V.1 From Origins to Organized Religion
To understand a religion is to learn its origins and development over
time. But more importantly, to evaluate is to know what is practiced rather than
what is preached.
This writer
Rather than its
being the case that understanding religion requires belief, understanding
religion, in a genuine way, is incompatible with believing it. Moreover,
this secular understanding can be a sensitive empathetic understanding
attuned (as Durkheim thought it must be) to the realities of religious
experience and sentiment. Kai Nielson
(b.1926)
The mind will always create morality, religion,
and mythology, and empower them with emotional force. The mental
processes of religious belief represent programmed predispositions
incorporated into the neural apparatus of the brain by thousands of
years of genetic evolution. As such they are powerful, ineradicable
and at the center of human social existence.
Edward O. Wilson (b.1929)
Religious experiences which are as real as life to some may be
incomprehensible to others.
William O. Douglas (1898-1980)
A person's psychological makeup affects his or her
religious experience, and that experience is best evaluated in terms of
its moral quality.
William James (1842-1910)
The true meaning of
religion is thus, not simply morality, but morality touched by
emotion.
Matthew Arnold (1822-88)
Religious texts, though held sacred by
believers, do not readily yield ethics or morality because they
endorse both right and wrong conduct. Hence, inferences from these
texts are no better than the ethical skills one brings to the task
of interpretation.
This writer
Introduction
A. About Religion in General
B.
How Did Religious Beliefs Originate?
C. How Did Organized Religions Evolve?
Introduction
Since
faith helps many to cope with life and often encourages humane ideals, it is my objective, here and elsewhere, not to criticize
supernatural beliefs of any
religion or spiritual tradition for the sake of making adverse comments. However, when
belief systems serve to subjugate, intimidate, deceive, exploit, and
dehumanize, then it would be
intellectually dishonest and morally indefensible not to point this out.
A. About
Religion in General
Religion is a world power, but it is not a universally good thing.
It offers life-coping explanations and hope for a better next
life. However, organized religion has a long history of cruel,
self-serving actions such as coercing and killing "unbelievers,"
legitimizing the exploiting powerful, oppressing
women, and indoctrinating children, imprisoning free thought, and
terrorizing the mind. In contrast, genuine religion (see
Forberg's definition and Kant's maxim in
Intellectual Giants Critique Religion) has always been practiced by
enlightened individuals of all backgrounds. It is the natural desire of a humane
mind that the
true, the good, and the beautiful shall be victorious and triumph over
the false, the wicked, and the ugly. It follows that we must examine
organized religion for the benefit of everybody as well as for religion itself.
How
should religion be
scrutinized?
It should be based on the best of human
rationality and knowledge. That
is, it should be science based
and proceed
in the tradition of the philosophy of religion. This tradition examines
religious truth claims from the perspective of philosophy. It does not take for granted the truth of any
religious beliefs. Instead, it attempts to give naturalistic or scientific explanations for
what may be natural human experiences and constructs of the mind.
It
should not be faith based
because most, if not all,
religions have creation and developmental accounts that they claim were revealed by
some higher authority such as God, gods, or goddesses. These accounts contain foundational assumptions, beliefs,
and doctrines that are accepted as
true but not verifiable. For instance, the Judeo-Christian-Islamic
religions assume the existence of their version of God. Buddhism and Hinduism accept as
true the Law of Karma.
It
should start at the beginning with religious-like behavior. For an
accurate single
chronology of cannot be established because they evolved
differently in various regions of the world. However, we have a good idea
how religion developed from contemporary studies of so-called "primitive"
cultures and historical evidence such as language and writings. Moreover, the earliest evidence archeology
provides seems to furnish evidence of what communal groups must have been
like as long as 60,000 years ago.
What is
religion?
-
Although
religion is a universal phenomena, it takes on a multitude of outward
appearances. Adherents may worship a single god, many gods, goddesses or
the idea of god(s) may be completely absent. Moreover, god may be thought
of as a person or not as a person. Believers may
practice praying, meditation, or rituals in a solitary or community setting.
-
Religion, as a minimum
ingredient, must claim things, beings, forces, or events that cannot be
subject to verification by the senses or the extended senses, instruments.
This is so because if they would be testable, then they would fall in the domain of the
sciences and could be shown to be true or false.
-
Another
feature that is probably common to all religions is a sharp distinction
between the sacred and the profane (see below). The sacred is
anything that is
regarded as
part of the supernatural or spiritual rather than the ordinary world. It
arouses awe, reverence, and deep respect. Also, anything could be
considered sacred: a variety of gods, texts, revelations, symbols such as
a cross, a person, geographical features such as rocks, mountains,
valleys, rivers, or even objects in the sky such as the sun or the moon.
-
Moreover,
the sacred is usually approached through rituals. Rituals are
formal, stylized proceedings such as prayer, incantation, or ceremonial
purifications.
-
The sacred
is often contrasted with the profane
(the mundane, secular, this worldly). The profane is anything that is regarded as
part of the ordinary rather than the supernatural or spiritual world.
What is
the minimum requirement for an enduring religion?
It is the
declaration that spiritual (immaterial, disembodied) beings, forces or
worlds exist. Moreover, the devout often claim to have inner experiences with what they believe
is a spiritual reality. These supernatural, outside the natural world,
claims often include miracles, divine revelations, and divinely inspired
texts. These claims are substantially disconnected from the empirical
world, that is, they are non-scientific. Hence, these claims cannot be
proven false. This appears to be one major factor why some religions endure.
What basic human needs
does religion generally satisfy?
Besides
physical safety and material needs, humans also need psychological
security. That is, they need answers to questions raised by their
curious minds:
-
Who are we?
-
How should
we live?
-
Where does
it all come from?
-
What is the
meaning of life?
-
Where does
morality come from?
-
Who has
moral authority?
-
How can we
achieve justice (all get what they deserve)?
-
Why is
there so much evil?
-
Why do the
innocent have to suffer?
-
Does God or
gods exist?
-
If higher
powers exist, how may I earn their help or favors?
-
What may we
expect after life as we know it is over?
-
How may I
obtain a happy afterlife (in heaven)?
-
How may I
procure
a
better life through reincarnation (here on earth)?
-
How may I
reach a
state of perfect blessedness (nirvana)?
-
Is there a
true ultimate belief, and how may I find it?
Also, an
apparently ingrained feeling of dependence and reliance upon some higher
power is experienced by many. And though probably learned, it is
probably the strongest motivating force to be religious, that is, being
bound to the doctrines of one's religion. Moreover, their belief is
fortified by the presence of this higher power or God experienced
subjectively when the believer prays or meditates.
The world
religions have explanations that originated in ancient, pre-scientific
times. Although not obvious, these answers also entailed the means for
social control, that is, they had to be acceptable by rulers and the
ruled. Acceptance by the ruled was often accomplished with brute force
until the means became a tradition.
-
They blame
the victims of historical circumstances, or exploitation by others, for
their own misfortune. For example, the dogma of original sin in the
Judeo-Christian-Islamic tradition and the law of Karma in the
Hindu-Buddhist tradition.
-
At the same
time, these concepts also legitimize the undeserved winners of historical
circumstances and exploitation. In the Judeo-Christian-Islamic system, it
is simply argued that everybody should stay in their by God ordained
place and with theirs as it happens to be on top. And in the
Hindu-Buddhist religions, those on top claim that they simply enjoy what
they have earned in a prior life according to the law of Karma--you reap
(in this life) what you sowed (in a prior life). You "reap what you sow" is
also mentioned in the Bible.
Still
another, though evil, benefit of religion is that it provides the means to override
an individual's scruples or conscience
when it is deemed necessary to act atrociously for the good of the faith,
country, or individual. The monotheistic religions
(Judeo-Christian-Islamic) are particularly good at this. For
example, the Israelites had no scruples when in the name of God, they
exterminated entire nations (see Judaism in The
Most Influential World Religions).
Also, the Christian nations had no qualms when they decimated the people
of their colonies, enslaved the survivors, and destroyed their cultures
while imposing their religion. Moreover, Islam was initially also spread
by the sword to impose its faith and culture while destroying the faith
and culture of others, for instance, Zoroastrianism. And Hinduism's
caste system enslaved most of the indigenous population of India for
millennia.
Why examine religions?
To
reiterate, because religious moral guidance and
views of what is "best" still
dominate the minds of the multitude. For them, supernatural claims, hopes, and explanations
are a source of considerable help and comfort. Many of these beliefs rest on
subjective evaluations of both natural phenomena and personal
experiences.
Being subjective makes them difficult to be appraised or verified scientifically. To
the many, religious belief, true or false and verifiable or not, appear to
be an indispensable aid to a tranquil life and the key to avoid chaos of consciousness. However,
the faithful have often been deceived and exploited with the help of
self-serving religious guidance and views. Hence, one must examine religious claims and
expose those that have pernicious consequences.
Is There Such a Thing as Intelligent Belief and
Unbelief?
Believers should accept that intelligent belief requires that
they not be credulous. For instance,
over half of humanity believes that a supernatural creator
originated this world with humans in his or her image. It follows
that rather than accepting metaphor and tradition, believers have a
sacred duty to learn about and accept "general revelation," namely, this creator's most original
work or text, the natural world.
However, this learning will reflect his or
her
image only if they do it humanely, that is, utilizing
the best qualities humans are capable of. These are objectivity and intellectual
honesty in the search for truth, and compassion when interpreting
findings toward rules of social conduct and relations.
Unbelievers, on the other hand,
should tolerate and respect this variety of life-coping beliefs as
long as they do not interfere with the well-being of the believer,
other individuals, or the group. A distinction must be made between
the individual believer and an all-to-often ill-motivated,
self-serving hierarchy of a religion.
The
individual's naturally evolved "moral" sentiment and potential for
acquiring culture's rules of conduct are the real foundation of the
community, Moreover, since unbelievers have to interact with
believers, they should learn about religions' origins, development,
and what faith, the often unquestioned belief that does not require
scientific proof or evidence, means to the believer.
B. How Did Religious Beliefs Originate?
The short answer is
to cope with life, to satisfy inquiring minds, and to exercise social
control by a few over the many:
-
They needed a simple explanation of life and the
world to avoid chaos of consciousness.
-
They needed
relief from existential anxieties for as Schopenhauer (1788-1860) observed:
Nature shows that with the
growth of intelligence comes increased capacity for pain, and it is only
with the highest degree of intelligence that suffering reaches its supreme
point.
-
They needed
a moral ideal and therefore created gods and supernatural forces in their
own moral image. Hence, morality existed prior to religion and is also
observable among non-human primates to a degree.
-
They needed assurance that justice will be
served if not in this life, then in the next.
-
They needed hope for immortality to endure
life that was pointlessly "solitaire, nasty, brutish, and short."
-
They, the few who ruled among them, needed
extra help in form of a belief system to control the many.
-
They needed excuses to maintain a tranquil
conscience when greed and competition for survival required cruel acts
such as exploiting, enslaving, robbing, raping, and killing of innocent
others. For instance, as recorded in their scriptures, the "God-approved"
cruelties of the Hebrews against their neighbors are classical examples.
However, like-justified cruelties have been committed by all the world
religions with the possible exception of Buddhism.
-
Finally,
they needed specialists, priests, who then claimed to control access to
God, forgive sins and crimes on His behalf, and maintained that prayers
and sacrifices are meritorious acts that incline God to grant favors. If
the wishes remain unfulfilled, the faithful are told that their prayers and sacrifices were
insufficient.
Modern humans (homo
sapiens) appeared approximately 200,000 years ago. And until about 12,000
years ago they lived in small groups (perhaps 25-125) as hunters and gatherers. They had large brains
that had evolved like everything else because it gave them a competitive
advantage over other animals. But they also had to compete within their own group
with
social skills made possible by a large brain. The large brain may have
evolved because it allowed better social survival skills--the socially
fittest produced more offspring. At least this is
to date the most plausible explanation. Apparently,
language that allowed higher forms of thinking evolved simultaneously or
sometime later.
Now, with the extra thinking capacity of
a large
brain:
-
Most
certainly, humans could better communicate, plan for the future, and most
importantly, they could pass on culture to succeeding generations.
-
Also, humans had become
aware of themselves, that is, the
individual's self-recognition and conscious experience, as stored in
memory, of a distinct, personal identity that is
separate from all other people and things. In humans, thus, the universe had
become conscious of itself together with an answer-demanding, immense
curiosity.
-
And besides the world
of conscious sense experiences, there was for them another world, for
they did not clearly distinguish between the waking and the dreaming
state. In the dreaming state they could meet family members and friends which had
died some time ago. Moreover, they could be in touch with
spiritual beings and forces unseen or known in the waking world. To them
it was clear, there was more to this world than what their waking senses
could experience.
-
And when they thought
about the environment and the natural forces they experienced, they did
not understand and started to ask questions. But there were no ready
answers. However, answers they desperately needed to avoid chaos of
consciousness.
-
And when
survival depended on competition for scarce resources, such as
life-supporting land, required them to kill other humans, religion
provided justifications so that it could be done while maintaining a
tranquil conscience. For example, Gods chosen people being ordered to
exterminate unbelievers.
-
And unable
to conceive of impersonal natural laws, they filled this
knowledge gap with a multitude of mythologies, spirits and gods. There
were creation myths and epics, forces and gods in charge of almost
everything from rain, thunder and lightning to the fertility of their
women and later of the crops in the field. They believed that everything
is alive; that spirits are in all things, or that all
things have souls. Moreover, they
accepted that spirits or souls were the cause of all life including their
own. These entities, particularly in humans, would continue to exist after
the body perishes and could be experienced in meditations, dreams and
trances.
-
And these animistic
and
polytheistic forerunners of today's religions sometimes included ancestor
and nature worship. Totemism was probably the least connected belief
system to today's religions. Here an animal or other natural object was thought
of as ancestrally related to a given group. This totem was often kept as a
companion and helper with supernatural powers, and as such it is honored
and occasionally revered.
-
And archaeology disclosed the huge magnitude of the cultures and
civilizations of Mesopotamia, Egypt and Syrian-Palestine as well as a
large quantity of inscriptions. as one researcher observed: "the
magnitude proves to be a conglomeration of temple cultures devised to
pacify the anger of the Unknown. The Unknown, represented by idolatry and
polytheism, confronts and threatens human self with arbitrary destinies
and fates leading to cruel, merciless misfortunes and death. This complex
of destiny and fate has obsessed not only the Near East but also the whole
world past and present. It has indispensably given rise to temple culture
that is characteristic of the whole globe."
-
Concerning ancient gods: The
"Venus of Willendorf" is a limestone
figurine about
24,000 to 26,000 years old. The exaggerated
sex organs and apparent pregnancy could indicate that it was the symbol of
a fertility goddess. Many figures with like characteristics have been
unearthed between Russia and France.
b) A Sumerian clay tablet in the language of cuneiform script from ca.
2,400 BCE list Sumerian deities in order of seniority,
Enlil,
Ninlil,
Enki,
Nergal,
Hendursanga,
Inanna-Zabalam,
Ninebgal,
Inanna,
Utu,
Nanna.
c) Early in the 21st century a temple with the names of about 20,000 gods
was unearthed in what is now Iraq. The large number of gods came about
when a conquered people were forced to accept the gods of the victors but
were allowed to retain their gods.
To summarize. There appears to be no specific instinct for
religious belief in general or for a particular belief such as in only one
single god, monotheism.
However, as Joseph Campbell (1904-1987) suggests, there is a universal
need of the human mind to explain social, cosmological, and spiritual
realities. The primary instinct involved appears to be the need for tranquility of
consciousness and conscience being achieved thru physical and emotional security as well
as explanations for the bewildering events of life such as birth,
sickness, suffering, death, and a variety of humanly and naturally caused
calamities. But as far as religion is concerned, we are all born areligious,
that is,
unconcerned with or indifferent to religious matters.
Religion is primarily acquired from the tradition of a culture according
to and largely determined by a person's geographical location.
C. How Did Organized Religions Evolve?
"Believing is easier than thinking; hence, more believers than thinkers."
Until
about 12,000 years ago, before humans learned to domesticate plants and
animals, they subsisted in small groups. Their curiosity was satisfied
with mythologies and animistic as well as polytheistic beliefs as told by
their usually part-time shaman, witchdoctor or medicine man. The agricultural revolution, then,
facilitated larger communities, the division of labor, and eventually
civilizations with full-time rulers. Moreover, the part-time spiritualists
were now replaced with full-time priests.
-
And the diversity of
religious beliefs by various groups within larger communities and tribal
associations
often caused discord and infighting. Therefore, the rulers ordered their priests to
come up with a belief system that would unite while firmly supporting the
rulers on top, the priests second, and the rest at the bottom. The new
creed would then be imposed on all subjects by friendly persuasion, but
more often with the sword as in the case of the most successful world
religions.
-
And the priests came up
with well-organized, complex belief systems that would have answers to
all the cosmological and existential questions as well as guides and
justification for practices. Furthermore, it would show that
everybody had a divinely ordained, or prior life earned, station in life. It just so happened
that the divine or royal rulers', their families' and friends' as well as
the
priests' station was on top while the rest was at the bottom. To this day,
it is used as a justification for people who would start at the bottom and
usually stay there.
-
And, of course,
the priests did not just "come up" with something. Instead, they
claimed it was
revealed to them by a god or gods who often dwelled in another world.
Prior to the invention of writing about 5,000 years ago, this knowledge was
orally transmitted from generation to generation. Subsequently, it was recorded in sacred scriptures
by writers who it was claimed were inspired or guided by higher powers. A
most influential culture with an orally transmitted tradition were the
Indo-Europeans.
-
And today's
world religions were written down between 1,300 and 2,200 years ago. This
enshrined and sanctified the teachings almost permanently but led to a major loss of
flexibility and lack of adaptation to new realities and insights. This
necessitated the practice of eisegetical interpretation of scriptures. It
expresses the interpreter's own ideas, bias, or the like, rather than the
meaning of the text. The eisegete says "the scriptures say . . . . This
means stating his idea. . . . Thus by reading his own ideas into the
text, he gets them back, and passes them on, endowed with authority.
The Seminal
Significance of the Proto-Indo-European Religion
The Indo-Europeans were a
group of people who lived from about 4,500 BCE in an area around the Black
Sea, that is, between south-east Europe and Asia. Their existence is
inferred from the super-family of Proto-Indo-European languages. Major
subgroups include the Germanic L. (English, German, etc.), Italic L.
(Latin, thus, Italian, Spanish, French, etc.), Greek L., and the
Indo-Iranian L. (Sanskrit, Hindi, Urdu, Bengali, Punjabi, Persian, etc.)
consisting of over 300 languages spoken by about 1,000 million people.
As the map below indicates, these Indo-Europeans migrated from their
original area from ca. 4,000 to 1,000 BCE according to the widely accepted
Kurgan hypothesis. The purple
area corresponds to the assumed
original home. The red area corresponds
to the area which may have been settled by Indo-European-speaking peoples
up to ca. 2500 BCE; the orange area to 1000 BCE.
Map
of Indo-European migrations from ca. 4000 to 1000 BCE
(Diagram source:
Wikipedia)
A study of
the myths, deities and religious customs of the dispersed Indo-European
people indicates origins from a common Proto-Indo-European religion and
mythology. Of course, there may have been a parallel development, but the
best evidence is the existence of cognate (derived from the same source)
words and names in those Indo-European tongues.
It appears that this ancestral religion was the source of pre-Christian
religions in Europe, of the Dharmic* (Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.)
religions in India, and of Zoroastrianism in Iran. Religion was sustained
by a class of priests or shamans subordinate to a tribal king who may also
have been the high priest. There were four classes, the royal, the
clerical, the warriors, and the peasants. Historical Indo-European
religions also had priestesses, either as temple prostitutes, dedicated
virgins, or oracles.
*The
theology and philosophy of Dharmic Religions center on the concept of
Dharma, a
Sanskrit term for "fixed decree, law,
duty", especially in a spiritual sense of "natural law, reality".
Ancient
anthropomorphic
Ukrainian stone stela (Kernosovka stela), possibly depicting a late
Proto-Indo-European god, most likely
Dyeus.
(Picture source: Wikipedia)
|