ca. 540-ca. 470 BCE), a Greek philosopher, as meaning the fundamental order of the cosmos. By the time of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle (ca. 470 BCE-322 BCE), the logos described the faculty of human reason and the knowledge humanity had of each other and the universe. Also, as of this period, the Stoics would understand the Logos as the animating force of the universe. However, they all believed (as Kant later 1724-1804 CE) that the concept of God was beyond human understanding and all attempts to describe Him would be unsuccessful.
2. After Judaism came under Hellenistic influence, Philo of Alexandria (30 BCE-45 BCE) set out to bridge the gap between understanding the anthropomorphized (personified) Yahweh of the Hebrew Scriptures with the unknowable God of the Greeks. Philo suggested that God is of a singular essence (ousia), namely, the Logos of an unknowable energy (energeiai) that was the very thought of God. However, this energy, the very thought of God, could interact with the lives of people though the essence itself was beyond what humans could grasp. Hence, the Logos became a go-between God's and human's thought. This made it possible to actualize the energy of God, and thus, by extension, to get a glimpse of the otherwise impossible to grasp the essence of God himself.
 
8.  Key Events prior to the Christian 4th Century
ca. 33 CE A new religious movement is sparked by Jesus of Nazareth after 1-3 years of preaching the imminent end of the world and a way to save one's immortal soul. However, Jesus of Nazareth is crucified as an enemy of the Roman Empire.
ca. 33-65 CE is a period of oral tradition. Not hindered by a rigid text, the life and teachings of Jesus are glorified with fabulous events from pagan and religious mythologies. While Jesus before his death was just another itinerant religious teacher, wonderworker, and exorcist, he emerges now as a divine figure that includes the best life events, miracles, and teachings of much older but often still competitive myths and religions. Thus, although there was no great event during Jesus' life, his glorification after death, in particular his resurrection from the dead, would get the faith of the ground and make it exceedingly competitive.
ca. 37 CE On his way to Damascus to seek out and murder Christians, Saul of Tarsus has a vision of Jesus who converts and authorizes him to evangelize in His name. Saul changes his name to  Paul. He fundamentally changes the faith to make it palatable to authorities and the Gentiles whose main evangelist he would be for the next thirty years (see above).
ca. 90 to 120--The Gospel of John, like Paul's letters, makes the faith palatable to non-Jews. Moreover, he elevates or mystifies the nature of Jesus by describing him as the Logos (Word) who existed from the beginning as the only savior who is also God (see above).
ca. 120 to 313--Christians increase in numbers, but they are only about five percent of the population after almost three hundred years of existence. It would take a political victory before the faith could be imposed on all as the one and only state religion. Also, during this time, the first rudimentary Bible appears, but it is displaced later by Jerome's version (see below).
Religious Tolerance, in Spite of some Persecution, in the Empire Allows Christianity to Succeed.
Broadly speaking, and as the English historian E. Gibbon (1737-94) describes, the religious harmony of the ancient world on account with which the most different and even hostile nations embraced, or at least respected, each other's superstitions. And the Romans too practiced the maxims of universal toleration. They protected a superstition even if they despised it, for instance, what they called the Jewish superstition (Judaism).
      The Roman state clearly did not care to which one of a multitude of existing religions an individual belonged. Everybody was free to accept any kind of "salvation" or make up a mind-satisfying ultimate belief. The different sects had all sorts of buildings, temples and synagogues in which they worshipped. And as long as they practiced the rule "live and let live," that is, not fight with each other, they were left alone.
     This changed, however, when the Christian communities started to refuse any kind of tolerance. Christians rejected the Roman gods, and henotheists who believed in or worship of one god without denying the existence of others, rejected the exclusivity of Christian monotheism, the belief that there is only one god. Christians declared that their God alone was the true creator and ruler of all there is, and that all other gods were imposters devised by the devil to mislead humanity. This intolerance caused strive with other sects. The situation got even worse when one of the Christian sects, now known as Roman Catholicism, claimed that they alone had the true interpretation of Christianity. So, now we had even conflicts between Christian sects.
     Already in the first century Christianity was persecuted because it was considered a "deadly superstition" as the Roman historian Publius Cornelius Tacitus (56-117 CE) named it. Then after a period of tolerance and promotion by the state, in the late Roman empire, atheism--a capital crime--was a common legal prosecution against Christians by henotheists.
 
C. Institutionalized Christianity & the Monopolized Jesus
                     "These two halves of god, the pope and the emperor"
                                                                                     Victor Hugo (1802-85)
 
9.  The Institutionalization and Imposition of Christianity
10. Political Victory Paves the Way for the Practices of Brahmanism
11. The Emerging Papacy and Its Claim to Own Jesus' Church
12. The Papacy's High Point under Boniface the "Freethinker"
 
 
Introduction--The 4th century was the key period in the establishment of an institutionalized Christianity and the Roman Catholic Church. By the end of this era, the new religion had triumphed over all competing pagan religions. Even rival Christian versions were eliminated or driven underground. It was now the only state religion of the Roman Empire. All other were persecuted, and their houses of worship were destroyed or turned into churches. Moreover, the Greco-Roman culture would soon be destroyed together with people's freedom to express their thoughts freely. The dark Middle Ages were at hand. The fresco below celebrates the victory of Christianity over all other cultures.
Triumph of the Cross over the now reduced to rubble pagan cultures and religions. Not only the Greek and Roman but also the cultures of Europe, the Americas, and other colonized countries where destroyed. Fresco Sala di Costantino, Vatican Palace By Tommaso Laureti (1585). (Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
9.  The Institutionalization and Imposition of Christianity
Key Events 4th Century to the End of the Western Roman Empire
Prior to 313 CE, Emperor Constantine I (reign 306-337), now also known as Saint Constantine or Constantine the Great, forms a favorable view of Christianity possibly under the influence of his mother who was a Christian convert.
313--In the edict of Milan, Constantine puts an end to institutionalized discrimination, persecution, and sometimes execution of Christians in the Roman Empire. However, as noted above, the Roman Empire was very tolerant of all religions when compared with the intolerance of of the Roman Catholic Church in the later Holy Roman Empire. For instance, in the year 1349, in more than 350 towns in Germany all Jews were murdered, that is, mostly burned alive. In this one year more Jews were killed than Christians in 200 years of ancient Roman persecution of Christians (K. Deschner, p.42, in Opus Diaboli, Reinbek, 1987).
ca. 314--In search for an empire-unifying state religion, because their was strive between various religions and even between the sects of Christianity, the emperor started to favor the Bishop of Rome and his version of Christianity. Over the next few years, Constantine made the firm decision that it would be necessary for the empire to have just one religion, namely, Christianity as mainly selected, altered, and expounded by the Bishop of Rome. Thus, the Bishop of Rome gained incalculably in wealth and power. He literally moved from rags to riches. That is, he emerged from the catacombs to settle in a palace, and he traded his rags for the fancy garments of pagan priests. Moreover, at this point, church offices, including the highest one, became of interest to leading Roman families.
     Soon after the Bishop of Rome becomes the emperor's conscience. He tells Constantine that all his sins would be forgiven if he would convert to Christianity. Constantine, however, decides to do his sinning first, like having his wife and son murdered, and is baptized only on his death bed many years later on May 22, 337.
ca. 320--Buddhism's monastic system is gradually implemented.
325 The Council of Nicaea (in today's Turkey).
  • The Council of Nicaea was historically significant because it was the first effort to attain a general agreement in the church through a meeting representing all of Christianity collectively.
  • The Emperor Constantine I, an unbaptized novice, convened and presided over the council. It was to address civil unrest causing dogmatic controversy in the Church and in particular Arianism. Arius, an Alexandrian presbyter taught that Jesus, since he was mutable, could not be truly divine because God and the Godhead (the godhood, the Trinity) are unique and alone are self-existent and immutable. Hence, there was a need to decide on the nature once and for all.
  • Arius' supporter vastly outnumbered the supporters of Constantine's idea, actually the Roman pope's idea. So, Constantine lost the first vote when only a minority supported him. However, Constantine's faction excommunicated Arius, and the emperor's guard expelled all of Arius' supporters from the council. Constantine's scheme was presented once more, and this time it won unanimous approval.
  • The result was that Arianism was condemned as a heresy and the doctrine that the Son is of one substance with the Father was voted in. This doctrine is now known as the Nicaean Creed, and it made the Son absolutely equal with the Father. This council and its creed is recognized by eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics.
  • Finally, interdictions were passed prohibiting self-castration and the presence of young women in the home of clerics. In conclusion, Constantine again informed the council how opposed he was to dogmatic controversy; he wanted the Church to peacefully coexist with each other and the empire.
The original Nicaean Creed (accepted by most Christian denominations):

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of all things visible and invisible.

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten of the Father [the only-begotten; that is, of the essence of the Father, God of God], Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father;

by whom all things were made [both in heaven and on earth];

who for us men, and for our salvation, came down and was incarnate and was made man;

he suffered, and the third day he rose again, ascended into heaven;

from thence he shall come to judge the quick [alive] and the dead.

And in the Holy Ghost.

[But those who say: 'There was a time when he was not;' and 'He was not before he was made;' and 'He was made out of nothing,' or 'He is of another substance' or 'essence,' or 'The Son of God is created,' or 'changeable,' or 'alterable' — they are condemned by the holy catholic and apostolic Church.]

374--Justification for the Church's Autonomy by Ambrose (339-397) the bishop of Milan. Because Milan was the administrative capital of the Western empire, Ambrose was in the right place at the right time to influence the empire's politics. Before the Imperial Court he "showed a directness that combined the republican ideal of the prerogatives of a Roman senator with a sinister vein of demagoguery.
     Ambrose was able to initiate a model of church-state relations that would last to the end of the Middle Ages (to ca. 1,500). When in 384 the pagan members of the Roman Senate appealed for tolerance, he secured a rejection of their petition.
     Although he was neither a Christian nor did he have any theological training when offered the office of Bishop of Milan, he nevertheless accepted the position. Thereafter, and within a week, he was baptized, ordained, and duly installed as Milan's bishop.
380--Roman Catholic Christianity is now the state religion, and an edict (civil law) by Emperor Theodosius I. (reign 379-395) orders the persecution of heretics and threatens them with death. He is known for his vigorous suppression of paganism and competing versions of Christianity such as Arianism. Also, Theodosius established the creed of the Council of Nicaea (325) as the universal norm for the Christian faith.
381--The Council of Constantinople. Emperor Theodosius I (reign 379-395) summons the bishops of the Christian Church to repair the differences between the Eastern and Western Church on the basis of the Nicaean creed. From the beginning of his reign, and probably under the influence of Ambrose, Theodosius' religious policy reflected the conviction that the unity of the Empire unconditionally presupposed unity of faith. Moreover, to Theodosius it was clear that this faith could be only the by now traditional (orthodox) Nicaean creed.
     In addition, the council clarified the mysterious third person of the Trinity, the Holy Ghost. It defined this phenomenon as though equal with to the Father, 'proceeded from Him, whereas the Son was 'begotten' of Him.
384--Unification of the creed by Jerome (ca. 340-ca. 420) is made possible when he translates the Greek Bible into Latin and edits it. This version becomes commonly accepted in the West after ca. 550 when all its separate books are bound into a single volume. Moreover, it almost immediately facilitates wide agreement in the Greek East and the Latin West based on the canon of the twenty-seven books of the New Testament.
     Also, he held classes for noble Roman widows and virgins like the widow Paula and her virgin daughters. As the researcher Joseph McCabe reports: "He emphatically describes his group of pupils as a small oasis of virtue in a great dessert of vice. Priests and laity, men and women, he describes as sordid, greedy, unchaste, and utterly irreligious. He actually forbids his virtues young ladies ever to remain in a room with a Roman priest."
     However, his relentless criticism of the Roman clergy, lax monks, and hypocritical virgins resulted in allegations by the Roman clergy that he had improper relations with the widow Paula. In bitter indignation he left in the company of virgins led by Paula for the Holy Land where he lived until his death.
391 to 395--The alliance of throne and altar was complete when Christianity had become the state religion of Rome under the reign  of the Emperor Theodosius I (379-395). Prohibited by law were all pagan rituals, including the Olympic Games, sacrifices, and visits to temples. Soon after, the reckoning of dates by Olympiads that had started in 776 BCE came to an end. Once Christianity was legalized, the Church took the same provinces for administration as the imperial government and called them dioceses.
     With the prestige, power, profit and privileges of a state religion came the obligation to support the state, that is, "interpret" the faith so that there would be no discord with the laws and actions of the state.
395--Justification for Bishop above King by Ambrose (339-397) bishop of Milan (see above). It is known as the concept of a Christian emperor as a dutiful son of the church “serving under orders from Christ,” and so subject to the advice and censures of his bishop.
396 to 430--Rationalization of the creed by Augustine (354-430) the Bishop of Hippo (an ancient city in N. Africa). He gives Christianity a philosophical justification and was probably the most significant Christian thinker after St. Paul. That is, he provided a most influential adaptation of a particular part of philosophy, the ancient Platonic tradition, with Christian ideas. Moreover, he developed doctrines of original sin, divine grace, divine sovereignty, the purgatory, and predestination. Augustine did all his sinning as a young man who then famously prayed "Grant me chastity and continence, but not yet."
     It was Neo-Platonism that guided Augustine. It is put forth as a philosophical system that originated in the 3rd century CE with Plotinus (ca. 205-ca. 270). It is based chiefly on Plato's (ca. 427-ca. 347 BCE) doctrine of the forms and the transmigration of souls. It is the idea that everything that exist is an imperfect copy of a perfect form that exists in a higher realm. Also, all existence consists of emanations from the One with whom the soul may be reunited. Augustine was perhaps the most important Christian thinker after Paul.
     It was the beginning of the end of Greek philosophy that Augustine had ushered in with his psychological rationalization. Within a few generations (ca. 550) the last school of philosophy in Athens would be closed, and all writings of the philosophers would be destroyed in Christendom; fortunately, however, they would be preserved in the Islamic world.  As W. T. Stance points out in his A Critical History of Greek Philosophy:
Plotinus's philosophy "is founded . . . upon the despair of reason." While "philosophy is upon reason. It is the effort to comprehend, to understand, to grasp the reality of things intellectually. Therefore, it cannot admit anything higher than reason. To exalt intuition, ecstasy, or rupture, above thought--this is the death of philosophy. . . . In Neo-Platonism, therefore, ancient philosophy commits suicide. This is the end. The place of philosophy is taken henceforth by religion."
By ca. 400--The Papacy had acquired considerable property around Rome. It was called the Inheritance or Patrimony of St. Peter. As of 755, these large estates would be ruled as the temporal and spiritual domain of the Papacy known as the republic of St. Peter or the Papal States.
451--The Council of Chalcedon (modern Kadikoy, Turkey), set forth the Chalcedonian Creed, which describes the "full humanity and full divinity" of Jesus as the second person of the Holy Trinity. Moreover, the ability to accuse a bishop of wrong doing was limited. Also, it was decided that an accuser of a bishop shall be suspect before the bishop.
476--Official end of the Western Roman Empire when the last emperor, Romulus Augustus, is removed by the German warrior Odoacer who would then become the first barbarian king of Italy.
ca. 476 to ca. 800--The Rapid and Complete Christianization of Europe.
  • The power vacuum that came with the official fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 is gradually filled by the bishop of Rome. He first declares himself as the bishop raised among equals, but soon demands that he be the only one with the title pope. Finally, he claims that the bishop of Rome is above kings.
  • The Papacy assumes the right to crown emperors. This gave the popes enormous leverage with future rulers who wanted the crown to have the Roman Catholic version of Christianity imposed on the whole of Europe.
  • Using the top down approach, a succession of European emperors were persuaded to  impose the new faith on their subjects. Moreover, the emperors soon appreciated that once the people of a region were converted, they became obedient, if not docile, subjects. These folks could now be controlled by a few dozen priests rather than a regiment of soldiers that had to be paid and were themselves a potential thread to the emperor's power. 
  • The Roman missionaries' carrot-and-stick strategy worked wonders with the unsophisticated Teutonic and Frankish people who still had a great admiration for the wisdom associated with the ancient city of Rome. Hence, they assumed that these missionaries probably spoke the truth when they offered the rewards of a glorious eternal life for converts and contrasted it with the eternal torment that unrepentant pagans could expect. Again, a few dozen monks could peacefully convert the many that would otherwise have required the bloody work of legions.
  • However, it took the military campaigns of Charlemagne to complete the conversion of the empire by 782. There were alone 18 campaigns against the Saxons in which many thousand who refused the new religion were executed (also see Charlemagne below).
10. Political Victory Paves the Way for the Practices of Brahmanism
As we have seen, the 4th century was the Christian century. The new religion had become the conscience of the emperors as well as their instrument to unite the empire and control the masses. The Christian religion that had pleaded for tolerance at the beginning of the century had by the end of the century triumphed over all other religions and annihilated them with the help of the emperors. This largely political victory would allow the Church to expand its sphere of influence into the secular domain and with the objective to eventually dominate it. Hence, the Church needed an ideology to accomplish this.
     And since the life events and ethics of the Buddha, which are close to that of Hinduism's Krishna, had worked so well to evangelize Christianity, why not look to the east for an ideology that could bring about a priest state or a theocracy as we call it now. However, Buddhism would not do because it was largely a monastic system. But the parent of Buddhism, Hinduism, had already created an enduring and powerful priest state for many centuries. So, why not simply imitate them.
     By 1,500 BCE, the priests of the lighter-skinned Indo-Aryan invaders of India had already formulated the tenets of a religion that would keep everybody in their divinely assigned station of life. It just so happened that the conquered dark-skinned many, the "untouchables" now known as Dalits, would be at the bottom, actually below the bottom in the caste system. The lighter-skinned invaders would be above them, and the priests would be on the very top of this social hierarchy. Not brute force, but a religious ideology had created an enduring priest state controlled by Brahmins, meaning earthly gods, as the members of the priestly and highest Hindu caste are called.
     Apparently, the Christian Church felt now strong enough to fully adapt and practice this most successful system. First, in imitation of Hinduism's earthly gods, the bishop of Rome appointed himself as God's sole representative on earth. And as the researcher, Martin A. Larson, in his work The Story of Christian Origins (Village Press, 1977) concludes, the following practices were certainly derived from Brahmanism:
  • Trial by ordeal [an ancient method of trial in which the accused was exposed to physical dangers, from which he or she was supposed to be divinely protected if innocent] For example, hands were immersed into pots of boiling oil and water. If an evaluation a few days later showed little damage or healing the person was proven innocent. If severe damage or deterioration, the victim was declared guilty.
  • Use of excommunication
  • Prohibition against any conversation with heretics
  • Encouragement of pilgrimages to alters and shrines
  • Severe sanctions against remarriage of women
  • The recognition of degrees of legality in marriages
  • The bestowal of unprecedented honors upon ascetics who tortured their bodies and lived a life of bizarre or fantastic physical hardship
  • The requirement that an ascetic, upon joining a religious order, bestow all his wealth upon the official priesthood
  • The acceptance of certain precise and vivid descriptions of torments in hell
  • The interpretation of the revealed scriptures by the official hierarchy alone
  • The ultimate authority of tradition
  • The vows of obedience, poverty, and chastity
  • The immunity of the priesthood from taxation or civil duties
  • The claim on the part of the hierarchy to establish all juridical codes
  • The doctrine that it is the functions of kings to administer and enforce such codes
  • The use of confession and penance to expiate an intricate system of venal and mortal sins
  • The priestly monopoly over the training and education of youth
  • The denial of the sacred scriptures to the lower orders and the laity
  • The use of spells and incantations (white magic) to defeat enemies, to be successful in love, business, etc., exactly as in the Atharva-Veda  
Subsequently, the use of excommunication would force kings to their knees and into submission. The vivid descriptions of torments in hell would frighten children and torture people with fear in the final hours of their existence. In particular, the monopoly on education and the denial of the sacred scriptures to the laity and lower clergy would be used to keep educatable people uneducated, that is, in darkness guided by blind men.
11.  The Emerging Papacy and Its Claim to Own Jesus' Church
                      "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely"
As we have seen from the first four hundred years of the Church's history, there was no pope recognized as head of the Church. The bishop of Rome until the fifth or sixth century was just another head of one of the apostolic, meaning founded by an apostle, churches. He was called "Pope" only because then every bishop was called "Pope" (Latin papa, from Greek pappas, “father”). However, the influence of the Italian clergy, people like Ambrose and the bishops of Rome, was substantial on account of their proximity to the emperors and the empire's seat of power, Rome and Milan.
     And just like the administrative orders for the empire, religious policies were approved and regulated strictly for the benefit of the despotic emperors and their empire. They controlled everything, both religious doctrines and secular law. In fact, the emperors considered themselves as head of all religions including the Christian faith. It was them who convened the all-important Church Councils and presided over them. And finally, Christianity became the state religion by imperial decree.
    However, in the third century, around 254, the Roman bishop started to demand submission from all other bishops. These demands were backed up with a threat of excommunication. In response, the African bishops, for instance, convened to frame a reply of open and contemptuous defiance. It began with these resentfully mocking words quoted by Joseph M. McCabe (1867-1955):

We judge no man, and we cut off no man from communion for differing from us. None of us regards himself as the bishop of bishops, or seek by tyrannical threats to compel his colleagues to obey him (Big Blue Book No. B-27, Haldeman-Julius Co., n. d.).

It would take the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 before the Western part of Christianity could be coerced into obedience to the office of the Roman bishop. To this day, the Eastern part never submitted to the self-appointed authority of the papacy.
     The claim to supremacy over all other bishops by the bishop of Rome is based on one of the Gospels. In Matthew 16:18, Jesus is quoted as saying:
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock [petra] I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
This is followed immediately by giving the exclusive means to salvation and power over everything on earth to this Church. In Mathew 16:19 Jesus is allegedly saying:
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
But this play with Peter’s name was obviously a pious fraud not made by Jesus, as McCabe points out. For the word "church" had no meaning at all in the days of Jesus and Peter. Moreover, such a word did not exist in Aramaic, the language spoken by Christ. Most likely, this play with words was interpolated into the gospel by a follower of Peter and also possibly a member of the Roman Church to strengthen Peter’s position against Paul and that of the Roman bishop against all other boishops.
     Peter and Paul had started quarrelling, and Paul claimed he alone knows how to explain the gospel (1 Cor 4:14-16) while Peter warned that Paul’s writings are "hard to understand," and beware of those who "twist" the meanings of the scriptures, and being led away with the errors of the wicked (2 Peter 3:15-17).
     To this modern age, this alleged saying of Christ asserted in an age of deep ignorance is the keystone of the Roman Church’s claim to supremacy over all Christian churches. And McCabe, a former Catholic priest and professor of philosophy for the Church, concludes: "That crude little pun has changed the course of history and made the life-work of Christ a mockery."
12.  The Papacy's High Point under Boniface the "Freethinker"
With Pope Boniface VIII reign from 1294-1303, the doctrine of the supremacy of the pope reached its height. In 1301, he sent a Papal Bull to Philip IV, King of France,  in which he addressed him with "Listen, My Son," and informed him that "God has set popes over kings and kingdoms."
     In 1302 he followed up with another Papal Bull, Unam Sanctum, which many consider one of the most important papal documents of Catholic history. It proclaimed:
  • that it "is necessary for salvation that every living creature be under submission to the Roman pontiff."
  • that both spiritual and temporal (religious and secular) power were under the pope's jurisdiction.
  • that kings were subordinate to the power of the Roman Catholic Church.
In response, King Philip IV had Boniface VIII denounced as a heretical criminal to the French clergy. Boniface retaliated by excommunicating Philip in 1203. A little later in 1203, a party of horsemen by Philips chief minister, Nogaret, and a member of a Roman nobility hostile to Boniface, the Colonna family, captured Boniface at his retreat in Anagni. When Boniface refused to resign, he was badly beaten and nearly executed. Through the intervention of a third party, he was freed after three days. However, physically and mortally wounded, he died a month later in Rome.
     After this humiliating ordeal of Boniface and the papacy, no subsequent pope were to challenge or seriously threaten kings and emperors. Under the now emerging European nation states with their secular leaders, the Papacy's secular power would gradually and forever be lost. Moreover, with this loss of prestige came the freedom to expose and publicize the corruptions of the Papacy and in particular that of the "Bad Popes." This would eventually spark the Reformation in the 16th century.
     However, Philip IV was not yet finished with his arch enemy Boniface VIII. Almost immediately, he demanded from the new pope that Boniface be formally condemned as a heretic, his bones disinterred, incinerated, and the ashes scattered to the winds. A judicial investigation against Boniface was held from 1303 to 1311 when it was closed without any decisions.
     What Boniface was accused to have said, would make him, or his accuser, a freethinker who anticipated the 18th century Age of Enlightenment:
  • The Christian religion is a human invention like the faith of the Jews and the Arabs;
  • The dead will rise just as little as my horse which died yesterday;
  • Mary, when she bore Christ, was just as little a virgin as my own mother when she gave birth to me;
  • Sex and the satisfaction of natural drives is as little a sin as hand washing;
  • Paradise and hell only exist on earth; the healthy, rich and happy people live in the earthly paradise, the poor and the sick are in the earthly hell;
  • The world will exist forever, only we do not;
  • Any religion and especially Christianity does not only contain some truth, but also many errors. The long list of Christian untruth includes trinity, the virgin birth, the godly nature of Jesus, the eucharistic transformation of bread and wine into the body of Christ and the resurrection of the dead.
The world would have to wait over 400 years before another Roman Catholic Priest, Jean Meslier (1664-1729) of Etrepigni (near Reims), France would express like observations or judgments. He did so in his "Last Will and Testament" released after his death since he "did not want to burn." The text was discovered and publicized by Voltaire (1694-1778). Meslier's work is scientifically and logically argued, which is a remarkable accomplishment by a village priest and for its time.
 
 
D. Actualized Christianity--Pernicious Pursuits in the Name of Jesus
 How do you dare, Bishop who holds the place of the Apostle, school your people in war.
                                                                    Erasmus (1469-1536)
 
13. The Growth and Corruption of the Papacy (6th-17th cent.)
14. The Persecution and Massacres of Jews
15. The Crusades Against Moslems, Pagans, and Other Christians
16. The Inquisition
17. The Witchcraft Trials (1330-1700)
18. The Reformation and Counter-Reformation
19. The Peasant's Revolt, Luther's Betrayal and Slave Morality
 
13. The Growth and Corruption of the Papacy (6th-19th cent.)

ca. 500 to 751--The profitable alliance of altar and throne continues.

This time the Church is closely associated with the Merovingian Dynasty which was the Frankish line of kings who reigned in Gaul (ancient France) during this period. The line was founded by King Clovis I (reign 481-511), and it filled the vacuum that was left in Europe with the fall of the Western Roman Empire. The clerics were of tremendous help in expanding the empire when they pacified the conquered and managed large landed estates.
      By the end of this time span, the monasteries had become powerful forces in terms of wealth and influence. The wealth was made possible from managing, that is, farming donated lands that came with cheap serf labor thus yielding substantial profits. The monks influence over the population of surrounding areas came from their apparently exemplary lives, their religious teachings, their coercive carrot (heaven) and stick (hell) approach, their show of relics and rituals that had a magical appeal and attracted pilgrims in droves from near and afar.

     The abbots who run these religious enterprises were thus rich and powerful magnates who served the king well by maintaining order, controlling the folks, and keeping them in awe of: God, His representative on earth, the pope, and His divinely ordained king. Moreover, from the beginning, the Merovingian kings had employed the higher clergy cooperatively with counts (earls) as royal agents.

ca. 750--The Donation of Constantine, a powerful forgery.
This counterfeit document is the best known and most important forgery of the Middle Ages. It was created by a cleric of the Lateran probably with the knowledge of Pope Stephen II (reign 752-757).  It appears to record that the Roman emperor Constantine I (reign 312-337) bequeathed large territories as well as enormous spiritual and temporal powers on Pope Sylvester I (reign 314-335) and his successors.
     First, the document claims, Constantine converts to Christianity because Sylvester I had miraculously cured him of leprosy. The emperor, though preparing to leave town for his new capital of Constantinople, proclaims the importance of Rome to the church because it is the city of the apostles Peter and Paul. This is followed by the emperor granting the pope and his successors:
  • The emperor guarantees the security of Rome as property of the Roman Catholic Church [When Pope Stephen II (reign 752-757) showed this document to the illiterate Pippin III, King of the Franks, the king was impressed and granted the wished for security].
  • Supremacy over all other apostolic churches such as that of Constantinople, Jerusalem, etc., and all the world's churches;
  • Administrative rights over estates awarded to churches throughout the empire;
  • Control of all the regions of the Western Empire, thus, implying the right to appoint all rulers in the West.
This fabrication was used by the popes in particular from the 11th-century onward in their struggle with secular rulers and the emperors of the Holy Roman Empire that was actually neither Holy nor Roman. This fraud was exposed by Lorenzo Valla in a 1517 book "Declamatio" exposing that the crude Latin of the text could not possibly have dated from the time of Constantine I.
 
768 to 814--Charlemagne completes unification and Christianization of Europe
Charlemagne's rise to power: At the time of his birth in ca. 742, his father, Pippin III the Short, had succeeded his father as the mayor of the palace (a kind of prime minister) serving the Merovingian king. Pippin, not the king, actually was the effective power over the Frankish kingdom. When Pippin informed the pope about the situation, he was told that the "power in the state belonged to him who was actually possessed of it." This was just what Pippin wanted to hear.
     In a "peaceful" coup, Pippin deposed King Childeric III in 751, and confined him in a monastery. This was the beginning of the Carolingian dynasty. The event became official when Pippin launched an elaborate coronation service in which Boniface, the famous missionary of north-western Europe, anointed him as "King by the grace of God."
     When Pippin III died in 768, his land was divided between Charlemagne and his brother Carloman. The rivalry between the two came to an end when Carloman died in 771. Charlemagne, then, simply disregarded the rights of Carloman's legal successors and took control of the entire Frankish realm. Under his reign, the alliance of throne and altar that had started with the Merovingian Dynasty (see above) was continued and expanded. 
A portrait of Charlemagne by Albrecht Dürer (1471-1528) that was painted several centuries after his death. He wears the crown of the Holy Roman Empire and unites, holds in his hands, both secular and ecclesiastical power. The small globe with the cross on top is by itself also a symbol of royal power. The three lilies, top right, are the symbol of Frankish Royalty. The eagle, top left, represents the military standard of the Roman Empire.
(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
Charlemagne unifies and Christianizes Europe:
  • His motivation to establish a Christian theocracy headed by himself, came in part from him being a true believer in Christianity. He was a devoted and frequent worshipper in the church, "going morning and evening, even after nightfall, besides attending mass." Throughout his life, he remained a devout Catholic who maintained a close relationship with the papacy. And as we shall see, Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) was later right when he observed that "Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction."
  • His first three decades in power were dominated by military campaigns. Historians count fifty-three operations or crusades conducted by himself or his officers against the Saxons, Lombards, Aquitanians, Thuringians, Bavarians, Avars or Huns, Danes, Slaves, Saracens, and Greeks. The ancient freedom and independence of the conquered had come to an end.
  • The Saxons, more than any other tribe, fiercely resisted the empires armies and the papacy's priests who worked together just as in earlier times. It was a thirty-two year struggle (772-804) to subdue the Saxons. It was marked by blundering, broken peace agreements, hostage taking, mass killings, deportation of ca. 10,000 rebellious Saxons families, and draconian measures to compel the acceptance of Christianity.
  • It was submission to Christianity or death. For instance, he had beheaded 4,500 prisoners in one day in Lower Saxony at Verden on the river Aller (782). They were decapitated for practicing their indigenous paganism after having officially, though under duress, converted to Christianity and undergone baptism. The river was reported to have been flowing red with their blood. Charlemagne's motives were to set an example of punishment for rebellion and demonstrate who has the power.
  • Charlemagne calls a series of synods to order and direct religious life. As a guarantor and major benefactor of the papacy, the papal states, and the rest of the Church, he was in a position to extend his authority over matters that were traditionally governed by the Church. The synods were made up of clerics and laymen who under Charlemagne's guidance formed decrees to correct deficiencies and improve Christianity. These orders were given the force of law which all royal office holders, but especially bishops, were expected to enforce. This reform movement was designed to:
  • improve the intellectual and moral quality of the clergy who were often "serf priests" appointed by the lords on whose the church stood. Not any better educated than their congregation, they would say Mass on Sundays and serve the land lord during the week.
  • protect and increase the resources of the Roman Church,
  • strengthen the Church's hierarchical structure, while clarifying the powers and responsibilities of its members,
  • intensifying pastoral care for the laity leading to an improvement of morals thru a better understanding the basic tenets of the faith,
  • teach the laity the virtues of humility, reverence, and submissiveness to the papacy and the empire, the two arms of God that governed the church and the world.
  • root out paganism,
  • place more authority with Charlemagne concerning: control over Church property, how to spread the faith, the definition of orthodox doctrine. 
Charlemagne generously shared with the clergy the estates and abundance of booty from the captured territories. Moreover, he endowed churches and built a magnificent  cathedral in which he was later buried. As one historian reports:
"His respect for the clergy culminated in his veneration for the bishop of Rome as the successor of St. Peter. 'He cherished the church of St. Peter the apostle at Rome above all other holy and sacred places, and filled its treasury with a vast wealth of gold, silver, and precious stones. He sent great and countless gifts to the popes; . . . .'"
     Moreover, he is said to have strongly promoted education in the empire. However, this furtherance was limited to priests, monasteries, and the aristocracy who guarded it carefully from the public.
Charlemagne's vices were not limited to sacrificing thousands of human beings to his grand ambitions and passion for conquest and booty. His private life was without moral self-restrained with regard to sexual activity. He had married five wives who he divorced at his pleasure. After the death of wife number five, he settled down with three or four concubines. Between his wives and concubines he had fathered at least 18 children. And as his biographer Eginhard, who lived on his court, reports: he encouraged his own daughters in dissolute habits rather than give them in marriage to princes who might become competitors for a share in the kingdom. And the historian Gibbon tells us about ". . . the long celibacy and licentious manners of his daughters, [of] whom the father was suspected of loving with too fond a passion."
"You do not bite the hand that feeds you" is a maxim well understood by the papacy and the clergy. This guardians of morality never rebuked Charlemagne for his brutal, murderous campaigns and sexual immorality. While later, less generous monarchs, e. g. Henry VIII, were condemned with an uncompromising fervor for the sanctity of marriage.
 
ca. 850--The False Decretals, a most influential set of forgeries.
A decretal is an official order or decree issued by a pope on some matter of ecclesiastical discipline, some point of doctrine, or church law.
The objective of the priestly forgers was to:
  • free the Roman Catholic church from intrusions by secular powers, e.g., the rulers or the state in any form,
  • bring back dormant privileges of the clergy,
  • free the ordinary bishops from encroachments by powerful metropolitan and archbishops,
  • revitalize the right of appeal to the pope who would then have more local power,
  • have forbidden, with the threat of eternal damnation, so much as to accuse a bishop of a crime or prosecute him,
  • choose their own judges if a trial is unavoidable, and
  • have a criminal procedure specified that was practically impossible to carry out.
Those last few points indicate that they wanted to be like God, the Pope and the Emperor, that is, not accountable to anyone here on earth.
To achieve their objective they assembled a large number of real and fabricated documents pertaining to positive legislation passed by popes and emperors long dead. After about a century, they were accepted as authentic by the experts in canon law, theologians, and councils. It was not until 1628 that David Blondel, a Reformed theologian, refuted the documents by demonstrating that the alleged popes from the first centuries had extensively quoted from writers of a much later time.
The False Decretals were a godsend for the Pope who used them in the 'Investiture Controversy' which was about who had the right to 'invest' - that is confer authority upon- a bishop in his diocese that included often large estates. Hence, it concerned the sharing of power and wealth within the ruling classes who supplied the personnel for both imperial and ecclesiastical administration in the Holy Roman Empire. The False Decretals were the proof for the close interaction of Pope and bishops. Overwhelmed by the evidence, the Emperor yielded this right to the Pope. However, it turned the forging bishop's objective on its head. They had thought independence from powerful metropolitan and archbishops but ended up under close control of, and dependency on, the Bishop of Rome.
 
962--The beginning of the "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation."
In 870 the Frankish Kingdom is divided into France and Germany. Charles the Bold, a grandson of Charlemagne, received the western half that contained the old Roman province named Gaul. By then, French had already developed out of the vulgar Latin of the Roman occupiers. Thus, this Germanic land would strangely speak a Latin mother tongue.
     The other grandson got the eastern part that had been named Germania by the Romans. Most of it had never been part of the old Roman empire. In one attempt to conquer it, three Roman legions (XVIII-IXX) were annihilated in the Teutoburger Forest in the year 9 CE. Hence, this part retained their Germanic language (s).
     By 973, Otto II King of Germany had consolidated the eastern part by military force and the use of the Church as an administrative and pacifying force. He was German king from 936-961 and emperor of the "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation" from 962-973.
    
9th to 17th century--The Papacy's corrupt centenaries
"The Papacy was corrupt for whole centuries: especially from about 880 to 1050 and (with a short decent pontificate at rare intervals) 1290 to 1660. No 'primacy' in any other organized religion has so disgraceful a record" observed Joseph McCabe, a former priest and professor of the Church.
     With the break up of Charlemagne's empire (reign 774-814), the Papacy soon lost the crucial support that had maintained it. Here one must remember that the Papacy had never stood on its own, that is, without the support of a central temporal power that in turn controlled it. Now that this support had vanished, ruthless Roman aristocratic families got hold of the seat of St. Peter and control it for power, profit, privilege, and prestige.
     They were able to maintain the Republic of Saint Peter, the Papal States, that had emerged around 850. However, this was accompanied with a serious decline of spiritual leadership as well as immoral and criminal activities of the vilest kind. Moreover, among the families there was a fierce competition for this lucrative office resulting in brutal battles and sale to the highest bidder. For instance, there were 24 popes in short intervals between 872 and 965. Pope Theodore II is a case in point. He reigned in December of 897 for 20 days.
     Cardinal J. H. Newman (1801-90) before his conversion to Catholicism writes about the beginning of this unscrupulous time in Essays Critical and Historical (1841). All quoted texts are from his work:
897--The Cadaver Trial of Pope Formosus (reign 891-896)
His posthumous trial is one of the most bizarre incidents in papal history. "At the close of the ninth century, Stephen VI. dragged the body of an obnoxious predecessor from the grave, and, after subjecting it to a mock trial [with him propped up on a throne and robed in purple, see picture below], cut off its head and three fingers, and threw it into the Tiber. He himself was subsequently deposed, and strangled in prison."
(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
898--The Pornocracy or Rule of the Harlots--"In the years that followed [Stephen VI], the power of electing to the popedom fell into the hands of the Counts of Tusculum and their relatives, for instance, the intriguing and licentious Theodora, and her equally unprincipled daughters, Theodora and Marozia. These women [though not prostitutes], members of a patrician family [the Theophylacti and their relatives], by their arts and beauty, obtained an unbounded influence over the aristocratic tyrants of the city."
904--It is widely believed that Marozia was the concubine of Pope Sergius III (reign 904-911) and the mother of Pope John XI (reign 931-935) with pope Sergius III allegedly the father. She was also accused of arranging the murder of Pope John X (914-928) (who had originally been nominated for office by one of the Theodora's) in order to secure the elevation of her current favorite as Pope Leo VI (reign 928-928).]
955-- "One of the Theodoras advanced a lover, and Marozia a son, to the popedom. The grandson of the latter, Octavian, succeeding to her power, as well as to the civil government of the city, elevated himself, on the death of the then Pope, to the apostolic chair, at the age of eighteen, under the title of John XII. (A.D. 956.)" [my emphases, see below]
955--A place of intense fear for pilgrims--under John XII (reign 955-964) ". . . 'The Lateran palace [the pope's residence],' says Mr. Bowden, 'was disgraced by becoming a receptacle for courtesans: and decent females were terrified from pilgrimages to the threshold of the Apostles by the reports which were spread abroad of the lawless impurity and violence of their representative and successor.' .  ."
962--the German king Otto I and his wife Adelaide are crowned as Holy Roman emperor and empress by the now 25 years old John XII. However, John refused when Otto ordered to take an oath of obedience to him. Subsequently, in 963, Otto ousted John for instigating an armed conspiracy against him and for dishonorable conduct.
     An account of the charges leveled against John XII from the writings of the Church Fathers (Patrologia Latina) include:
a. Benedict, cardinal deacon, with other co-deacons and priests, said they knew that he had been paid for ordaining bishops, specifically that he had ordained a ten-year-old bishop in the city of Todi...
b. They testified about his adultery, which they did not see with their own eyes, but nonetheless knew with certainty: he had fornicated with the widow of Rainier, with Stephana his father's concubine, with the widow Anna, and with his own niece [incest], and he made the sacred [Lateran] palace into a whorehouse.
c. They said that blinded his confessor Benedict, and thereafter Benedict had died; that he had that he had killed John, cardinal subdeacon, after castrating him;
d. All, clerics as well as laymen, declared that he had toasted to the devil with wine. They said when playing at dice, he invoked Jupiter, Venus and other demons. They even said he did not celebrate Matins [services between midnight and dawn] and the canonical hours nor did he make the sign of the cross.
In the end, John was replaced with Pope Leo VIII. But in February 964, after King Otto left, Leo was deposed by a synod conducted by John. Soon after, the 27 year old died suddenly. The manner of his death is not known, though it was rumored that he was killed by a jealous husband whose wife had been found accepting his sexual affections.
974--Robbing St. Peter--"Boniface VII. (reign June-July 974), in the space of a few weeks after his elevation, plundered the treasury and basilica of St. Peter of all he could conveniently carry off, and fled to Constantinople."
984--The return of the robber pope--In 984, Boniface VII 92nd reign 984-985) was called back by the powerful Crescentii family to replace Pope John XIV. Upon his return, he imprisoned John and presumably murdered him.
1004--Papal supremacy for sale--"John XVIII. (reign 1004-1009) expressed his readiness, for a sum of money from the Emperor Basil, to recognize the right of the Greek Patriarch to the title of ecumenical or universal bishop, and the consequent degradation of his own see; and was only prevented by the general indignation excited by the report of his intention."
1032--The boy pope--"Benedict IX. [1st reign 1032-1044] was consecrated Pope, according to some authorities, at the age of ten or twelve years, and became notorious for adulteries and murders. At length he resolved on marrying his first cousin; and, when her father would not assent except on the condition of his resigning the popedom, he sold it for a large sum, and consecrated the purchaser as his successor [Gregory VI, 1044-1046]."
     ". . .  in the words of St. Bruno, 'the world lay in wickedness, holiness had disappeared, justice had perished, and truth had been buried; Simon* Magus lording it over the Church, whose bishops and priests were given to luxury and fornication'."
*[Simon, according to the New Testament account in Acts of the Apostles 8:9–24, after becoming a Christian, offered to purchase from the Apostles Peter and John the supernatural power of transmitting the Holy Spirit, thus giving rise to the term simony meaning the buying or selling of sacred things or ecclesiastical office.]
1044--Gregory VI was now the reigning pope, as we have seen above. "He had lived free from the gross vices by which the clergy were too generally disgraced. . . . As to his traffic in holy things, . . . . he really does seem to have committed his act of simony with the very best intentions, which he did in fact carry out, so far as his bargain was made good to him. He had been known in the world as John Gratianus; and at the time of his promotion was arch-priest of Rome. 'He was considered,' says Mr. Bowden, 'in those bad times more than ordinarily religious; He is described as 'idiota et miræ simplicitatis [ignorant and of extraordinary simplicity],' and, what perhaps is included in this account of him, he was unlettered. . . . and  Gregory, however, after a time, seemed to preponderate over his antagonists [the boy pope had returned to reclaim the Papacy]; he maintained a body of troops, and with these he suppressed the suburban robbers who molested the pilgrims. Expelling them from the sacred limits of St. Peter's, he carried his arms further, till he had cleared the neighboring towns and roads of these marauders.
1045--With the return of the boy pope we have now three popes--"He [Gregory VI] could not be quite said to have come into actual possession of his purchase; for Benedict, his predecessor, who sold it to him, being disappointed in his intended bride, returned to Rome after an absence of three months [in 1045], and resumed his pontifical station, while the party of his intended father-in-law had had sufficient influence to create a Pope of their own, John, Bishop of Sabina, who paid a high price for his elevation, and took the title of Sylvester III. And thus there were three self-styled Popes at once in the Holy City, Benedict performing his sacred functions at the Lateran, Gregory at St. Peter's, and Sylvester at Santa Maria Maggiore."
1046--The boy pope's 3rd reign--Henry III, emperor of Germany, was disgusted with the multiple-pope situation and invoked the Council of Sutri in December of 1046. However none of the three popes was favored. 1. Sylvester was declared a false claimant and imprisoned. 2. Benedict was deposed, and 3. Gregory was charged with simony, deprived of the papacy, and replaced by the Saxon bishop Suidger of Bamberg as Clement II. After Clement's death in 1047, Benedict reappeared in Rome and installed himself once more. He was finally disposed in 1048 and the last of the popes from the powerful Theophylacti family.
1073--Pope Gregory VII (reign 1073-85) reforms and re-invents the Church. Like other popes before and after him, he was persuaded that:
  • The Church was founded by God alone and entrusted with the task of embracing all mankind in a single society in which divine will is the only law.
  • The Church, in her capacity as a divine institution, is supreme over all human structures, especially the this worldly, secular state.
  • The pope was not only the absolute head of the Church, but also the king of kings. Hence, a king's authority to rule was bestowed upon him by the pope and could also be removed by the pope. This gave him the power to dispose of emperors.
  • The pope, in his role as head of the Church, is the vice-regent of God on earth, so that disobedience to him implies disobedience to God: or, in other words, a defection from Christianity. it follows that the papal power was the sole universal power at least here on earth.
  • As God's sole representative on earth, the pope held the keys of heaven and hell. Hence, it was within the pope's authority to declare that through the doctrine of transubstantiation only the priest could perform the ritual of the Mass and could also determine whether a person would go to heaven or hell.
  • Celibacy should be compulsory among the clergy. This would yield four great benefits for the Church:
First, the properties acquired by bishops and priests could not become the property of their children because they had none. Children fathered by the clergy were, and are still, declared bastards and did not count. Earlier, ca. 1020, Pope Benedict VIII (reign 1012-1024) condemned the children of priests to be slaves. Hence, the Church inherited the properties of the clergy.
Second, lack of experience with family problems reduced the priest's understanding and sympathy for family life. Hence, to this day, priests support the withholding of the means for effective family planning.
Third, freed from family responsibilities, the priests could concentrate on the business of the Church.
Fourth, celibacy distanced priests from ordinary people and thus yielded greater respect for this profession.   
 
1229--It is reiterated that ownership of the Bible is prohibited. Cannon 14 from the council of Toulouse states that the Roman Catholic Church:
Forbids the laity to have in their possession any copy of the books of the Old and New testament . . . and most strictly forbids these works in the vulgar [common] tongue.
 
1233--Pope Gregory IX (reign 1227-41) founded the Inquisition in response to the growing popularity of different interpretations of Christianity considered heretical by the Church. The objective was to find and eliminate heresy before it could manifest itself. Courts set up to to judge the guilt of potential heretics were initially staffed by bishops, but later the job fell to Dominican and Franciscan monks.
ca. 1250-- Thomas Aquinas (1225-1275) is recognized and promoted by the Catholic and most Protestant churches as the West's foremost Christian philosopher and theologian. Although the writings of the Greek philosophers had been destroyed in Christendom, they had been saved in the Islamic world. Hence, through Islamic Spain, Aquinas obtained the writings of the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BCE) and reconciled, supported, or rationalized the Christian faith with it at least to his satisfaction.
     When theologizing, he avoided the concept of innate ideas from Platonism and the idea of illumination from Augustine. Instead, and that is his great accomplishment, he introduce Aristotelian philosophy into Christian theology. Following Aristotle, he postulated a cognitive faculty naturally capable of arriving at knowledge of the object in proportion to that faculty. Knowledge is acquired through two stages of operation, sensitive (the senses) and intellective (the mind), which are intimately related to one another. He concluded that the intellect does not attain any idea unless the material for that idea is presented to it by the senses: "Nihil est intellectu quod prius non fuerit in sensu."
     Moreover, this Dominican monk is famous for formulating and then evaluating the strongest arguments for and against the existence of God. He concludes that God actually exists. However, if he had concluded otherwise and not kept silent, he would have been burned at the stake like his Dominican brother Giordano Bruno (ca. 1548-1600, see below).
     Also, Aquinas developed and refined the teachings:
a. that the sacred doctrines, scriptures, etc. of the Church are the ultimate norm, for "whatsoever is found in the other sciences contrary to the truth of this science (e.g., sacred doctrines, etc.) must be condemned as false. This dogmatic demand shut the door to the correction of errors and progress on account of new knowledge and historical advance.
b. supporting slavery;
c. the death penalty for heretics;
d. of the purgatory as a place of punishment to purify souls before they can enter heaven;
e. of what there is to do in heaven, namely, the viewing of those who suffer in hell;
f. of superstition theory
g. that women were defective. Apparently, he took Aristotle's teaching to heart that women were 'incomplete' men, because they did not produce semen, which apparently contained a whole human being. Furthermore, he argued that rather than of value as people with their own aims and goals, women were only of instrumental value, that is, breeding and housework.
Note: Aquinas theological philosophy or philosophical theology is known as Thomism and further developed and taught in many of today's universities.
 
1316--"We have chosen as Pope the worst man who lived on earth" said one Cardinal when John XXII (reign 1316-1334) was elected. However, he was a financial genius who greatly increased the papal treasury with the bulls Execrabilis (1317) and Ex Debito (1319). These measures increased papal control over the distribution of church offices and over the fees paid by their recipients. In addition, he set new fees for 145 documents issued by the papal court. Moreover, he denounced the whole Franciscan theory of evangelical poverty in two decretals (letters): Ad Conditorem Canonum (1322) and Cum Inter Nonnullos (1323), asserting scriptural evidence to show that Christ and the Apostles had owned property. "He died at age 85, the richest man in Christendom" reports Oliver DeWerthern.
The conditions outlined above continued under the later Renaissance popes

1309 to 1377--The popes took up residence in Avignon, France primarily because of the current political turmoil at that time in Rome. In 1348, Avignon became direct papal property. The Avignon papacy was overwhelmingly French in complexion, that is, all seven of the popes during the period were French, as were 111 of the 134 cardinals created.

1378 to 1417--When there were two, and later three, rival popes during the Great Western Schism. It began with Urban VI (reign 1378-1379) in Rome and Clement VII (reign 1378-1394) in Avignon. Hence, there were:
1. two Sacred College of Cardinals;
2. two expensive Papal courts to maintain;
3. two sets of Papal legates swarming over Europe;
4. two appointees for every vacant church job; and
5. two levies of ecclesiastical taxes with the creation of many new     schemes to raise money for the two sets of expenses.

1409--A third pope emerged when the Council of Pisa attempted with a formal trial to solve the 30-year Schism. The two rival popes then in office, Roman Pope Gregory XII and Avignon Pope Benedict XIII, were removed from office as "notorious schismatics, notorious heretics, errant from the faith and guilty of perjury and violated oath. A new pope was elected, John XXIII, but both the Roman and the Avignon pope refused to recognize the right of the Council to dethrone them. Thus, instead of healing the split, there were now three popes. The three-pope situation lasted for five years.

1455--Pope Nicholas (reign 1447-55):

                 "Strengthens the faith of the weak by that which it sees."

His plans were to embellish the city with new monuments worthy of the capital of the Christian world. But the works on which he especially set his heart were the rebuilding of the Vatican, the Borgo district, and St Peter's Basilica where the reborn glories of the papacy were to be focused. He had ancient monuments such as the Colosseum looted for building materials. Under his drive, Rome became a centre for goldsmiths, silversmiths, tapestry makers, and other artisans and artists such as the great Florentine painter Fra Angelico (1387–1455). He justified these endeavors as follows:
To create solid and stable conviction there must be something that appeals to the eye. A faith sustained only by doctrine will never be anything but feeble and vacillating. . . If the authority of the Holy See were visibly displayed in majestic buildings. . . all the world would accept and revere it. Noble edifices combining taste and beauty with imposing proportions would immensely exalt the chair of St. Peter.
 
1510--Ends the disturbing papal election process when the Colonna and the Orsini families, and their baron peers sign an agreement to live in peace, that is, avoid confrontations in connection with the conclaves. This compromise was viewed as a great sacrifice, a giving up of vital influence by the families involved because:

"The ancient Roman nobility's survival had largely depended all along on the wealth and influence derived from close participation in the spiritual and temporal government of the papacy. It was their close family ties with the reigning popes to which they owed their considerable fortunes."

After 1510, it was not necessary for the emperors of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation to intervene in the papal election process. 

ca. 1550--Women banned from church choirs are replaced by castrati.
The ban was justified by Paul's letter to the Corinthians and other writings in the Bible:
Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church (I Corinthians 14:34-35)
So, the churches replaced women with castrated male singers who had a soprano, mezzo-soprano, or alto voice. This practice lasted to the end of 19th century, and with the Church's last castrato, Alessandro Moreschi, dying in 1922. Most were created by castrating boys before they reached puberty. This prevented their vocal cords from lengthening and their voice from deepening. With the lung capacity and muscular strength of an adult male and the vocal range of a prepubescent boy.
Pope Sixtus V (reign 1585-1590) issued a papal Bull in 1589 which approved the recruitment of castrati for the choir of St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. Castrati were later widely employed by opera companies. One source estimates that, during the 17th and 18th centuries, three to five thousand boys per year in Italy were castrated. The amputation was performed by butchers and barbers, and the death rate of the boys varied from 10-80% depending on the skills of the "physician."
Castration was forbidden much earlier under canon law because too many priests and bishops had performed self-castration and plucked out their right eye to avoid sexual sin or temptation according to the Bible:
For their are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it (Mathew 19:12)
But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh at a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell (Mathew5:28-29).
 
However, the church created a market for castrati by hiring them for its church choirs. The Sistine Chapel continued to employ castrati until 1903.
 
1633--Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) Condemned for Asserting that the Earth Moves

We by the grace of God, cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, Inquisitors General, by the Holy Apostolic see specially deputed, against heretical depravity throughout the whole Christian Republic.

Whereas you, Galileo, . . . , aged seventy years, were in the year 1615 denounced to this Holy Office for holding as true the false doctrine . . . .following the hypothesis of Copernicus, which are contrary to the true sense and authority of Holy Scripture: . . . . [namely] The proposition that the sun is the centre of the world and does not move from its place is absurd and false philosophically and formally heretical, because it is expressly contrary to the Holy Scripture. The proposition that the earth is not the centre of the world and immovable, but that it moves, and also with a diurnal [daily] motion, is equally absurd and false philosophically, and theologically considered, at least erroneous in faith. . . .

And in order that this your grave and pernicious error and transgression may not remain altogether unpunished, and that you may be more cautious for the future, and an example to others, that they may abstain from similar delinquencies—we ordain that the book of the “Dialogues of Galileo Galilei” be prohibited by public edict.

We condemn you to the formal prison of this Holy Office during our pleasure, and by way of salutary penance, we enjoin that for three years to come, you repeat once a week the seven penitential Psalms.

Reserving to ourselves full liberty to moderate, commute, or take off, in whole or in part, the aforesaid penalties and penance. And so we say, pronounce, sentence, declare, ordain, condemn and reserve, in this and any other better way and form which we can and may lawfully employ.

Galileo was required to recant his heliocentric ideas, and the idea that the Sun is stationary was condemned as "formally heretical." He would spent the rest of his life under house arrest.

1645--By the end of the Catholic Counter Reformation, extreme nepotism such as the appointment of popes by families was no longer possible. The popes had to be content with granting their friends and relatives:

  • government posts,

  • huge benefices, that is, church offices endowed with fixed capital assets that provide a living,

  • important fiefs, land with un-free peasants attached, on papal lands without any prejudice to sovereign authority. Besides land, dignities and offices and money rents were also given in fief.

  • princely and ducal titles for recently granted and ancient fiefs.

1806--Dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire
This political entity existed in western Europe for over 1,000 years and had begun with the coronation of Charlemagne as emperor in the year 800. After the 9th century its rulers were elected German kings, who usually sought, but did not always receive, imperial coronation by the popes in Rome. The empire ended with the last emperor Francis II (reign 1792-1806) who dissolved it on August 6, 1806. From now on, instead of negotiating with a single emperor, the church had to deal individually with the heads of states that formerly had made up the Holy Roman Empire.
 
1870--End of Papal States and Nepotism. Since 756, the existence of these states were an obstacle to the 19th-century movement for Italian unification because they divided Italy in two. A plebiscite was in favor to annex the Papal States and to make Rome the capital. Initially, the papacy did not accept the loss of property and temporal power but finally accepted the Lateran Treaty of 1929 (see below) that set up the independent ecclesiastical state of Vatican City .
 
Continued with part section E. "Modern Papacy" (21-27) below.
 
14. The Persecution and Massacres of Jews
The maltreatment and merciless killing of Jews from the 1st to the 20th century was primarily the result of Christian anti-Semitism. The break between Judaism and Christianity, and Judaic and Roman Christianity followed the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem in the year 70 CE by the Roman occupiers. This disaster was interpreted by Jewish and Christian theologians as a sign of divine punishment.
     Then, as the Gospels were written between 60 and 120, the unknown authors diminished the Roman Empires responsibility and inflated Jewish accountability in the death of Jesus. They did this explicitly in Matthew 27:24-25 which as written in ca. 70:
When Pilot saw that he could prevail nothing, . . ., he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it.
Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children.
And they blamed the Jews implicitly by, for instance, naming the apostle who betrayed Jesus Judas (Jewdas).
     Henceforth, and contrary to fact, the Jews were portrayed as killers of the Son of God. From the second century onwards, many of the leading Church Fathers wrote eloquently and persuasively of the Jews as a race of vipers and companions of the devil, and therefore a "rejected people" who were doomed to a borderline life of agony. They were condemned to have no homeland and to wander the world as despised people.
     This condemnation was taken up even more hatefully by Luther in the 16th century. With his reliance on the Bible as the sole source of Christian authority, he lamented: "We are at fault for not slaying them, rather we allow them to live freely in our midst despite their murder, cursing, blaspheming, lying and defaming." And even Germany's most famous philosopher Kant (1724-1804) had to express his disgust about the "Palestinians" as he called them though he had never met any. Later on the Nazis would quote Luther in their mass-murderous campaign while elevating Kant as their favorite philosopher.
     It was only in mid-twentieth century, after the Nazi-Holocaust, that the Catholic Church and many Protestant denominations published declarations repudiating anti-Judaic theology. 
ca. 450--The first synagogue was destroyed on command of bishop Innocentius of Dertona in Northern Italy. The first synagogue known to have been burned down was near the river Euphrat, on command of the bishop of Kallinikon in the year 388.
694--Council of Toledo: Jews were enslaved, their property confiscated, and their children forcibly baptized.
1010--The Bishop of Limoges (France) had the city's Jews, who would not convert to Christianity, expelled or killed.
1215--The sacred wafer massacre. The Fourth Lateran Council proclaimed the doctrine of transubstantiation (see "Probing Supernatural Truth Claims"). In the years following, rumors spread that Jews were stealing the consecrated wafers in order to crucify Jesus again by stabbing or driving nails thru them. It was reported that the pierced wafers bled, cried out, or released spirits. This was taken as an excuse to massacre Jews by Rintfleisch, an impoverished German knight, who had received from heaven a personal message in which he was appointed as the destroyer of all Jews. In 1298 Rintfleisch led a brigade that exterminated a number of defenseless Jewish communities in Rothenburg ob der Tauber, Wuerzburg, Noerdlingen, Bamberg, and Nuernberg. Approximately 5,000 Jews were killed.
1337--Starting in Deggendorf/Germany a Jew-killing craze reaches 51 towns in Bavaria, Austria, Poland.
1348--All Jews of Basel/Switzerland and Strasbourg/France (two thousand) burned.
1349--In more than 350 towns in Germany all Jews murdered, mostly burned alive. In this one year more Jews were killed than Christians in 200 years of ancient Roman persecution of Christians.
1389--In Prague 3,000 Jews were slaughtered.
1391--Seville's Jews killed (Archbishop Martinez leading). 4,000 were slain, 25,000 sold as slaves. Their identification was made easy by the brightly colored "badges of shame" that all Jews above the age of ten had been forced to wear.
1492--In the year Columbus set sail to conquer a New World, more than 150,000 Jews were expelled from Spain, many died on their way: 6/30/1492.
1543--Martin Luther publishes "On the Jews and their lies"
Here are some excerpts from this most venomous anti-Semitic writing that would in part spark the Holocaust of the 20th century:
I had made up my mind to write no more either about the Jews or against them. But since I learned that those miserable and accursed people do not cease to lure to themselves even us, that is, the Christians, I have published this little book, so that I might be found among those who opposed such poisonous activities of the Jews and who warned the Christians to be on their guard against them. I would not have believed that a Christian could be duped by the Jews into taking their exile and wretchedness upon himself. However, the devil is the god of the world, and wherever God's word is absent he has an easy task, not only with the weak but also with the strong. May God help us. Amen.
Luther then alleges and asks:

Their breath stinks for the gold and silver of the heathen; since no people  under the sun always have been, still are, and always will remain more avaricious than they, as can be noticed in their cursed usury. Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more  bitter, more poisonous, more vehement and enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew...Do not  their Talmud and rabbis write that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a  sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob - as they do with their money lending - from a heathen, is a divine service...

"Now what are we going to  do with these rejected, condemned Jewish people?"

...to set fire to their synagogues or schools and to bury and cover with dirt whatever will not burn... I advise that their houses be razed and destroyed...  I advise that all their prayer books... in which such idolatry, lies, cursing, and blasphemy are taught, be  taken from them... that their rabbis be forbidden to teach henceforth on pain of loss of  life and limb... that safe-conduct on the highways be abolished completely for the Jews... that all their treasure  of silver and gold be taken from them... But if the authorities are reluctant to use force and restrain the  Jews' devilish wantonness, the latter should, as we said, be expelled from their country and be told to return  to ... Jerusalem where they may lie, curse, blaspheme, defame, murder, steal, rob, practice usury, mock,  and indulge in all those infamous abominations which they practice among us, and leave ... our Lord the  Messiah, our faith, and our church undefiled and uncontaminated with their devilish tyranny and malice (my emphases).

1558--Pope Pius V orders the expulsion of the Jews from the Papal States, though for commercial reasons they were allowed to remain under degrading conditions in Rome and Ancona, a seaport on the Adriatic Sea. (more about Pius below).

1648--Chmielnitzki massacres: In Poland about 200,000 Jews were slain.
1938 to 1945--The Holocaust started on Nov. 9, 1938 with the Kristallnacht pogrom and led to the the systematic state-sponsored killing of six million Jewish men, women and children in Nazi extermination camps. In a speech Hitler asserted that he was doings God's work when ridding the world of Jews. Moreover, prisoners of war, political dissidents, trade unionists, Social Democrats, Gypsies (who were pure Arians), and millions of others "undesirables" were exterminated by Nazi Germany and its collaborators during World War II.
     Hans Küng, a leading Catholic theologian, stated that "Nazi anti-Judaism was the work of godless, anti-Christian criminals. But it would not have been possible without the almost two thousand years' pre-history of 'Christian' anti-Judaism." However, Küng does not explain the pope's silence, his sin of omission, for not speaking out against these atrocities of which he was aware. Moreover, the pope brought the Nazis to power and actively supported them to the end and even after the end with the Vatican Nazi-war-criminal escape line. How is he any better than the godless, anti-Christian criminals Küng is blaming?
1942 to 1943--Catholic extermination camps in Croatia. There existed numerous such facilities that were operated by the Catholic Ustasha under their dictator Ante Paveliç. He was a practicing Catholic and regular visitor to the then pope. There were even concentration camps exclusively for children!
     In these camps, the most notorious was Jasenovac, headed by a Franciscan friar - orthodox-Christian Serbians and a substantial number of Jews, Serbs, and Gypsies were murdered. Unlike the Nazis, the Catholic Ustasha burned their victims alive in kilns, while the Nazis were at least "decent" enough to have their victims gassed first. But most of the victims, estimated between 300,000 and 600,000, were simply stabbed, slain or shot to death.
     Many of the killers were Franciscan friars. The atrocities were appalling enough to induce bystanders of the Nazi "Sicherheitsdient der SS", watching, to complain about them to Hitler who did nothing. Also, the pope knew about these events and did nothing to prevent them.
     Pope Pius had cordial relations with the fascist Croat regime of Ante Pavelic, an ally of Hitler and Mussolini, despite his knowledge that it had massacred Orthodox Serbs, Gypsies, and Jews by the hundreds of thousands. His informed complicity was documented by Carlo Falconi, an Italian journalist and former priest who had had access to the Vatican archives.
 
 
15. The Holy Wars Against Moslems, Pagans, and Other Christians
a. Holy Wars Against Moslems and Jews
    1095 to 1250--The First thru Seventh "Holy Land" Crusades
    1212--The Children's Crusade
    11th to end of 15th century--The Re-conquest of Spain 
   
b. Holy Wars Against Pagans
    1211 to 1283--The Baltic or Northern Crusades
c. Holy Wars Against Other Christians
    1209 to 1229--The Albigensian Crusade
    1419 to 1436--The Hussite Crusade
    1572--The Massacre of Saint Bartholomew's Day
Introduction
The holy wars or crusades were against groups seen as enemies to the Roman Catholic version of Christendom. This included almost everyone outside the Church who was determined to impose its faith on the rest of the world. They were authorized by the pope either by sanctioning them explicitly or implicitly by his passive consent to the actions, or by quiet submission to a crusading ruler, for instance, Charlemagne's (reign 768-814).
     Crusaders, in the case of kings, were promised the crown of the Holy Roman Empire. All others were told to "undertake this journey for the remission of your sins, with the assurance of the imperishable glory of the kingdom of heaven" (Pope Urban II in 1095). This speech initiated a cruel and deadly chain of events that would last for several hundred years. The remission of sins encouraged massacres, rape, plunder, desecration of places sacred to others, mindless destruction of property, and other wicked action without guilt. Moreover, there was the material gain of conquered lands and booty.
     Also, two monastic, military orders were formed in the 12th century, the Knights Templar and the Knights Hospitaller. They were militarily trained to protect and help pilgrims to the Holy Land, but they also took vows of chastity and poverty. However, both orders, and in particular the Templars did monetarily very well. Later on, the Templars took on greater military duties and became a model and inspiration for other military orders. Their growing influence and wealth created envy from rival orders. Eventually, a king of France would forcefully dissolve them in the 14th century.
 
a. Holy Wars Against Moslems and Jews
 
1095 to 1250--The First thru Seventh "Holy Land" Crusades:
1095 to 1099--The mass slaughters by the First Crusade
1. On their way to the Holy Land about 12,000 Jews were slaughtered mainly in Germany. but also in Metz/France, Prag/Czech). [EJ]
2. In 1098, the Crusaders take Edessa and then Antioch. Ibn al Athir comments, "For three days they put people o the sword, killing more than a hundred thousand people and taking many prisoners." And Radulph of Caen relates, "In Maarra our troops boiled pagan adults in cooking pots; they impaled children on spits and devoured them grilled."
3. In 1099, Jerusalem falls and the whole population is put to the sword. The crusaders spent a week to massacre Muslims and Jews. About seventy thousand Muslims were killed in the Al-Aqsa Mosque, Jews gathered in their synagogue were burned alive, and monuments of saints, other mosques, and the tomb of Abraham was destroyed. The cleric Raymond of Aguilers, who was an eyewitness and chronicler, wrote:
 
"In the temple of Solomon, one rode in blood up to the knees and even
 to the horses' bridles, by the just and marvelous judgment of God."
 
1198 to 1204--The sacking of Constantinople by the Fourth Crusade
1. In 1202, some 30,000 Crusaders arrived in Venice to be shipped across the Mediterranean Sea. However, they did not have the funds to pay the Venetians as promised for the transport. The leader of Venice, then, offered a way out. If the Crusaders would capture the rival Christian port city Zadaron on the Adriatic Sea (now in Croatia), he would suspend the debt until it could be paid in captured booty. In November of 1202, the Crusaders seized the city for the Venetians.
2. While in Zadar, Alexius, the Byzantine prince asked the Crusaders to sail to Constantinople, topple the emperor of the Greek Orthodox Christian Eastern empire, and install him as the new emperor. For this deed they were offered an enormous amount of money, the promise that the Eastern church would be in submission to the pope, and that a large army would join them on their way to the Holy Land. They captured Constantinople in the second halve of 1203 and installed Alexius as emperor.
3. Alexius, however, was unable to pay, and was himself toppled late in January 1204. Deprived of their reward, the enraged Crusaders declared war on the city, which fell on April 12, 1204 and was promptly ravaged by the army of the Fourth Crusade. As one report notes:
What followed was one of the most profitable and disgraceful sacks of a city in history. Despite their oaths and the threat of excommunication, the Crusaders ruthlessly and systematically violated the city's holy sanctuaries, destroying, defiling, or stealing all they could lay hands on. Many also broke their vows to respect the women of Constantinople and assaulted them (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2008)       
The conquests of the Fourth Crusade would bring the merchants of Venice wealth thru new domains and maritime rights that assured its domination of the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Constantinople, however, would never be the same for the remainder of its Christian history. It would stay poverty-stricken, dilapidated, and largely uninhabited.
 
The 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th, and 7th Crusades. Although many thousands were killed on both sides, all of these Crusades were failures as far a their stated objectives are concerned.
 
1212--The Children's Crusade
The failure to re-conquer Jerusalem by the professional crusaders frustrated Europe's Christians who had strong feelings of piety and righteousness for this action. The religious fervor to do something ran high among the people and resulted sometimes in bizarre actions among which the Children's Crusade is probably the most grotesque. During the summer of 1212 two large groups formed with the objective to conquer the Holy Land by love rather than by violence.
     The movement started when a young French shepherd named Stephen had a vision in which Jesus ordered him to raise an army to help the Holy Land. It is estimated that he attracted about 30,000 followers willing to journey to the Holy Land. It was reported that they reached Marseille, "where they fell victim to disreputable merchants who shipped them to the slave markets in North Africa.
     A second group of about 20,000 children formed in the Rhineland under the leadership of a 10-year-old boy named Nicholas from Cologne. Those who reached Genoa were denied passage across the Mediterranean Sea. Some traveled to Rome where the Pope Innocent III released them from their crusade vows. It was reported that many of these children, like the first group, were sold in the East as slaves.
     Other reports note that both groups simply disappeared without a trace. Being sold into slavery in distant countries would make the disappearance and the earlier accounts plausible.
 
11th century to 1492--The Reconquest of Spain and Portugal
The Muslims (Moors), had occupied most of the Iberian Peninsula in the early 8th century. It was for the most part an Islamic Emirate or Caliphate where for the next 300 years Muslims, Christians, and Jews lived harmoniously together. However, in the 11th century, Moorish unity broke down and the Christian kingdoms of northern Spain developed an aggressive, anti-Muslim, crusading spirit. The Christian rulers proclaimed that they were re-conquering Christian territory lost to Muslim invaders. This ensured that Christian reinforcements would continue to arrive from other Christian realms, especially because the Papacy in Rome continued to support such efforts. A series of battles followed, and by the mid-13th century most of the peninsula had been subjected to Christian rule.
     Within a few years, and open, multi-ethnic and tolerant society was turned into a brutal, intolerant, anti-Semitic and anti-Islamic society. Subsequent Spanish emphasis on religious uniformity enforced with the help of the Inquisition led to forced conversions and finally the expulsion of people of Moorish and Jewish descent.
 
b. Holy Wars Against Pagans
1211 to 1283--The Baltic and Northern Crusades
The Baltic or Northern Crusades were crusades carried out by the Catholic kings of Denmark and Sweden, the German Teutonic military order, and other supporters against the pagans of Northern Europe around the southern and eastern shores of the Baltic Sea. The objective was Christianizing, and the incentive were prospective territory and booty. For instance, and particularly successful were the Teutonic Knights (Deutscher Orden). This was a German monastic, military order modeled on the order of the Knights Hospitaller towards the end of the 12th century. 
1211 to 1225 the Teutonic Knights battle the pagans of Transylvania.
They subdued the population and enduringly Christianized them. Their territorial gains were short lived, for they were soon expelled by the king of Hungary.
1233 to 1283 the conquest of Prussia by the Teutonic Knights.
Having learned from their failure to hold on to conquered territory, the grand master of the order, Hermann von Salza, set out to take new lands that would, however, be secure afterwards. Before going to war, he received the following assurances:
  • 1225--The Polish duke Conrad of Mazovia would grant lands to the Teutonic Knights if they would assist him against the pagan Prussians.
  • 1226--The Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II (reign 1220-1250) issued a charter, the Golden Bull of Rimini, that confirmed to Salza and his order the lands granted by the Polish duke and any other lands the Teutonic Knights might conquer from the Prussians.
  • 1234--Pope Gregory IX (reign 1227-1241) grants a second foundational charter to the order. Under this document, the papacy accepted the order's present, the war had started in 1233, and future conquests as property of the Holy See but would grant them back to the order in continuous ownership.
Most of the native Prussian population was exterminated over the next 50 years (from 1233-1283) while the Knights conquered their homeland. The order had now firm control over Prussia and could divide the spoils:
  • One-third of the conquered territories were given to the Church
  • The Teutonic Order became very rich after the pope relieved them from their vow of poverty in 1263.
  • German and Polish nobles where granted large estates
Finally, to repopulate, the annihilated pagans where replaced with imported German peasants. Their Christian religion had them well prepared for submissive servitude to farm the estates of the Church, the Teutonic Knights, and the German and Polish nobility.
 
c. Holy Wars Against Other Christians
1209 to 1229--The Albigensian Crusade
The most active heresy in Europe flourished in southern France and was known as Albigensianism or Catharism. They strived toward a simple religious life with the apostles of Jesus serving as role models. Also, they were dualists, that is, they believed that the universe was a battleground between good, which was spirit, and evil, which was matter. People were thought of as spirits trapped in material bodies. Moreover, they thought of the church as an invisible, spiritual force, and rejected it as a legal, financial, and dogmatic institution. This was the antithesis of the institutionalized Roman Catholic Church, and Pope Innocent III (reign 1198-1216) decided to have this heresy eradicated.
     The crusade was immensely popular with powerful noblemen in neighboring northern France because one could win a Crusade indulgence without traveling far from home, and best of all, the defeated territories and the property of the Cathars could be kept as booty. The Crusade consisted of massacres, expulsions, and forced conversions. It ended after almost twenty years when King Louis VIII of France restored control over the territory and made peace with the earlier French conquerors in 1229.
     When the crusaders asked how to distinguish between heretics and true Christians, a papal legate allegedly instructed them: "Kill them all, God will know his own." And as a result, almost the entire city of Béziers in the heart of Cathar territory was massacred. In Carcone in 1209 the Cathars were expelled with not even their cloth on their backs. Finally, the cooperation of the new nobility with the Inquisition run by Dominican friars virtually eliminated the heresy in the years thereafter. The inquisition had been introduced earlier in mid 12th century to detect and punish heresy. It was an effective instrument for bishops to maintain discipline in their dioceses.
 
1419 to 1436--The Hussite Crusades
These were military actions from ca. 1420 to ca. 1434 initiated by Pope Martin V (reign 1417-1431) and carried out largely by mercenaries, attracted by the hope of booty, under the leadership of German princes and Sigismund, King of Hungary, Germany, and Bohemia. The King was promised by the pope coronation as Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire which finally took place in 1433.
     The Hussites were followers of Jan Hus (ca. 1370-1415) who was a most important religious Reformer because his work anticipated the Protestant Reformation by a full century. On account of corruption in and by the Catholic church, they demanded reform. What angered Hus and his followers mostly was:
  • The Catholic church thru its higher clergy owned almost one-half of all the land in Bohemia. The massive wealth that came with estates was further enhanced by the sale of church offices. The lower clergy, the poor village priests, resented these conditions.
  • The peasants, too, were indignant about these conditions. But even worse, they suffered under heavy land taxes imposed by the church.
  • The sale of indulgences was authorized by Antipope John XXIII (1410-1415) to finance his campaign against Pope Gregory XII (reign 1406-1415). This was supported by the Bohemian King Wenceslas who customarily got as share of the proceeds.
Hence, the Hussites demanded what was later formalized in the Four Articles of Prague:

1. The word of God shall be preached and made known in the kingdom of Bohemia freely and in an orderly manner by the priests of the Lord.

2. The sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist shall be freely administered in the two kinds, that is bread and wine, to all the faithful in Christ who are not precluded by mortal sin - according to the word and disposition of Our Saviour.

3. The secular power over riches and worldly goods which the clergy possesses in contradiction to Christ’s precept, to the prejudice of its office and to the detriment of the secular arm, shall be taken and withdrawn from it, and the clergy itself shall be brought back to the evangelical rule and an apostolic life such as that which Christ and his apostles led.

4. All mortal sins, and in particular all public and other disorders, which are contrary to God’s law shall in every rank of life be duly and judiciously prohibited and destroyed by those whose office it is.

All this, and in particular resistance to the indulgences angered the King of Bohemia and the Roman church who felt that its authority was challenged. The King called on his brother, the Emperor, for help, and he in turn compelled Antipope John XXIII to invoke a council. The Council of Constance (1414-1418) invited Hus to attend and explain his views. He accepted since King Sigismund had guaranteed him safe conduct to and from the proceedings, and regardless of the council's decision concerning his proposed reform.
     Soon after his arrival in November of 1414, Hus was arrested and jailed with the Emperor's implicit consent. The majority of the council decided that he was a dangerous heretic and should be treated as such. On July 6, 1415, he was sentenced to death and promptly burned at the stake. This execution greatly incensed the people of Bohemia and many of their knights and nobles who all wanted church reform. From there on, the Hussite movement demanded an immediate and radical change - it had become revolutionary.
The First Hussite Crusade--Pope Martin V issued a bull in March 1420 which ordered a crusade "for the destruction of the Wycliffites [out of which the Hussites had emerged], Hussites and all other heretics in Bohemia. As noted above, King Sigismund and German princes led the troops who consisted largely of mercenaries that were attracted by the hope for plunder. In the end, the strongly motivated Hussites soundly defeated their adversaries and shortly thereafter controlled most of Bohemia.
The Second Hussite Crusade--A large German contingent of crusaders entered Bohemia in 1421. They attempted to storm the city of Zatec but were repelled. After the news arrived that Hussite troops were on their way, they decided on a strategic retreat, meaning, they fled. At the end of this year, the King Sigismund arrived and captured the town of Kutná Hora. Soon after, however, at the battle of Nemecky Brod on January 6, 1422, he was soundly defeated.
The Third Hussite Crusade--After the loss of the first two crusades, one would think that the papacy would take this as a sign from God to stop warring. But the Pope probably knew that "God is always on the side of the strongest battalions" (Napoleon). So, there was another attempt in 1423 that fizzled soon and ended in complete failure.
     There were many smaller wars until a peace agreement was signed on July 5, 1436 by now Emperor Sigismund, the Hussite delegates, and representatives of the Roman Catholic Church.
 
1572--The Massacre of Saint Bartholomew's Day
In France, on August 24 and 25 of that year, about 70,000 French Protestants, known as Huguenots, were killed by Catholic nobles and other citizens according to the contemporary Huguenot Duke de Sully, who himself barely escaped death. Modern sources put the number at 3,000 in Paris alone. Until the 17th century, 200,000 Huguenots flee to other countries.
     The hatred that sparked this atrocity was fostered by the Counter-Reformation directed at the time by Pope Pius V (reign 1566-1572). This Dominican had excelled as inquisitor of the Inquisition in discovering, examining, and punishing heretics and was made Grand Inquisitor of the Roman Church (1558). Pius, who had died three month before the massacre, was later elevated to sainthood for his moral perfection and the miracles he had worked during his lifetime. The massacre was celebrated by Pope Gregory XIII (1572-1585) with a Te Deum, a hymn of praise to God. Moreover, he had a medal struck to commemorate the event.

     Subsequently, the Huguenots abandoned the doctrine of obedience to the royal authority. They adopted the view that rebellion and tyrannicide, the killing of tyrants, were justifiable under certain circumstances.

16. The Inquisition
a. Theological and Biblical "Justification" for the Inquisition
b. The Inquisition from 380 to 1834
c. The Inquisition's Torture Techniques
Introduction
Helen Ellerbe had it right when she summarized:
Both the inquisition and . . . slavery relied upon the same religious justification. In keeping with the orthodox Christian belief in a singular and fearful God who rules at the pinnacle of hierarchy, power resided solely with authority, not with the individual.
Obedience and submission were valued far more than freedom and self-determination. The Inquisition played out the darkest consequences of such a belief system as it imprisoned and killed the spirits of countless people -- and not simply for a brief moment of time. The inquisition spanned centuries and was still active in some places as late as 1834 [my emphases].
 
Catholic clerics presiding over the torture of a man suspected to be a heretic before his subsequent execution during the Spanish Inquisition. Circa 1700 AD. According to Herrera Puga the authorities: "...placed no limits on the means; in this way they used the rack, the lash, fire, etc. In some cases...they applied padlocked irons to the flesh which even led to the amputation of a hand..." (Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
 
a. Biblical and Theological Justification for the Inquisition
Biblical justification
The agents of the Inquisition interpreted these two New Testament passages literally:
If a man abide not in me [Jesus of Nazareth], he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast [them] into the fire, and they are burned (John 15:6).
Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme (1 Timothy 1:20).
Theological justification
Christianity pleads for religious tolerance in the first three centuries. During this period, however, the Church was a powerless small minority who did not have the backing of the state. The Latin Church Fathers advocated friendly persuasion rather than force towards those who erred in matters of faith. Moreover, they urged for religious freedom of the individual.

ca. 200--Tertullian (ca. 157-220) was an early, important Christian theologian who wrote:

The natural law authorized man to follow only the voice of individual conscience in the practice of religion, since the acceptance of religion was a matter of free will, not of compulsion.

(Humani iuris et naturalis potestatis, unicuique quod putaverit colere, nec alii obest aut prodest alterius religio. Sed nec religionis est religionem colere, quae sponte suscipi debeat). 

ca. 300--Lactantius (240-320) was an early Christian apologist and one of the most reprinted Church Fathers. He points out:

Religion being a matter of the will, it cannot be forced on anyone; in this matter it is better to employ words than blows [verbis melius quam verberibus res agenda est]. Of what use is cruelty? What has the rack to do with piety? Surely there is no connection between truth and violence, between justice and cruelty . . . . It is true that nothing is so important as religion, and one must defend it at any cost [summâ vi] . . . It is true that it must be protected, but by dying for it, not by killing others; by long-suffering, not by violence; by faith, not by crime. If you attempt to defend religion with bloodshed and torture, what you do is not defense, but desecration and insult. For nothing is so intrinsically a matter of free will as religion. (Divine Institutes V:20)

And to this day, the Roman Catholic Church insists that she always adhered to the principle that religion could not be forced on others when dealing with the unbaptized. Also, the church claims that "when comparing the Mosaic Law and the Christian religion, they taught that the latter was content with a spiritual punishment of heretics (i.e. with excommunication), while Judaism necessarily proceeded against its dissidents with torture and death."

ca. 340--Religious tolerance ends when Christianity becomes the state's religion.

After Constantine died in 337, his successors "soon began to see in themselves Divinely appointed 'bishops of the exterior', i.e. masters of the temporal and material conditions of the Church. At the same time they retained the traditional authority of 'Pontifex Maximus' . . . . " (Catholic Encyclopedia), that is, they claimed the authority of head priest of the Roman state religion that was now the Roman Church's version of Christianity.

     And indeed, until the early modern period, it is the emperors that convene and preside over church councils and enforce its decrees. Moreover, it is the emperors who furnish the military power to convert pagans and go after those the state church perceives as a threat, e.g., Jews, Moslems, and diverging Christian religions, that is, heretics. Charlemagne (above) is a good example.

 

ca. 380--St. Optatus defends the state's right to kill heretics.

He writes against Donatism, a Christian sect that flourished in the 4th cent. and was noted for its rigorous views on morality and sanctity, esp. that of the clergy. In support of civil authority he contends:

. . . as though it were not permitted to come forward as avengers of God, and to pronounce sentence of death! . . . But, say you, the State cannot punish in the name of God. Yet was it not in the name of God that Moses and Phineas consigned to death the worshippers of the Golden Calf and those who despised the true religion?

     "This was the first time that a Catholic bishop championed a decisive cooperation of the State in religious questions, and its right to inflict death on heretics. For the first time, also, the Old Testament was appealed to, though such appeals had been previously rejected by Christian teachers" (Catholic Encyclopedia).

 

ca. 1250-- Thomas Aquinas demands the death penalty for heretics.

He insists that:

The acceptance of the faith is voluntary; however, once accepted, it becomes necessary to keep it.

(Accipere fidem est voluntaris, sed tenere fidem iam acceptam est necessitatis.)

b. The Inquisition from 380 to 1834
Soon after the Western Roman Empire officially ended in 476, the Roman Church formed an alliance with whoever ruler would support her. The early Church Father Ambrose (339-397) already used "Roman" and Christian" almost synonymously. With future Christian emperors to protect and promote the interests of the church, and the church taking on the responsibility to maintain social order thru preaching obedience to the emperors and administrating parts of the empire, most Christians thought of church and empire as one and the same.
     On account of the close alliance or merger of mutually supporting interests between church and state, heretics were thought of as enemies of society. Their beliefs could endanger the "common good," which was perceived as a natural order where everybody had a divinely ordained place. It just so happened that the nobility's and the upper clergy's place was on the very top. Hence, with the appearance of large scale heresies in the 11th and 12th century, the Inquisition was instituted in which church and state would cooperate, share the work, and exterminate the problem.
The working methodology of the Inquisition:
  • The inquisitors were mainly Dominican friars, that is wandering monks who lived initially mostly on alms. They roamed the countryside, villages, and towns independently of local bishops and priests to seek out heretics and other offenders. Hence, even the local clergy was not immune from their investigations. The friars were accountable only to the pope.  
  • "Guilty until proven innocent" was the laws of the Inquisition and as such replaced the common law tradition which was "innocent until proven guilty."
  • The persons charged were denied the right of counsel. Also, the accused could not confront informers and witnesses because their names were kept secret.
  • The inquisitor acted as prosecutor, judge, and jury. Hence, he would also determine the sentence.
  • It was almost impossible to be proven innocent because under torture, most of the accused would confess to anything the inquisitors wanted to hear. Those who would not even under the most excruciating pain admit wrongdoing, often died from the continuing torment. Since tortures had to stop before they could be fatal, it was judged that it was caused by the devil and proved that the accused had been guilty.
  • The inquisitor had the right to absolve his helpers for violent acts. This right was granted by the pope in 1245. Moreover, the inquisitor's helpers, spies, messengers, torturers, were permitted to carry arms.
  • Life expectancy was short for the imprisoned. One of the reasons was that neither the Inquisitor nor the community wanted to pay for their food.
  • Inquisitors prospered from:
  • Annual fines and bribes paid by the rich to escape prosecution.
  • The money and property of the convicted heretic which was confiscated by the Inquisition.
  • The accusation and conviction of the long dead, sometimes as long as 70 years, who were exhumed and burned. Their property was then taken from those who had it inherited.
  • "God punishes children for the sins of their parents" (its in the "Old" Testament) stated Pope Innocent III. Hence, the Roman law which provided that a portion of the  heretic's property be given to his or her dependents could be ignored. Hence, children and widows were left destitute.
  • The actual burning or execution was carried out by secular authorities. They, however, were coerced in doing so because otherwise they would face excommunication and be treated just like heretics. This allows the Church to claim that they never killed anyone. As noted above, extreme torture that resulted in death was blamed on the devil. 
380--Theodosius I.  orders the persecution and death penalty for heretics. Roman Catholic Christianity is now the state religion and soon to be indissolubly linked with the idea of a single Christian empire thought of as the earthly counterpart of the heavenly kingdom. Theodosius was known for his vigorous suppression of paganism and competing versions of Christianity such as Arianism. Also, Emperor Theodosius (reign 379-395) established the creed of the Council of Nicaea (325) as the universal norm for the Christian faith.

385--Priscillian (ca. 340-385) was the first heretic put to death.

He was an early Christian bishop who founded Priscillianism, an unorthodox rigorous ascetic. sect that persisted into the 6th century. He was ordered to defend himself in Trier (now in Germany) where he was found guilty of sorcery and immorality and thus executed.

1231--The Inquisition becomes a permanent and separate tribunal under Pope Gregory IX (reign 1227-1241). Also, the papal order demands that heretics suffer death by fire.

1252--The use of torture is authorized by Pope Innocent IV (1243-1254) to obtain confessions and the names of other heretics. Moreover, he declared "that anyone who attempted to construe a personal view of god which conflicted with church dogma must be burned without pity."

1478--The Spanish Inquisition authorized by Pope Sixtus IV, and who appointed the Dominican Tomás de Torquemada as Inquisitor General. He introduced the auto-da-fé, the public ceremony that was an elaborate celebration at which sentences were announced and mass execution by burning at the stake were carried out. This grand display of cruelty accomplished one primary objective, namely, to plant fear and terror in the minds of the masses.  

1490--People "... were deprived of the liberty to hear and talk freely," complains Juan de Mariana, "since in all cities, towns, and villages, there were persons [spies] placed to give information of what went on. this was considered by some the most wretched slavery and equal to death."

1542--The Roman Inquisition to combat Protestantism is established by Pope Paul III (1534-1549) as part of the Catholic Counter-Reformation. Historians report that it avoided the worst excesses of the earlier inquisitions. However, Pope Pius V (reign 1566-1572), a Dominican and former Grand Inquisitor, affirmed that matters of faith took precedence over all other functions and made it clear that his priority would be to see that heresy, false doctrine, and error were suppressed. He actively participated in the affairs of the Inquisition.f

1570--The Inquisition reached the Americas soon after Columbus discovered it for the Europeans in 1492. By 1570 there were independent tribunals in Peru and Mexico. Native Americans who would not convert were treated like heretics and burned.

1600--Giordano Bruno (ca. 1548-1600) Dominican monk, near death after almost eight years of incarceration, was burned at the stake, on the Campo dei Fiori (Rome) on 2/17/1600, for his scientific and religious views that were considered heretical.

1834--After 356 years of terror the Spanish Inquisition is finally abolished.

1908--The Inquisition is renamed the Holy Office by Pope Pius X.

1917--Torture is abolished by the Roman Church in the new Code of Canon Law.

1965--Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is presently the name of the former  Inquisition. Like the Inquisition, it is charged with maintaining the purity of the faith, however, by modern means such as removing their professors of theology from teaching positions if the findings of their research does not coincide with church doctrine. 

1966--Possession and reading of the Bible is no longer banned. The Bible was listed on the Index of Forbidden Books by the Roman Catholic Church. These were publications considered perilous to the faith, morals, and theology. Moreover, they could be dangerous to the power of the Church and its hierarchy. Catholics who violated the ban could be punished with excommunication. The Index of Forbidden Books was finally abolished in 1966 by Pope Paul VI (reign 1963-1978).

c. The Inquisition's Torture Techniques

Many styles of torture had been invented during the Inquisition so as to inflict the most horrific pain on the victims without killing them. The worst of these techniques were turned upon those accused of witchcraft. With Pope Innocent VIII issuance of a papal bull against witches in 1484, the torture of people accused of being a witch reached fanatical proportions. The worst tortures of the inquisition occurred in Germany and France. Also, there was no limit to the types and cruelty of the tortures. The Inquisition meant anything was allowed:

  • Acid was poured on victims and hands were immersed into pots of boiling oil and water.
  • Alcohol was poured on the head of the poor victim and set alight.
  • Water was poured down the victims throat with a knotted cloth. The cloth was then jerked out tearing up the victims bowels.
  • Secondary torture was the name for torturing the victims family to pain him or her.
  • Sleep deprivation had a number of negative physical and psychological effects. A subject might be kept awake for several days and when finally allowed to fall asleep, suddenly awakened and questioned. As one so tortured in our time reports: "In the head of the interrogated prisoner, a haze begins to form. His spirit is wearied to death, his legs are unsteady, and he has one sole desire: to sleep...Anyone who has experienced this desire knows that not even hunger and thirst are comparable with it" (Menachem Begin).
Techniques requiring devices:
  • Red hot irons were inserted up vaginas and rectums.
  • Sharp iron forks were used to mangle breasts.
  • Red hot pincers were used to tear off flesh.
  • Saws--The victim was tied upside down with the legs spread apart. With the blood primarily diverted to the brain, this ensured that the victim maintained consciousness for as long as possible. Moreover, it slowed the loss of blood and caused maximum humiliation. The torture could last several hours. While some victims were cut completely in half as a symbolic gesture, most were only cut up to their abdomen to prolong the time it took for them to die.
  • Sharp poles were used to slowly impale victims. they were forced to sit on a sharp, thick pole. The pole was then raised upright and the victim was left to slide further down the pole by his or her own weight. Often, the pole would emerge through the sternum so that its tip could be placed under the chin to prevent further sliding. It could take the victim up to three days to die.
  • Turcas were used to tear out fingernails. After the nails were ripped out needles were shoved into the exposed sensitive flesh.
  • Thumbscrews were used to crush the fingers and toes. There were many variations of this device. Some were designed to slowly crush fingers, while others were built to do the same to toes, knees and elbows. they were all simple but extremely painful vises.
  • Tongue tearers attached firmly to tongues with the leverage of a screw so that they could be torn out.
  • Irons were used to gouge out eyes.
  • Breast rippers allowed a firm all-around grip so that breast could be torn out.
  • The pear, an expanding metal device, was inserted into the mouth, rectum or vagina. A screw mechanism then makes its pointed “leaves” expand while inside any of those orifices, resulting in severe internal mutilation.
  • Iron maidens tightly enclosed and tortured their victims. The interior of this device was lined with strategically-placed sharp objects that were intended to torture. These spikes impaled the victim in the eyes, the chest and the back, but usually missed vital organs, so as to leave the victim bleeding profusely and in great pain, but still alive for a period of time.
  • The coffin was a metal cage roughly made in the shape of the human body. The condemned to death victim was placed inside and it was frequently hung from a tree or a gallows. Birds or animals could then eat the victims flesh.
  • The rack was a contraption designed to dislocate every single joint in its victim’s body. Tied across the device’s board by the ankles and wrists, the victim’s body is then pulled in opposite directions by turning rollers at either end of the board.
  • The breaking wheel was an execution device, but the hours before actual death were excruciating. The victim is tied to the side of the wheel, then gets every bone in his body shattered one by one by an executioner using a hammer or an iron bar. Victims of this form of torture often took hours, or even days to die. Some were “fortunate” enough to be granted “mercy”, in the form of fatal blows to the chest or stomach.

17.                The Witchcraft Trials (1330-1700)
Innocent women, men, and children convicted and burned alive for
crimes, sex with male and female devils, that were in fact not possible.
Although the most acute judges of the witches and even the witches themselves, were convinced of the guilt of witchery, the guilt nevertheless was non-existent. It is thus with all guilt.
                                             Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
 
a.) Biblical, theological, and papal justifications for witch hunts
b.) The five common witchcraft offences 
c.) The condemned Johannes Junius explains his confession
d.) The trial and execution of nine year old Christine Teipel
Introduction
The seeking out, trial, and execution of the innocent as witches intensified in the mid 1400s when it became a priority for the Inquisition. Over almost three centuries, it is estimated that about 100,000 to 1 million innocent women, men, and children were tortured and burned at the stake if they survived the torment to extract a confession. Those who confessed and repented were often shown "mercy" and strangled to death before being burned. However, those who would not confess even under torture were accused of being aided by the devil. On the way to the stake or gallows victims were flogged, burned, branded and had their hands and tongues hacked off. During torture a clerk recorded what was said and sometimes what was not said. The torturers were paid out of seized funds belonging to the victim. If the victim had no money then the relatives were made to pay.
     During this time nobody not even animals were safe. Pigs, bulls, cows, birds, mice, and locusts were properly tried and condemned to hang, to be burned at the stake, or to be banished. A rooster was found guilty for laying an egg and burned at the stake. Some birds were found guilty of disturbing a Holy Mass and therefore banished. 
     The condemned were for the most part from among the poor and defenseless. It was only after some pillars of the community, the prosperous and professionals, were accused that community leaders began to have a personal interest in the validity of witch trials. By the end of the 17th century and the beginning of the Age of Reason, skepticism resulted in legislation and theologies that dismissed the concept of witchcraft in most European countries. Moreover, by the 17th century the Catholic church began to loose power and with it the Inquisition's major support structure collapsed. The last execution was in Switzerland in 1782. Britain prosecuted under the Witchcraft Act until the late 1940s, but it was repealed in 1951.  
Execution of alleged witches "in one fire." Jacob Truchsess
von der Scheer at Waldsee (?) had 21 witches executed on
June 10, 1587. The next day, another 8 witches were burned.
(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
 
a.) Biblical, theological, and papal justifications for witch hunts
Biblical
Most New Testament translators use the terms sorcerer and sorcery rather than witch and witchcraft. There are several references in the Christian Bible: Acts 8:9 and 13:6, Galatians 5:20, Revelation 21:8 and 22:15.
However, the Hebrew Bible ("Old" Testament) strongly condemns witchcraft:
Exodus 22:18--"Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."
Leviticus 20:27--"A man also or woman that has a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard [a person who practices magic or sorcery], shall surely put to death: they shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them."
Leviticus 19:26--"Ye shall not eat anything with the blood: neither shall ye use enchantment [cast a spell over, as by magic; bewitch], nor observe times."
Deuteronomy 18:10-12--"There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,
Or a charmer [a person casting spells or an amulet, that is, a thing having magical powers], or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer [communication with the spirits of deceased persons]
For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee."
Theological
ca. 906--Canon law, in Canon Episcopi, declared that belief in the existence of witchcraft  was heresy. They supported their assertion with the Church father Augustine of Hippo (354-430) declaration that a heretic is one who either devises or follows false and new opinions for the sake of some temporal profit." 
     In 1486 the witch-hunt inquisitors received a powerful instrument when the Dominican monk Heinrich Krämer published Malleus maleficarum ("The Witches' Hammer"). It was an instruction manual and collection of prejudices against women that formed the basis for systematically finding and justifying prosecutable offences.
     Krämer accuses women of having insatiable sexual appetites, thus, their intimacy with male devils, incubi. Moreover, he thinks that they are deficient in their ability to belief in God. He comes up with grotesque roots of the word femina "feminine", namely, fides "belief" and minus "less."   In support of his arguments he often cites the Bible,refers to Thomas Aquinas superstition theory, and emphasizes Pope Innocent's 1484 Witches Bull (see below).  
     It was one of the most pernicious books of world literature that had devastating consequences in particular for women. It appeared in 29 editions between 1487 and 1669. This period also marked the peak of the European mass hysteria.
     On 25 August 1538, Martin Luther had a discussion about witches and sorceresses who steal chicken eggs out of nests, or steal milk and butter. Doctor Martin said: "One should show no mercy to these [women]; I would burn them myself, for we read in the Law that the priests were the ones to begin the stoning of criminals" (WA Tr 4, 51-52, no. 3979 quoted and translated in Karant-Nunn, 236).
     One historian reports that "Protestants blamed the witch trials on the methods of the Catholic Inquisition and the theology of Catholic scholasticism, while Catholic scholars indignantly retorted that Lutheran preachers drew more witchcraft theory from Luther and the Bible than from medieval Catholic thinkers" (H.C. Erik Midelfort, Witch Hunting in Southwestern Germany 1562-1684).
Papal
In 1374 pope Gregory XI declared that all magic was done with the aid of demons and thus was open to prosecution for heresy.
In 1484 Pope Innocent VIII published the Witches Bull Summis desiderantes affectibus ("Desiring with the Greatest Ardor") in which he condemned witchcraft as Satanism, which is the worst of all possible heresies.
 
b.) The five common witchcraft offences
These acts were connected or cumulative, that is, one leading to another. The sentence was generally death as demanded in the Biblical passage "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live (Exodus 22:18). Execution was usually by burning at the stake.
 
A judge accusing a huddling and trembling from fear woman:
You apostate, you witch, you dumb dog! Confess your sin of witchery, reveal the names of your accomplices! You filthy whore, you devil's wanton, you sackcloth-maker, you dumb toad! Speak and confess in God's name! Swallow the holy salt! Drink the holy water! Tell who it was that taught you witchcraft, and whom you saw and recognized at the witches' Sabbath. Then you will not be tortured any more but have eternal life (reported in a 1676 book by Hermann Löher, a former judge who had to flee Germany after being accused of being a witch).
 
The victims are compelled to confess what they could not possibly have done:
1. A pact with the devil to perform evil acts for the devil in return for rewards such as money, supernatural and malevolent sorcery abilities from him. At first the poor accused were told to confess. They were then stripped naked, shaved, pricked with needles for insensitive spots and then examined for marks of the devil.
2. Intercourse with devils.
Women, men, and children were accused and confessed to having had intercourse with devils. The Incubus (plural Incubi) from the Latin incubare for being placed on top (incubating) was a male devil who had sex with females. The Succubus (plural Succubi) from the Latin succumbere for being placed below was a female devil who copulated with males.
     Another widespread theory was that the devil was asexual (sexless). He would first as a Succubus extract sperm from a male, then transform into an Incubus and use that sperm to impregnate a female. Deformed born children were considered evidence of such a union and got the mother into trouble. In all cases, intercourse with the devil was considered a willful act of submission and dedication to the devil. Hence, it was a deliberate turning away from God.     
3. Witch's flight and and transformation into animals
Witches on brooms could fly thru the air to meetings with the devil and other witches. Moreover, they could transform themselves into a variety of animals, for example, werewolves. These supernatural abilities were granted by the devil as part of the pact with him.  
4. Participation in the witches' Sabbath
This occurred usually at midnight in distant places where the participants arrived by supernatural means. It was a meeting place for witches and other devil worshippers. Here they would engage in individual sex with the devil and also participate in orgies, that is, in feasting, wild celebrations, and sex with multiple partners in worship of the devil.
5. Malevolent sorcery
These most harmful abilities were granted by the devil as part of the contract with him. The alleged witches were accused of us using black magic to bring about disasters that effected the many such as floods, droughts, bad harvests, and pestilences like the black death. Also, they brought about misfortunes that effected individuals: accidents, loss of property, loss of a loved one, infertility, and bad health. They used incantations (formulas and chants), curses, profanity, and blasphemous utterances to invoke the devil who would bring about the malicious, wished-for circumstances. Moreover, merely touching or an evil glance from a witch could be disastrous for things or beings.
 
    
c.) The condemned Johannes Junius explains his confession
He had been incarcerated in the witch prison of the city of Bamberg, Germany. Under excruciating torture, he had finally confessed to witchcraft. While awaiting execution, he wrote the following letter to his daughter:

Many hundred thousand goodnights, dearly beloved daughter Veronica. Innocent I have come to prison, innocent have I been tortured, innocent must I die. For whosoever comes into the witch prison must be a witch or be tortured until he invents something out of his head ... I will tell you how it has gone to me ... the executioner ... put the thumbscrews on me, that blood ran out at the nails and everywhere. So that for four weeks I could not use my hands as you can see from my writing ... Thereafter the stripped me, bound my hands behind me, and drew me up in torture. Then I thought heaven and earth were at an end; eight times did they draw me up and let me fall again, so that I suffered a terrible agony. The executioner said, "Sir, I beg you for God's sake confess something, whether it be true or not, for you cannot endure the torture which you will be put to, and even if you bear it all, yet you will not escape" ... [He then explained the confession he gave] Now my dear child you have all my confession, for which I must die. And they are sheer lies and made up things, so help me God. For all this I was forced to say through fear of torture which was threatened beyond what I had endured. For they never leave off with the torture till one confesses something, be he ever so good, he must be a witch. Nobody escapes ... (Margaret Knight in Honest to man: Christian ethics re-examined, p.92-93)

d.) The trial and execution of nine year old Christine Teipel
Among the 20,000 or so witch trials is the well-known trial of the nine year old child Christine Teipel (1621-1630) in Oberkirchen which is located in the eastern part of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
On March 7, 1630, Christine was interrogated and named 15 more persons, 8 men, 6 women, and a little girl, who allegedly had participated in nightly devil-dances. The named where then arrested and tortured. In turn, they revealed more followers of the devil.
From April to June, 1630 there were as a consequence seven series of witch-trials in which 58 persons were convicted and burned at the stake, among them 22 men and two children.
On Mai 4, 1630 as part of the third series of witch trials, Christine Teipel was executed.
     There are commemorative plaques that remind visitors of the witch hunts and the trial of Christine Teipel in the "Witches Square" in the Lüttmecke at Oberkirchen.
 
18. The Reformation and Counter-Reformation (1517-1648)
The Reformation was sparked by the Augustinian Monk Martin Luther (1483-1546). It was primarily indignation over spiritual or theological corruption in the Roman Catholic Church that compelled him to act. Secular or temporal depravity in the Church was merely the means for him to get the many disgusted with the Church and establish a theologically reformed church. He found support among some of the 225 German princes who saw this as an opportunity to confiscate the Church's wealth in their domain and get rid of papal authority, taxes and other impositions.
     The Protestant revolution was initiated when Luther in 1517 published his 95 theses that challenged the theology and practice of selling indulgences (forgivenesses for sins). In the subsequent religious wars, the Roman Catholic Church was supported by conservatives who wanted to maintain the traditional order, the emperor, most princes, and the higher-up clergy such as bishops who administrated large estates. The Lutherans were supported by the North German princes, the lower clergy, the trade and business classes, and large segments of the peasantry. By the end of this struggle with Catholic powers in 1648, Protestantism was firmly established and forms now together with Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy the three major branches of Christianity.
     Luther suffered from the idea that he had to earn God's mercy thru his own efforts such as doing good works. This he perceived as a struggle in which he could probably not succeed. But a passage in the Bible solved his problem, for Romans 3:28 states: "Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law [demanding all sorts of action such as good works]." He found other passages in the Bible that made it clear to him that his Church needed to be reformed. It was only after the Church refused to listen and excommunicated and persecuted him, that he started a new reformed church.  
Her are Luther's fivefold "alone . . ." doctrines to reform Christianity:
  • Sola scriptura--the Scriptures alone, not traditions, are the foundation of the faith (Galatians 2:6-9).
  • Solus Christus--Christ alone, not the Church, has authority over believers (Ephesians 5:23-24).
  • Sola gratia--thru the mercy of God alone, not thru one's own doing, is the believer saved (Romans 1:17).
  • Sola fide--thru faith alone, not thru good works, achieve humans righteousness (Galatians 2:16).
  • Sola disciplina--thru education alone, not appointment or mere ordination, is one best qualified for preaching and pastoral care. Hence, this individual may be a member of the congregation--the concept of the priesthood of the laity or all believers. Hence, priests as intermediaries between believers and God are not necessary. This concept is based on the definition of a Christian community, that is, at least two persons who meet in the name of Christ (Mathew 18,19) and the development of a Priesthood of the laity (I Corinthian 12).
To this day, these dogmas form the common denominator for Protestant churches. However, many insist on the ordination of qualified believers. Luther thought that his theological reform would go to the root of corruption in the life of the church.
     Luther was highly irrational:
  • He firmly believed in the existence of evil, demons, witches and other superstitions.
  • He hated reason and called it "the devil's bride," a "beautiful whore" and "God's worst enemy."
  • He hated understanding and the evidence of the senses: "Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding, and whatever it sees it must put out of sight, and wish to know nothing but the word of God."
  • He, of course, as can be seen from above, believed in the literal interpretation of the Bible.
 But Luther should also be credited with some major deeds:
  • He was the first to translated the Bible into German. Thus made the Scriptures available to Protestants. Catholics were forbidden to read the Bible in any language until the mid 1960s. 
  • He used understandable vernacular German in his translation. This made a major contribution to the development of what is now standard German (High German) as the language is now spoken and written.
  • His new theology, together with the translation of the Bible, broke the interpretation monopoly of the Catholic Church. The laity could now study and decide on the meaning of the Scriptures.
  • His reformation served as a wake-up call for the Catholic Church to reform before she would sink in her spiritual and temporal cesspool of iniquity.  
  • His action was the straw that broke the camel's back of mind control by the Church. Hence, it made possible free thought not seen since the Greek and Roman cultures were oppressed and then perished. This allowed the 18th century Age of Reason and the Enlightenment to take place. This development would eventually lead to the modern separation of state and church.
and major misdeeds:
  • He sided with the rich and powerful princes against the poor and powerless peasants whose pitiful existence was caused and perpetuated by their oppression and exploitation. This was a renewal of the alliance between throne and alter for mutual benefits that we already observed when Christianity became the religion of the Roman Empire.
  • He stated that the rulers, who may be "heathens," are "the ministers of God," and are not bound by the Gospel. However, they may, actually have the "duty,"  "with a clear conscience" and without legal "judgment," "smite and punish" the peasants if in the ruler's opinion they disregard the Gospel (see "The Peasant's Revolt, Luther's Betray and Slave Morality" below).
  • His violent anti-Semitic tirades have been judged by scholars as "Germanizing the Christian critique of Judaism and establishing anti-Semitism as a key element of German culture and national identity."
         Others argue that "he caused a "hysterical and demonizing mentality" about Jews to enter German thought and discourse, a mentality that might otherwise have been absent (see above "1543 - Martin Luther publishes 'On the Jews and their lies'").
1517 to 1648--The Catholic Counter-Reformation
This movement was in part the Roman Church's reaction to the Protestant "theological" assault and to rulers denouncing papal authority and confiscating Church property. Moreover, it was a theological and disciplinary reformation toward internal renewal that would hopefully eliminate endemic corruption that had infested the Church from top to bottom.
     Besides the religious wars that ended only in 1648, the following action was taken to respond to Protestantism as well as abuses, ignorance, and corruption within the church:
  • Against the indignation of the Protestant reformers it emphatically declared as spiritually vital: indulgences, pilgrimages, the veneration of saints, relics, and the Virgin Mary, salvation through faith and works (not faith alone as the reformers claimed), their version of the Eucharist together with the other six sacraments (the Reformers had a different version of the Eucharist and wanted to reduce the sacraments to only two).
  • They maintained the prohibition for the laity to read the Bible. In addition they started "The Index of Prohibited Books" that was upheld until the mid 1960s when it was voided and the laity was also allowed to read the Bible.
  • They commissioned a handbook of questions and answers for teaching their interpretation of the Bible and other tenets as they had developed over time. This was probably done in response to Luther's 1929 Augsburg Catechism. This "Roman Catechism" was used until 1992 when it was replaced with the "Catechism of the Catholic Church."
  • Many parish priests had been badly educated, that is, they did not know Latin, hence, they could not even read the Bible. Therefore, it was decided to better educate them, teach them Latin, theology, and the art of apologetics, that is, how to defend and demonstrate the truth of the Church's teachings. The seminary-trained priests would gradually replace the crudely educated during the seventeenth century.
  • The appointments of Bishops for political reasons was no longer accepted, however, nepotism continued into the seventeenth century but came to an end when the papal states were returned to the people in 1870. The Church's large estates all over Europe were administrated by bishops who thus had little time for spiritual matters. These shepherds were often absent from their dioceses thus leaving the priests unsupervised. This absenteeism came to an end.
  • The emergence of a new or forgotten mysticism with emphasis on God as a fearsome but unknowable, beyond the range of ordinary human comprehension or experience, absolute ruler. However, individual religious experiences could yield glimpses of Him together with strong emotional feelings of a divine presence. For example, the nun Teresa of Avila (1515-1582) claimed to have had a variety of mystical visions that resulted in an ecstatic union of her soul with God.
  • Old monastic orders, such as the Benedictines and Dominicans, were reformed and revived. New religious orders were formed, for example, the Capuchins, Ursulines, Theatines, and most importantly, the Society of Jesus, known as the Jesuits who were founded by Ignatius of Loyola (1491-1556).
  • The Jesuits were the main instrument of the Counter-Reformation. They pursued two important goals:
1. They established elite schools that were high on learning and discipline. Their graduates would be well-equipped to combat the advance of Protestantism and fill top academic positions at Catholic universities. By the 17th century, they were reputed to be Europe's best educators.
2. They were determined to win back to Catholicism parts of Germany and eastern Europe. In this effort they succeeded and, for instance, Poland was re-converted largely on account of their missionary activities. This ministry was also extended to the Far East into countries like India, China, and Japan.
Loyola's vow to "serve only God and the Roman pontiff, His vicar on earth" was taken seriously by his order. They served as the "shock troops of the papacy" to this day with implementing papal policies.
  • The evangelization of the Americas would bring millions of new believers into the fold.
  • The pursuit of heretics and witches was intensified (see above The Inquisition and The Witchcraft Trials).
1555--The Peace of Augsburg, by the Diet (assembly of rulers) of the Holy Roman Empire assembled earlier that year at Augsburg, ended the violence between the Lutherans and the Catholics in Germany for more than fifty years. Moreover, it was the first permanent legal basis for the existence of Lutheranism as well as Catholicism in Germany. It confirmed the result of the 1526 Diet of Speyer and stated that:
  • All of the 225 German Princes could choose the religion (Lutheranism or Catholicism) of their realms according to their conscience.

  • Lutherans living in an ecclesiastical, under the control of a bishop, state could continue to practice their faith.

  • Lutherans could keep the territory that they had captured from the Catholic Church since the Peace of Passau in 1552.

  • The ecclesiastical leaders, bishops, of the Catholic Church that had converted to Lutheranism were required to give up their territories

  • The population occupying a state that had officially chosen either Lutheranism or Catholicism could not practice a religion differing from that of the state.

Hence, the princes decided on the religion of their choice which would become the only "choice" for the population under their control. This is the ancient prerogative of powerful despots: "He who rules, determines the religion of the fools."

1618 to 1648--The Horrors of the Thirty Years' Religious War
This war involved most of the powerful nations of continental Europe and was mainly fought on German soil. It started about disagreements between Catholics and Protestants about unresolved underlying problems and different interpretations of the 1555 Peace of Augsburg (above). The main adversaries were the Catholic Habsburg Dynasty and their allies against the Protestant princes of German supported by Denmark and Sweden. As the war dragged on, major nations involved used the war to regain or gain more territory.
     Many of the contending armies were mercenaries, many of whom did not get paid. Thus, they turned to a predatory strategy that embodied much of this conflict.
  • The armies of both sides plundered as they marched, leaving cities, towns, villages, and farms devastated thus causing famines while spreading diseases such as pestilences.
  • The Swedish army alone destroyed 17,000 villages, 1,400 towns, and about 2,000 castles.
  • The overall population of Germany was reduces by a third, and about half of all males had perished. In some areas the population was reduced by two thirds.
  • During this time, nobody was safe. Uncertainty, fear, turmoil, brutality in the form of torture, murder, rape, and other horrors characterized everyday life--it was hell on earth.
  • For example, Protestant Magdeburg was stormed in 1631 by Imperial troops under Count von Tilly who was the principal commander of the Catholic League. As his soldiers went out of control, they pillaged, raped and massacred the population. Moreover, they set fire to the city in a dozen or so different locations. Only 5,000 of the 30,000 inhabitants survived. Thereafter, most of the survivors fled with only about 400 residents remaining.
During this time, and for generations afterwards, the normally hard life of the people became one of fear, poverty, and diseases. It would take about one hundred years after the 1648 peace treaty (below) for the population and economy to recover.
1648--The Treaty of Westphalia Brings all Hostilities to an End

Finally, there was religious peace within the Holy Roman Empire and it would survive until its dissolution in 1806. The major denominations now lived in relative peace on the continent.

The main tenets of the Peace of Westphalia were:

  • All parties would now recognize the Peace of Augsburg of 1555 (see above)
  • Christians living in principalities where their denomination was not the established church were guaranteed the right to practice their faith in public during allotted hours and in private at their will.
  • The idea of the Holy Roman Empire having secular dominion over the entire Christian world was nullified. The nation-state would be the highest level of government, subservient to no others.

Significance for the concepts of diplomacy among nation-states:

  • The principle of the sovereignty of states and the fundamental right of political self determination

  • The principle of (legal) equality between states

  • The principle of non-intervention of one state in the internal affairs of another state

These principles of tolerance allowed Catholic and Protestant factions to cooperate and go to war for reasons of state and not for reasons of religion.

And to this day, the Catholic and Protestant churches have dominated Germany’s spiritual and educational life including that of philosophy. As a consequence of this dominance, at most German universities, the chair of philosophy belongs to one or other of the two churches. Thus, most philosophy departments at German universities are the de facto handmaidens of religion. This in part explains why religious philosophers such as Kant and Heidegger are held in high esteem on account of their religious but not philosophical contributions. Kant's widely celebrated Critique of Pure Reason and Heidegger's Being and Time are massive works of mystification and camouflage promoting religion.

19. The Peasant's Revolt, Luther's Betrayal and Slave Morality
1524 to 1525--Peasant uprisings occurred frequently during the Middle Ages. This particular revolt was an economic and religious uprising by peasants, townsfolk and nobles, however, there was no common program. Between 70,000 and100,000 had died by the time the revolt was put down. At this time in medieval Europe, the peasants were mainly serfs who where bound to the land, that is, they could be bought, sold or transferred with the land. They had to work the landholders and their own fields with the landholders parcels having priority. 
     As the peasants were increasingly oppressed and exploited to the point were it was no longer bearable, they demanded democratic reform and basic human rights as stated in the Twelve Articles below. This document was one of the first to demand such reforms and rights, and it appeared first in Memmingen (Germany) on February 1525. However, their grievances were ridiculed and dismissed, and so they revolted.
     Details of the Peasants' situation and oppression may be inferred from their grievances as summarized in these articles:
         The Twelve Articles of Demands and Aims by the Peasant Movement
  1. It is our humble petition and desire that in the future each community should choose and appoint a pastor, and that we should have the right to depose him should he conduct himself improperly . . .
  2. We are ready and willing to pay the fair tithe or grain . . . The small tithes [of cattle], whether [to] ecclesiastical or lay lords, we will not pay at all, for the Lord God created cattle for the free use of man . . .
  3. We . . . take it for granted that you will release us from serfdom as true Christians, unless it should be shown us from the Gospel that we are serfs.
  4. It has been the custom heretofore that no poor man should be allowed to catch venison [the flesh of a deer or similar animal] or wildfowl or fish in flowing water, which seems o us quite unseemly and unbrotherly as well as selfish and not agreeable to the word of God . . .
  5. We are aggrieved in the matter of wood cutting, for the noblemen have appropriated all the woods to themselves . . .
  6. In regard to the excessive services* demanded of us which are increased from day to day, we ask that this matter be properly looked into so that we shall not continue to be oppressed in this way . . .
  7. We will not hereafter allow ourselves to be further oppressed by our lords, but will let them demand only what is just and proper according to the word of the agreement between the lord and the peasant. The lord should no longer try to force more services or other dues from the peasant without payment . . .
  8. We are greatly burdened because our holdings cannot support the rent exacted from them . . . We ask that the lords may appoint persons of honor to inspect these holdings and fix a rent in accordance with justice . . .
  9. We are burdened with a great evil in the constant making of new laws . . . In our opinion we should be judged according to the old written law . . .
  10. We are aggrieved by the appropriation . . . of meadows and fields which at one time belonged to a community as a whole. These we will take again into our own hands . . .
  11. We will entirely abolish the death tax [by which the lord received the best horse, cow, or garment of a family upon the death of a serf] and will no longer endure it, nor allow widows and orphans to be thus shamefully robbed against God's will, and in violation of justice and right . . .
  12. It is our conclusion and final resolution, that if any one or more of the articles here set forth should not be in agreement with the Word of God, as we think they are, such article we will willingly retract.
In European History, Vol. 2 (Philadelphia: Dept. of History, University of Pennsylvania, 1897).
*These services were required without regard for the peasant's essentials for life. For instance, the seeding and harvesting of the lord's holdings had priority over the peasant's fields which required the same work and at the same time.
Luther's Condemnation of the Peasant Revolt
Occasionally some murders occurred during the uprising. For instance, on "Bloody Easter Sunday" (4-16-1525), the governor and the occupying nobility of Castle Weibertreu were speared by some peasant farmers under the leadership of Jäcklin Rohrbach. However, they were immediately excluded from the peasants' troop. Wrong as it was, it was insignificant when compared to the traditional inhumane treatment of the peasants, the subsequent mass murders of the peasants by mercenary troops, and the torture murder of sympathizers.
     Luther responded, but he was hedging his bets, for this pamphlet was written in May 1525 at the height of the peasants' power, but it was not made public until after their defeat. Luther titled his pamphlet:
                 Against the Murderous, Thieving Hordes of Peasants

The peasants have taken on themselves the burden of three terrible sins against God and man, by which they have abundantly merited death in body and soul.

In the first place, they have sworn to be true and faithful, submissive and obedient, to their rulers, as Christ commands, when he says, ‘Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's,’ and in Romans XIII, ‘Let everyone be subject unto the higher powers.’ Because they are breaking this obedience, and are setting themselves against the higher powers, willfully and with violence, they have forfeited body and soul, as faithless, perjured, lying, disobedient knaves and scoundrels are wont to do. St. Paul passed this judgment on them in Romans XIII when he said, that they who resist the power will bring a judgment upon themselves. This saying will smite the peasants sooner or later, for it is God's will that faith be kept and duty done.

In the second place, they are starting a rebellion, and violently robbing and plundering monasteries and castles which are not theirs, by which they have a second time deserved death in body and soul, if only as highwaymen and murderers. Besides, any man against whom it can be proved that he is a maker of sedition is outside the law of God and Empire, so that the first who can slay him is doing right and well [Jesus was crucified for sedition, so according to Luther the Romans did the right thing]. For if a man is an open rebel every man is his judge and executioner, just as when a fire starts, the first to put it out is the best man. For rebellion is not simple murder, but is like a great fire, which attacks and lays waste a whole land. Thus rebellion brings with it a land full of murder and bloodshed, makes widows and orphans, and turns everything upside down, like the greatest disaster. Therefore let everyone who can, smite, slay and stab, secretly or openly, remembering that nothing can be more poisonous, hurtful or devilish than a rebel. It is just as when one must kill a mad dog; if you do not strike him, he will strike you, and a whole land with you.

In the third place, they cloak this terrible and horrible sin with the Gospel, call themselves ‘Christian brothers’, receive oaths and homage, and compel people to hold with them to these abominations. Thus they become the greatest of all blasphemers of God and slanderers of his holy Name, serving the devil, under the outward appearance of the Gospel, thus earning death in body and soul ten times over. . . .
     It does not help the peasants, when they pretend that, according to Genesis I and II, all things were created free and common, and that all of us alike have been baptized. For under the New Testament Moses does not count; for there stands our Master, Christ, and subjects us, with our bodies and our property, to the emperor and the law of this world, when he says, ‘Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's.’ Paul, too, says, in Romans XII, to all baptized Christians, ‘Let every man be subject to the power’, and Peter says, ‘Be subject to every ordinance of man.’ By this doctrine of Christ we are bound to live, as the Father commands from heaven, saying, ‘This is My beloved Son; hear him.’ For baptism does not make men free in body and property, but in soul; and the Gospel does not make goods common, except in the case of those who do of their own free will what the apostles and disciples did in Acts IV. They did not demand, as do our insane peasants in their raging, that the goods of others - of a Pilate and a Herod - should be common, but only their own goods. Our peasants, however, would have other men's goods common, and keep their own goods for themselves. Fine Christians these! I think there is not a devil left in hell; they have all gone into the peasants. Their raving has gone beyond all measure.
     Since the peasants, then, have brought both God and man down upon them and are already so many times guilty of death in body and soul, since they submit to no court and wait for no verdict, but only rage on, I must instruct the worldly governors how they are to act in the matter with a clear conscience.
     First. I will not oppose a ruler who, even though be does not tolerate the Gospel, will smite and punish these peasants without offering to submit the case to judgment. For he is within his rights, since the peasants are not contending any longer for the Gospel, but have become faithless, perjured, disobedient, rebellious murderers, robbers and blasphemers, whom even heathen rulers have the right and power to punish; nay, it is their duty to punish them, for it is just for this purpose that they bear the sword, and are ‘the ministers of God upon him that doeth evil’ [my emphases].
 
Evaluation: Luther is Preaching a Perfect Slave Morality
Luther cites:
Jesus: "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's" (Mathew 22:21).
Paul: "Let every soul be subject unto higher powers. For there is no power but that of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God; and they that resisteth shall receive to them themselves damnation" (Romans 13:1-2).
Peter says, "Submit yourself to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme; Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of the evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well" (1 Peter 2:13-14)
But Luther is wrong when he states "For under the New Testament Moses does not count;" This disregards that the "historical" Jesus was a practicing Jew, who taught that the social laws of the Hebrew Scriptures must be followed. He emphasizes: "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill" (Matthew 5:17) These laws at least implicitly condemned all exploitation, oppression and enslavement.
Conclusion, according to Luther:
1. The rulers who do not obey the Gospel, or may even be heathens, may "with a clear conscience" and without a legal "judgment" "smite and punish" the peasants if in the ruler's opinion they disregard the Gospel.
2. The ruled, however, whether Gospel-obeying or not, have no rights whatsoever to defend themselves even if the ruler's oppression and lawlessness violates the Gospel and the common-sense moral decencies.
Luther, nevertheless, benefited from his violent and illogical prejudices.
The pamphlet convinced the rulers that Luther was determined to uphold the existing social order. Thus, the Lutheranism would neither threaten their power nor their privileges. If however, he had supported the Peasants' revolt, that would have doomed his theological reform from lasting beyond the 1520s.
 
E.  Enslaving, Colonizing, Proselytizing in the Name of Christianity
20. Theological and Biblical "Justification" for Slavery
21. Slavery from 107 CE to 1888 CE
22. The Colonization of Latin America
23. The First 20th Century Genocide in German South-West Africa
24. Proselytizing by God's Chinese Son Causes 20 Million Death

 

20. Theological and Biblical "Justification" for Slavery
Theological support
ca. 390 - Saint John Chrysostom (meaning the golden-mouthed, 347-407) reemphasizes the New Testament when he demands:
The slave should be resigned to his lot, in obeying his master he is obeying God ... 
ca. 400--Saint Augustine (354-430) wrote in his City of God:
... slavery is not penal in character and planned by that law which commands the preservation of the natural order and forbids disturbance.
With other words, slavery was God's will, and by teaching this, Christianity did not make slaves free but made good slaves out of bad ones.
In the 18th century--the Anglican Bishop of London (reign 1723-1748), Edmund Gibson, expresses the thinking of the upper Christian clergy when he observes that Christianity does not change the master-slave relationship:
The freedom which Christianity gives, is a Freedom from the Bondage of Sin and Satan, and from the Domination of Men's Lusts and Passions and inordinate Desires; but as to their outward Condition, whatever that was before, whether bond or free, their being baptized, and becoming Christians, makes no manner of Change in it.
Support for slavery in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament)
Leviticus 25:44-46 [How to buy and sell slaves.]
Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, [shall be] of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bondmaids.
     Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that [are] with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.
     And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit [them for] a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with rigour.
Exodus 21:2-6 [How Hebrew slaves should be treated.]
If thou buy a Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing.
     If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself: if he were married, then his wife shall go out with him.
     If his master have given him a wife, and she have borne him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he shall go out by himself.
     And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free:
    then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the doorpost; and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him for ever.
Exodus 21:7-11 [How to deal with female sex slaves.]
And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do.
     If she please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he let her be redeemed: to sell her unto a strange nation he shall have no power, seeing he hath dealt deceitfully with her.
     And if he have betrothed her unto his son, he shall deal with her after the manner of daughters
     If he take him another wife, her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish.
     And if he do not these three unto her, then shall she go out free without money.
Exodus 21:20-21 [How to beat a slave to death with a clear conscience]
And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished.
    Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two [to live], he shall not be punished: for he is his money [property].
 
Support for slavery in the Christian Bible (New Testament)
Ephesians 6:5
Servants, be obedient to them that are [your] masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ;
1 Timothy 6:1-2
Let as many servants as are under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honour, that the name of God and [his] doctrine be not blasphemed.
     And they [Christians] that have believing [Christian] masters, let them not despise [them], because they are brethren; but rather do [them] service, because they are faithful and beloved, partakers of the benefit. These things teach and exhort.
Luke 12:47-48
And that servant, which knew his lord's will, and prepared not [himself], neither did according to his will, shall be beaten with many [stripes].
     But he that knew not, and did commit things worthy of stripes, shall be beaten with few [stripes]. For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.
Titus 2:9-10
[Exhort] servants to be obedient unto their own masters, [and] to please [them] well in all [things]; not answering again;
     Not purloining [stealing], but shewing [showing] all good fidelity; that they may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things.
 
21. Slavery from 107 CE to 1888 CE
The Christian church became the biggest slave owner in the Roman Empire. Popes kept slaves until the eighteenth century. Altogether, Christianity supported the notion of slavery for more than eighteen hundred years.
      Slavery together with torture and murder is probably the worst thing a person can do to another. It may be safely assumed that the practice of slavery dates to prehistoric times but became institutionalized when the products of agriculture allowed larger organized societies to form.
     Involuntary subjection to another is a matter of degree:
  • Slavery emphasizes the idea of complete ownership and control by a master. A slave was considered by law as property or chattel (a movable item of personal property such as a car, furniture, etc.), and was deprived of the rights ordinarily held by free persons. Legally and often socially he had no kin; hence, no relatives could stand up for his rights or get justice for him. In the society that held slaves, they were considered "nobodies," "outsiders," "barely adequate individuals," or "socially dead persons." The limits on how much a slave could be abused was close to that on how animals could be treated. 
  •  Bondage indicates a state of subjugation or captivity often involving burdensome and degrading labor.
  • Servitude is compulsory service, often such as is required by a legal penalty, for instance, convicts serving their penalty as indentured servants.
  • Serfdom was an institution close to slavery and bondage but less severe.
  • Peonage was like serfdom. It was a system of servitude common in Latin America, particularly in the area that is now Mexico. In the U.S. before the civil War, forms of peonage existed in the territories of New Mexico and Arizona, as well as in the South were poor blacks and whites were subjected to it.
  • Sharecropping was still another form of popular peonage in the southeastern U.S. after slavery was abolished. By this system, the sharecropper and his family worked the land in return for a share in the profits from the harvested crops.
Farmable land as the basic source of wealth
For the last 10,000 years, from the beginning of agriculture to the industrial revolution, fertile soil was the most common and basic source of wealth. The difference between the few who lived well and free and the many who lived poorly and in servitude was the ownership or control of land.
     Ownership of land by itself, however, did not produce anything. The land had to be worked on to produce crops and raise animals. And since this is hard, backbreaking labor, the owners were not too eager to do it themselves. Hence, they came up with the idea to let others live on the soil and let them "by the sweat of their eyebrows" carve out a minimum to sustain life for themselves in exchange for doing all the work.
    But where did these ownership rights come from? And how should we deal with them if they were immorally acquired? A French political philosopher explains:
The first man who, having enclosed a piece of ground, thought of saying "This is mine" and found people simple enough to believe him, was the real founder of civil society. From how many crimes, wars, and murders, from how many horrors and misfortunes might not anyone have saved mankind, by pulling up the stakes, or filling up the ditch, and crying to his fellows: "Beware of listening to this impostor; you are undone if you once forget that the fruit of this earth belong to us all, and the earth itself to nobody."
                                                    Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778)
     The emperor and his nobility, as well as the pope and his upper clergy, were fully aware that in this world possession or control of land was the paramount determinant of the social order. Moreover, with ownership came an income from rent and taxation as well as political power and free labor. Also, the livelihood of all whether they occupied castles, churches, or towns, depended on the agrarian workers. But by the end of the Western Roman Empire, the Roman legions had disappeared and with it the supply of slaves and their control in case of rebellions. Hence, a new supply of labor was needed that would hopefully be , but what?
     The answer was an ideology that would be imposed as a divinely ordained natural order of things. The many were persuaded, by the sword if necessary, that this earth belonged to the emperor and the papacy who ruled thru power sharing and mutual support. Their authority came from the pope being God's representative on earth, a kind of king of kings as the papacy claimed, and the emperor was also divinely appointed as his coronation by the pope verified. The land was then divided and further subdivided into manageable units and in a chain of command down from the emperor to kings, from kings to princes and bishops, and from them to knights and vassals. The many, if they wanted to exist, had no choice but to except this order of things.
 
ca. 107-117--Ignatius of Antioch refuses the request of Christian slaves to have their freedom purchased out of the common fund.
ca. 1020--Benedict VIII (reign 1012-1024) condemned the children of priests to be slaves.
Fifteenth century - Papal licenses were granted to the Kings of Portugal in the fifteenth century to conquer 'heathen' countries and reduce their inhabitants to "everlasting slavery."
The non-Christian world is divided by popes between Spain and Portugal.
In 1493, Pope Alexander VI (reign 1492-1503), one of the most corrupt popes, on request of the rulers of Spain, Ferdinand and Isabella, issued a bull granting Spain the exclusive right to explore the seas and claim all New World lands lying west of a north-south line 100 leagues (about 320 miles) west of the Cape Verde Islands. Portugal was granted similar rights of exploration east of the demarcation line. This papal disposition was jointly amended by Spain and Portugal in the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494.
In 1506, Pope Julius II (reign 1503-1513) sanctioned the amendment, specifying a new boundary, made in the 1494 Treaty of Tordesillas. The new boundary enabled Portugal to claim the coast of Brazil after its discovery by Pedro Álvares Cabral in 1500. Brazilian exploration and settlement far to the west of the line of demarcation in subsequent centuries laid a firm basis for Brazil's claims to vast areas of the interior of South America.
In 1514, a bull by Pope Leo X (reign 1513-1521) forbade others to interfere with Portugal's possessions in India, the East Indies, and Brazil. Portugal's claim was grounded in the earlier 1494 Treaty of Tordesillas
In 1529, the Treaty of Saragossa or Treaty of Zaragoza specified the anti-meridian to the line of demarcation specified in the Treaty of Tordesillas (above). It divided the other side of the world between Spain and Portugal. Portugal gained control of all lands and seas west of the Saragossa line, including all of Asia and its neighboring islands so far "discovered," leaving Spain most of the Pacific Ocean. Besides Brazil and the Moluccas, Portugal would eventually control Angola, Mozambique, Guinea-Bissau, and São Tomé and Príncipe in Africa; Goa and Daman and Diu in India; and East Timor and Macau in the Far East.
ca. 1533 - Pope Paul III (reign 1534-1549) decreed slavery for all Englishmen who supported Henry VIII of England.
ca. 500 to ca. 1850--European serfdom.
The word 'serf" comes from the Latin word "servus", which means servant or slave. The large, privately held estates in the Roman Empire had been worked by slaves. However, starting in the second century, they were gradually divided into peasant holdings. Over the next few centuries, this system moved towards what is now described as serfdom.
     The following features characterized the lives of serves:
  • While slaves could be bought and sold without reference to a parcel of land, the serfs were bound to a hereditary piece of land and to the will of whoever owned the land.
  • The serf could not leave the landlord's property to which he was bound without the lord's permission.
  • The serf could not marry, change his kind of work, or sell a personal belonging without the lord's consent. 
     More details of the serve's situation and oppression may be inferred from their grievances as summarized in "The Twelve Articles of Demands and Aims by the Peasant Movement" above in "The Peasant's Revolt, Luther's Betrayal and Slave Morality."
 
ca. 1500 to 1888--African slavery in the Americas
Eventually, the capture and transport of African slaves become so efficient that the Portuguese plantation owners of Brazil found it more economical to work their slaves to death and simply replace them with new ones.
Slavery in the Spanish-Portuguese New World colonies began with local native Americans who they called Indians. Conquistadors had been granted trusteeship over the indigenous people they conquered, in an expansion of familiar feudal institutions that approached the conditions of slavery. Due to imported European diseases, however, the native populations shrank to the point of near extermination. Hence, very early in the 16th century African slaves began to be used to work in the silver mines and plantations. By the year 1600, Spanish Christians had looted and plundered across the new world bringing the "benefits" of Christianity to the indigenous people, ca. 60 million of whom died on account of European diseases, excruciating labor, or being killed for various reasons.
     The African slave trade, as we have seen, was initially stimulated by the demand for labor in Latin America. The practice was started by the Portuguese, who needed agricultural workers, in 1444 along the coast of West Africa. For the most part, the African slaves were captured by other Africans in raids and then transported to the coast where they would be sold to slave traders and shipped to the Americas.
     The Slave trade peaked in the 18th century with an estimated 5.2 million imported, and another 2.8 million imported by the 1860s when slavery gradually came to an end. Most contemporary historians estimate that a total of 9.4 to 12 million Africans arrived in the New World, that is, mainly in Brazil. If the 20-30 percent figure of those who died during transportation and storage is correct, other estimates are much higher, then about 3 million perished without reaching their destination.
 
Slaves in Chains (Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
     Slavery in North America, roughly the boundary of present day U.S., began in ca. 1640 and lasted until 1865. People of African descent were legally but inhumanely held captive. Their owners were mostly whites, but a very small number of American Indians and free blacks also owned them. By many in the North, and eminent statesman such as George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, slavery was regarded as evil and inconsistent with the 1776 Declaration of Independence. Still, the slave population rose from 893,603 in 1800 to 3,953,760 when the 1860 census was taken.
     Approximately one Southern family in four held slaves prior to the Civil War. According to the 1860 U.S. census, fewer than 385,000 individuals (i.e. 1.4% of White Americans in the country, or 4.8% of southern whites) owned one or more slaves. 95% of blacks lived in the South, comprising one third of the population there as opposed to 1% of the population of the North.
 
Am I Not A Man And A Brother.  From the title page to abolitionist Anthony Benezet's book Some Historical Account of Guinea, London, 1788 (Photo source: Wikimedia Commons).
     Long after the legal abolition of slavery in the U.S., the former slaves were discriminated against when denied equal treatment before the law, job opportunities, education, and housing. They were referred to as sambos, which is a disparaging and offensive racial slur. As late as the early 20th century, they were associated with apes in exhibitions (see Ota Benga below).
 
Pigmies and European Explorer  
Some Pygmies were exhibited in human zoos, such as Ota Benga, below,
displayed by eugenicist Madison Grant In the Bronx (U.S.) Zoo.
(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons).
 
Ota Benga (ca.1883-1916) was a Congolese pigmy who was featured in a 1906 human zoo exhibit at the Bronx (U.S.) Zoo alongside an orangutan (Photos source: Wikimedia Commons).
 
22.                 The Colonization of Latin America
For "God, glory, and gold," or "glory, greed, and religious crusading zeal," as one Spanish conquistador confirmed when he explained that he and his kind went to the New World to "serve God and His Majesty, to give light to those who were in darkness, and to grow rich, as all men desire to do." (quotes from J. J. Spielvogel's Western Civilization, Vol. II)
Introduction. Latin America was colonized by Spain and Portugal. The rulers of these two countries received extensive authority and "moral justification" from the Roman Catholic Church in their efforts to conquer these lands, abolish their cultures, and firmly establish their governments. Roman Catholicism was the only recognized religion in the colonies. However, Church policy and organization was delegated to, thus, determined by the monarchs. In exchange for Christianizing, "educating," and pacifying the Native Americans, the Roman Church and the various Catholic religious orders were awarded many privileges and immense areas of territory.
In October 1492--Christopher Columbus (1451-1506), on behalf of Queen Isabella of Spain, was looking for a westward sea route to Asia. On this expedition, he discovered the Americas for Catholic European nations when he reached and explored the Bahamas, the coastline of Cuba, and the northern shores of Hispaniola, which is today's Haiti and the Dominican Republic. In subsequent voyages, he reached all the major islands of the Caribbean Sea and the mainland of Central America.
     The following events eventually culminated in one of the bloodiest periods in human history and in an apex of papal power:
  • In 1493, Pope Alexander VI grants* the New World to Spain and Portugal. On request of the rulers of Spain, Ferdinand and Isabella issued a bull granting Spain the exclusive right to explore the seas and claim all New World lands lying west of a north-south line 100 leagues (about 320 miles) west of the Cape Verde Islands. Portugal was granted similar rights of exploration east of the demarcation line. This papal disposition was jointly amended by Spain and Portugal in the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494. *The popes claimed this authority because the world belonged to God since He created it. And the popes considered themselves the sole representatives of God on earth since He had founded the Catholic Church. Moreover, the popes claimed to be king of kings with the right to appoint and dispose worldly rulers.
  • Church authorities approved military conquest on the grounds of converting non-Christians to the Roman Catholic version of the Christian faith and to eradicate indigenous religious practices.
  • In subsequent years, by papal agreement, Catholic monarchs were given extensive rights over church affairs in the new territories because the papacy recognized that it did not have the resources to support such an extensive missionary effort as was necessary. The monarchs, then, empowered the conquistadors when they granted them trusteeship over the indigenous people they conquered, in an expansion of familiar feudal institutions that approached the conditions of slavery.
  • The monarchs, through their administrations, "could appoint all bishops and clergy, build churches, collect fees, and supervise the affairs of the various religious orders who sought to Christianize the heathens."
  •  Catholic missionaries--especially the Dominicans, Franciscans, and Jesuits--soon spread throughout the new territories where they converted and baptized hundreds of thousands of Indians in the early year of the conquest. To facilitate conversions, and to make sure that the native Americans would become docile subjects to the empire, they would be removed from their homes and placed into larger villages. To this day, this was the world's most successful missionary effort, for ninety percent of the 540 million living today in Latin America are Roman Catholics.
  • The conquests of Mexico and Peru are among the most dramatic and brutal events in modern world history. The murderous conquistadors were assisted by monks who established the Spanish Inquisition first in Peru in 1570 and the following year in Mexico.
As a tragic consequence of these conquests:
  • The native populations were nearly exterminated** on account of European diseases, excruciating, forced labor, starvation, or being killed for various reasons. For example, the island of Hispaniola (Haiti and the Dominican Republic) had about 100,000 inhabitants when Columbus arrived in 1493; however, only 300 Indians survived by 1570. By the year 1600, Spanish Christians had looted and plundered across the new world bringing the "benefits" of Christianity to the indigenous people, ca. 60 million of whom died on account of the above.
  • The Indians had no resistance to diseases such as smallpox, measles, and typhus that caused most painful dying. In the case of smallpox, death frequently occurs after a week or two of illness, brought on by the toxic effects of huge quantities of virus in the blood and the inflammatory response of the body's immune system. It is estimated that 30 to 40 percent of the natives died from these scorches.
  • Forced labor, enslavement, was another major cause of death. The settlers from Spain and Portugal brutally used the Indians on their plantations and in their gold and silver mines. They literally worked them to death. As we have seen above, many of the African slaves that replaced the Indians would experience the same fate.
  • And as bad, the Indians' belief system, culture, and civilization were virtually annihilated. Some of these civilizations had long histories and a record of enormous social, architectural, and technological achievements. Few people in history fared worse. Their bodies were enslaved by conquistadors and settlers, their minds were deprived of comforting traditions by monks who with the help of secular authorities bludgeoned them into acceptance of Roman Catholicism with this Church's version of Jesus Christ as their savior.
  • To this day, probably on account of historical events related to the conquest, the Roman Catholic Church in the New World was always a conservative force. Initially, the Church worked to protect the political power and prestige of the conquerors and the Spanish and Portuguese colonial authorities. Later, the same protection was extended to often murderous, military dictatorships. 
**The Indians of North America experienced the same calamity. However, here it was seen  by some of the colonists as a divinely sanctioned opportunity to take the Indian's land. As researched by R. Takaki in A Different Mirror:
John Winthrop declared that the decimation of Indians by smallpox manifested a Puritan destiny: God was making room for the colonists and hath thereby cleared our title to this place.
After on epidemic, William Bradford reported that the Indians fell sick of the smallpox, and died most miserably. He recorded in his diary:
For it pleased God to visit these Indians with a great sickness and such a mortality that of a thousand, above nine and a half hundred of them died, and many of them did rot above ground for want of a burial.
Between 1610 and 1675, the Indian population declined sharply. For example, from 12,000 to a mere 3,000 for the Abenakis and from 65,000 to 10,000 for the southern New England tribes. Here the death rate reported is between 75 and 95 percent. There is no plausible reason why it should not have been the same in Latin America.
 
Girl Smallpox Victim (Photo source: Wikimedia Commons)
However, Spain, Europe, and the Vatican gained tremendously in wealth and power:
  • The Church became rich as the Spanish elite became rich through its exploitation of the resources and peoples of the New World. The Church became a great landowner through grants from the monarchs and through bequests from Catholics who died in the New World.
  • Between 1503 and 1650 over thirty-five million pounds of silver and 407,000 pounds of gold entered the port of Seville alone. Much of the gold and silver extracted at the expense of millionth of lives ended up decorating Europe's palaces, churches, cathedrals, and basilicas.
  • Moreover, sugar, dyes, cotton, vanilla, and hides from livestock in the pampas entered Spain via Seville.
  • Also, new agricultural products such as potatoes, coffee, corn, and tobacco were exported to Spain.
As Spielvogel reports:
Economic historians believe that the increase in the volume and area of European trade as well as the rise in fluid capital due to this expansion were crucial factors in producing a new era of commercial capitalism that represented the first step toward the world economy that has characterized the modern historical era.
 
To add insult to the historical Latin-American atrocities, on Sunday, May 13, 2007 Pope Benedict XVI speaking at the opening of a 19-day conference of Latin-American bishops declared that Latin-American Indians had been "silently longing" to become Christians when the Spanish and Portuguese conquerors took over their native lands centuries ago. According to this extraordinary untruth, the misery, enslavement, mass extinction, and the destruction of their cultures was simply a price they had to pay to have their "silent longing" satisfied.
    
23. The First 20th Century Genocide in German South-West Africa

 

Between 1880 and 1914, European nations, all solidly Christian, raced to colonize the entire continent of Africa (see map below). During this scramble for African territory, the English made it clear that they were not interested in the territory of South-West Africa, and so in 1884 it was declared a German protectorate. At that time it was Germany's only overseas territory deemed suitable for white settlement.

Christian,

Map showing European claimants to the

African continent in 1913. Almost all of the

continent was colonized by European nations

(Photo source: Wikimedia Commons).

 

1904 to 1907--The Herero and Nama Genocide

On January 12, 1904, the Herero people under Samuel Maharero rose in rebellion against the German colonial rule in German South-West Africa or what is now modern-day Namibia. They killed about 120 Germans, including women and children, and destroyed their farms. In response, the German Government dispatched 14,000 soldiers to resolve the crisis. Their leader, Lothar von Trotha issued an ultimatum to the Hereros:

I, the great general of the German troops, send this letter to the Herero people... All Hereros must leave this land... Any Herero found within the German borders with or without a gun, with or without cattle, will be shot. I shall no longer receive any women or children; I will drive them back to their people. I will shoot them. This is my decision for the Herero people.

     In August of the same year, the Herero were defeated in the Battle of Waterberg. They and their families were driven into the desert of Omaheke, where most of them died of thirst. In October, the Nama also took up arms against the Germans, and were dealt with in a similar fashion. In total, some 65,000 Herero (80 percent of the total Herero population), and 10,000 Nama (50 percent of the total Nama population) perished. Characteristic of the genocide was death by starvation and the poisoning of wells for the Herero and Nama population that was trapped in the Namib Desert.

     Although General Trotha's orders to kill every male Herero and drive the women and children into the desert were lifted in 1904 by the German Emperor, it was too late to prevent the massacre. By the end of 1904, survivors, mostly women and children, were herded into concentration camps.  and given as slave labour to German businesses, where many died of overwork and malnutrition. German enterprises were able to rent Herero people for manpower, and death of workers was permitted, and reported to the German authorities. Forced labor, disease, and malnutrition killed an estimated 50 to 80 percent of the entire Herero population by 1908, when the camps were closed (citation required). This extermination thus qualifies as genocide.

Surviving Herero reduced to skeletons (Photo source: Wikimedia Commons).

    In 1985, the United Nations' Whitaker Report recognized Germany's attempt to exterminate the Herero and Nama peoples of South-West Africa as one of the earlier attempts at genocide in the 20th century. The German government has also apologized for the atrocities in 2004.

24. Proselytizing by God's Chinese Son Causes 20 Million Death
It was an attempt, between 1850 and 1864, by Hong Xiuquan (1814-64) to make China a new Christian kingdom. He became a Christian convert after reading a Chinese translation of the Bible. It made him realize that in an earlier dream-vision he had seen God the Father and His son, Jesus. Moreover, in this dream, he was anointed as Jesus' younger brother, that is, God's Chinese son. He thus felt empowered and would form what was probably the most effective messianic Christian revolutionary movement of all times. Western scholars usually name it the Taiping, meaning "Great Peace," rebellion.
Background that made the movement possible.
In the 18th and 19th centuries there was a great demand in the West for Chinese luxury goods such as porcelain, silk, and tea. China, however, was a self-sufficient country with little need for western goods. Hence, western traders, initially Portuguese but later mostly British, exported opium from India and sold it to China. Levels of opium addiction grew fast and had a negative effect on large segments of society including the imperial troops and the official classes. Hence, the Chinese Government tried to outlaw the opium trade. The western powers, however, did not want to lose the most lucrative opium trade and successfully defended it in two wars.
     By the time of the first opium war (1839-42), import to China had grown from 200 chests a year in 1729 to 40,000 chests (a chest weighing 140 pounds). This war was won by Great Britain and it halted Chinese efforts to stop the trade. As the opium addiction worsened, the Chinese tried to stop it once more. By the time of the second opium war (1856-60), imports had grown to around 60,000 chests a year. After France and Britain won this war, a series of agreements, supplementing existing ones, were imposed on the Chinese:
  • It was now legal to import opium.
  • Foreigners could travel in the interior of China.
  • Christian missionaries could proselytize their faith everywhere.
  • Several new ports to Western trade and residence became available.
  • All major water ways such as the Yangtze River were open to foreign navigation.
     The opium trade grew for the next 30 years in part because other Western nations joined. Those who joined included the United States, which dealt in Turkish as well as Indian opium.
     Hong Xiuquan's Christian missionary movement was made possible by the Treaty of Nanjing (1842), which was signed after the first Opium War. It opened Chinese ports and markets to cheap Western machine-made products and collapsed the Chinese economy. As a consequence unemployment skyrocketed, poverty increased, and the Ching Dynasty (1644-1912) was unable to control the riots, social insurrection and chaos that spread over the country.
 
The Taiping rebellion, Hong Xiuquan Christian movement (1850-1864)
Hong Xiuquan was on a mission to reform China and believed himself to be son of God and younger brother of Jesus as a result of reading the Bible, Christian teachings by missionaries, and a series of visions. A friend of his, Feng Yün-shan, used his ideas to form the God Worshipper Society (Pai Shang-ti Hui). In 1847 Hong joined Feng and his society. Three years later, Hong started a rebellion and proclaimed the "Heavenly Kingdom of Great Peace" dynasty with him having the title of heavenly King (Tien-wang).
     Their rallying cry "to share property in common" appealed largely to non-elites. It attracted large numbers of famine stricken peasants, workers, miners, coolies, and village school teachers. Soon he had a million disciplined and fanatically zealous soldiers. They proved to be superior to government troops in battle. In the next few years they ravaged 17 provinces and finally in 1853 took Nanjing, the largest city in central China. They renamed the city Heavenly Capital (T'ien-ching). Taiping Christianity was strictly based on Hong's interpretation of the Bible:
  • Prohibited were: prostitution, foot binding, slavery, opium smoking, adultery, gambling, and the consumption of tobacco and wine.
  • The Chinese language was simplified.
  • The equality of men and women was proclaimed.
  • All property was to be held in common.
     Moreover, in common with other Christian denominations they regarded the Bible as the word of God, they baptized in the name of God, they prayed in the name of Jesus, and they believed that God was the creator of everything and the recipient of love, worship, and praise. So, by all accounts they were Christians with a superior understanding of the equality between men and women. However, they could not expect that the Western powers in China would tolerate an assault on their real object of worship, Mammon. The decree against smoking opium, and that all property should be held in common, was greatly detested by them.
     Further attempts to gain territory such as the city of Shanghai was stopped with Western help. After a death toll of about 20 million, the experiment of a Chinese Christian kingdom came to an end. In 1864, Hong's "Heavenly Capital" (T'ien-ching) fell to government forces, Hong committed suicide, and 100,000 of his followers preferred death rather than capture.
Note: The best book on the subject is probably Spence's God's Chinese Son: The Heavenly Kingdom of Hong Xiuquan, 1996.