|
III.2
Knowledge as
Justified True Belief
There are very few human beings who
receive the truth, complete and staggering, by instant illumination. Most
of them acquire it fragment by fragment, on a small scale, by successive
developments, cellularly, like a laborious mosaic.
Anais Nin (1903-77)
On the
mountains of truth you can never climb in vain: either you will reach a point
higher up today, or you will be training your powers so that you will be able
to climb higher tomorrow.
Our
treasure lies in the beehive of our knowledge. We are perpetually on the way
thither, being by nature winged insects and honey gatherers of the mind.
All
credibility, all good conscience, all evidence of truth come only from the
senses.
The most
common lie is that which one lies to himself; lying to others is relatively an
exception.
Friedrich
Nietzsche (1844-1900)
Honesty of thought and speech and
written word is a jewel, and they who curb prejudice and seek
honorably to know and speak the truth are the only builders of a
better life.
John Galsworthy (1867-1933)
A.
About Knowledge in General
B.
Evaluating Propositions
C.
Truths and Falsity are Matters of Degree
A. About Knowledge
in General
The love of truth involves the desire
to have our conception of life in harmony with the actualities of
life, and therefore a supreme desire to be rid of all ignorances,
prejudices, and prepossessions which prevent our seeing clearly
these actualities. . . . Truth is harmony of expression with
reality.
Lyman
Abbott (1835-1922)
-
The state of knowing does
not come from simply believing something, for it must entail a
justification that a belief is at least probably true. Hence, we
seek Knowledge as Well-Justified, Probably True Belief.
-
Knowledge, if
defined as what is claimed to be true, requires belief as a
necessary condition because one can only assert to know something
when one beliefs it. However, one can belief a falsehood, hence,
there must be some other criteria.
-
A belief must also
be justified by other necessary conditions to reduce or
eliminate it being false. However, though the justification may be
true with reference to itself, it may not be one that has a
sufficient correlation to the belief. Thus, there must be another
necessary condition.
-
A belief must be
well (skillfully, expertly) justified. That is, a belief counts
as knowledge only if it was acquired by a for the context
appropriate method. And by far the best and proven method or
approach is the scientific one, see
What is
Science.
However, the most important kind of
knowledge, informative and predictive propositions, from the
sciences are only probably true because that is the nature of
empirical knowledge.
-
Hence, in the case
of empirical knowledge, certainty is not possible, and it would be
foolish to demand it. This kind of knowledge comes in Degrees
of Truth . . . (see below).
However, self-explanatory (analytic) knowledge can be absolutely
true or
false, but it is void of empirical content.
-
From the preceding
it follows that all our decisions and actions concerning the real
world are based on probable knowledge. Hence, the effort we expand
to gather knowledge should be in proportion to the importance of the
decision or action we contemplate.
-
Subjective propositions that claim
what is true is whatever one happens to believe are not acceptable.
And the same goes for
relativistic propositions that
argue what is true is whatever is accepted by one's culture or
community.
B.
Evaluating Propositions
Propositions, statements that are either true or false, may be appraised
by:
-
The
correspondence theory of truth, that is, by how they correspond to the facts of reality. For example, snow is
white if and only if it is white.
-
The
coherence theory of truth, that is, by
how they are consistent with the laws of physics and reason, that
is, in harmony with the whole realm of rational ideas.
For example, the proposition that water flows naturally uphill
contradicts the law of gravity. This theory is a useful supplement
to the correspondence theory because it enables us to venture with
some degree of certainty into realms not subject to direct
verification.
-
The pragmatic theory of truth,
that is, by how well things work. A proposition
may be accepted if it leads to satisfactory results or
has acceptable practical consequences. For example, some untrue belief
systems, because they are neither real nor coherent, help many cope
with life; hence, we should accept them. The meaning of the belief
system is then in its practical consequences.
C.
Truth and Falsity are Matters of Degree
It is the mark of an educated mind never to expect
more precision in the treatment of any subject than the nature of
that subject permits.
Aristotle (384-322
BCE)
The relationship
between knowledge and certainty
is as follows. As the "knowledge hierarchy" below shows, only tautologies
and contradictions can have an absolutely certain true or false value.
Whereas, all propositions about the real world, those with an empirical content,
are only probably
true or false because they
are contingent and never
wholly true or wholly false. These predicates are a matter of
probability or degree. One has to decide on a case by case basis whether or
not the predicate value is acceptable or unacceptable in support of
a proposition.
6. Certainly true (a tautology)
5. Obviously true (the highest value for an empirical proposition)
4. Evidently true (next to the highest value)
3. Clearly true (in
between)
2. Probably true (next to the lowest value)
1. Possibly true (the lowest value for an empirical proposition)
0. Counterbalanced
(50/50)
-1. Possibly false (the lowest value for an empirical proposition)
-2. Probably false (next to the lowest value)
-3. Clearly false (in between)
-4. Evidently false (next to the highest value)
-5. Obviously false (the highest value for an empirical proposition)
-6. Certainly false (a contradiction)
|